1 / 9

C M Roach Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK

Discussion on Profile Database Release PR0 X. C M Roach Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK Status of PR0 X NF Paper Other Issues This work was jointly funded by the EPSRC and EURATOM. Status of NF Paper PR0 X.

morela
Télécharger la présentation

C M Roach Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Discussion on Profile Database Release PR0X • C M Roach • Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK • Status of PR0X NF Paper • Other Issues • This work was jointly funded by the EPSRC and EURATOM

  2. Status of NF Paper PR0X • Fairly complete draft of NF paper is now available online at:http://tokamak-profiledb.ukaea.org.uk/RESTRICTED/PR0x/pr0x_nf.pdf (username+password available on request to co-authors.) • CMR has requested comments • latex files at:http://tokamak-profiledb.ukaea.org.uk/RESTRICTED/PR0x/ • just add \Blue{your comment} to Latex files. • Specific feedback also requested from this session!

  3. Issues for THIS MEETING to resolve (1) Final Author list: should all modellers be included? • volunteers needed to check author list + give corrections to CMR (2) Sec 2: Table 1 is not presently helpful for the reader, so will improve by instead categorising providing number of discharges in each category ITB, DT, hybrid, high performance H-mode etc. • request specific comments to improve Table1 (3) Sec 2: imbalanced detail in machine contributions: eg JET provided much more detail than AUG/TS. • request specific comments to improve balance

  4. Issues for THIS MEETING to resolve • (4) Sec 4: Can physics review be strengthened, without rewriting old papers or new physics analyses? • request specific comments on Sec 4 (5) A Few Missing NF Contributions: TFTR: descriptions of 2 PR0x discharges D3D: descriptions of 20 PR0x discharges • Action: When can these be ready? or go ahead without? ... “shame to spoil the ship for a ha’penny worth of tar!” (6) Some discharges remain incompatible with PR0x variables: D3D ~19 discharges; TFTR 1 PR0x, 79 PR98 discharges • Action: When can these be ready? or go ahead without?

  5. PR0X Discharges + NF contributions by machine Machine Discharges Representative NF section AUG: 10007 11197 12059 12536 13039 13151 F Ryter  D3D: 99251 98775 9877799411 104276 111203 111221 111239 118334 118341 118348 11844689943 926649598998549 C Greenfield? 99696 103818 106919 106956 FTU: 12747 15020 B Esposito • JET: 40542 40847 42762 42794 42976 42982 42997 43002 43134 • 43452 46123 46664 49687 50844 51599 51976 52009 52014 • 52015 52022 52024 52025 52096 52979 53028 53030 53212 I Voitsekovich • 53299 53501 53521 53532 53537 53550 55935 57987 58159 • 58323 60927 60931 60933 • JT60U: 29387 31872 34487 35634 35658 39056 39713 43903 Y Sakamoto • MAST: 8302 8500 8505 8563 8564 8570 8575 A R Field  • RTP: 97052248 97052261 97052263 97052270 97053056 D Hogeweij  • T10: 33957 33965 33970 A Chudnovskij  • TFTR: 80539 66887*R Budny? • TS: 18302 18305 18319 18368 18370 18372 18488 18490 18496 • 18500 18504 18507 18520 18765 18768 18769 18771 18774 F Imbeaux • 18775 18778 18780 18790 18792 18799 18801 18805 18807 • TXTR: 68803 68812 D Hogeweij  • Red = discharges not yet compatible with PR0X variables as agreed 2005 • * NB 81 TFTR PR98 discharges also not yet compatible: be nice to make them consistent too! •  = promised in Lausanne!!

  6. PR0X Appendix A on ITER Scenarios (7) Appendix A ITER Scenarios: no descriptions from R Budny’s scenarios. A Polevoi’s ITER scenarios not submitted to PR0x. • Action: ITER modellers agree PR0x scenarios and Appendix A. Machine Discharges Representative NF section • ITER: 20120300 20140300 20310300 20350300 20370300 20380300F Imbeaux  • 20390300 20410300 • 20010100 20020100 20030100 2004010010010100 10020100 R Budny ? • ??????? ??????? ??????? ???????A Polevoi • Red = scenarios not yet described in Appendix A of NF Draft. •  = promised in Lausanne!!

  7. Issues for THIS MEETING to resolve (8) Acknowledgements: • Action: comments/suggestions on acknowledgements? (9) Intend to illustrate web-based plots (from NTCC data server) by adding figures to Section 3 : eg Pfus(t) from record JET, TFTR shots, and ITB T,n profiles from other machines • Action: suggestions for specific plots? • (10) When submit to NF? • suggestions for submission timescale (given above constraints)?

  8. Other Issues for PR0x UKAEA will: (1) upgrade operating system on tokamak-profiledb for improved maintainability/security: presently Fedora 2. (2) Fix NTCC data server, with help from J Carlsson. (3) Make PR0x public by end of 2007?

  9. Conclusions Status of PR0X Data: • 102/122 PR0X discharges are ready for publication now • a fewkey discharges (d3d, tftr) still to comply with agreed variables • iter modelling scenarios missing • wait, or go ahead without? NF Paper Status: • almost completed draft available at http://tokamak-profiledb.ukaea.org.uk/RESTRICTED/ • comments requested for speedy submission to journal Have we finalised commitments for missing elements in this session?

More Related