1 / 16

High-efficiency wet electrocyclone for removing nanoparticle and microparticle

High-efficiency wet electrocyclone for removing nanoparticle and microparticle. National Chiao Tung University Guan-Yu Lin, Le-Thi Cuc, Chuen -Jinn Tsai * , Wei Lu, Hung-Min Chein a , Fang-Tang Chang a

mort
Télécharger la présentation

High-efficiency wet electrocyclone for removing nanoparticle and microparticle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High-efficiency wet electrocyclone for removing nanoparticle and microparticle National Chiao Tung University Guan-Yu Lin, Le-Thi Cuc, Chuen-Jinn Tsai*, Wei Lu, Hung-Min Cheina, Fang-Tang Changa aJG Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, No.8, Gaoping Sec., Zhongfeng Rd., Longtan Township, Taoyuan County 325, Taiwan 2012/11/20

  2. Introduction • ESPs: Advantages: High efficiency for particles smaller than 10 μm. Disadvantages: High capital and operation and maintenance costs. (Shrimptonand Crane 2001; USEPA 2003a). Decrease in collection efficiency due to the accumulation of particles on collection electrode surfaces, back corona, and particle re-entrainment. • Cyclones: Advantages: Simple and cost efficient to construct. but have Disadvantages: Low collection efficiency for fine particles (USEPA 2003b). • Electrocyclones: Combination of ESPs and cyclones.

  3. Objectives To design and develop a high efficiency wet electrocyclone. • Collection efficiency experiment for particles with different resistivity. • Optimum operation conditions: I-V curve, pressure drop, the quantity of water mist, flow rate of scrubbing water. • Loading test. • Field test.

  4. Experimental Method • Test particles: Oleic acid, Al2O3, soot. • Oleic acid: Generated by Atomizer Model 3076 PSI, resistivity is 8.0~16×108Ω-cm. • Al2O3: Generated by Jet-O-Mizer (Fluid Energy Model 000), resistivity is 10×1012~14 Ω-cm。 • Soot: Generated by diffusion flame burner (Kim et al. 2009), resistivity is 3.5×10−3Ω-cm.

  5. Inlet air flow rate: 1000(residence time=1.28 sec)~4500 (residentce time=0.28 sec)L/min。 • Applied voltage: 21kV。 • Nozzle: mist diameter: 50 mm，water flow rate: 0.1 L/min 。 • 4 scrubbing water flow: 22 L/min。 • Tips to collection electrode spacing: 4 cm。

  6. Results and discussion • Presure drop andI-V curve Kozlovet al. (2006); Adamiakand Atten (2004)

  7. Air flow rate: 1000 L/min • Particle collectoin efficiency: Oleic acid, Al2O3, soot

  8. Air flow rate: 2500 L/min • Particle collectoin efficiency: Oleic acid, Al2O3, soot

  9. Air flow rate: 4500 L/min • Particle collectoin efficiency: Oleic acid, Al2O3, soot

  10. Particle collection for three test particles. Particle collection for oleic acid with different number of discharge discs.

  11. Dry electrocyclone loading test. • Loading time: 2 hr • Al2O3 loading quantity: 180 g/hr/m2(0.37g/m3)

  12. Wet electrocyclone loading test • Loading time: 2 hr • Scrubbing water flow rate: 22 L/min, mist flow rate: 0.1 L/min

  13. Field test

  14. Conclusions • Particle collectoin efficiency: Oleic acid (20~800 nm):78~92% (4500 L/min), 97~99% (1000 L/min). Soot (20~800 nm): 92~99%(4500 L/min), 99~99.9%(1000 L/min). Al2O3 (0.5~20 mm): 75~99%(4500 L/min), 87~99.9%(1000 L/min). • The applied voltage: 12.5-21 kV, corona current: 3.7-7.8 mA. • Collection efficiencies increase with increasing discharge discs. • Dry electrocyclone loading test: Loading time: 360 min. Thickness of dust cake: 0.5 cm. • Wet electrocyclones can be used to solve the problems occur in the traditional dry electrocyclones.

  15. Thanks for your attention!

More Related