SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Development of a risk prediction model for Barrett’s oesophagus

mosesd avatar
18 diapositives · 255 Views · Jan 02, 2020

This study explores the development and validation of a screening tool for Barrett’s oesophagus in primary healthcare settings, aiming to improve early detection and survival rates. It includes background on the condition, results from the PhD study, and plans for future research.

Development of a risk prediction model for Barrett’s oesophagus - slide 1
01 / 18Development of a risk prediction model for Barrett’s oesophagus
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Development of a risk prediction model for Barrett’s oesophagus
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Development of a risk prediction model for Barrett’s oesophagus Colin Ireland PhD Candidate School of Nursing and Midwifery Division of Health Sciences Supportive Care in Cancer: Advances in Nursing Symposium 22 June 2016

  2. Outline Background Overview of PhD study Results What’s next?

  3. Background Incidence of adenocarcinoma increased 5 fold in last 25 years 5-year survival rate from adenocarcinoma of the oesophageal is poor – many late diagnosis Australia (2011) 991 Males 404 Females Early diagnosis may result in earlier treatment and better survival rates (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2015, Kramer et al. 2012)

  4. Barrett’s oesophagus Barrett’s oesophagus – precursor to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus 30-40 times greater risk of developing adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus Targeted screening could lead to earlier detection and better survival outcomes

  5. Barrett’s oesophagus Normal squamous cell epithelium of the oesophagus changes to a columnar like epithelial tissue. Initially protective measure for reflux Estimated prevalence 1.2 – 1.6% general population Generally asymptomatic Increased risk of dysplasia leading to adenocarcinoma (de Jonge et al. 2014, Fitzgerald et al. 2014, Kramer et al. 2012, Thrift et al. 2014, Zimmerman 2014)

  6. Prediction tools for Barrett’s oesophagus 5 previous tools developed Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC) around 0.70 (70% chance of detection) Based on subsets of population (E.g. White males, 50-79 years) Gerson et al. 2001, Locke, Zinsmeister & Talley 2003, Thrift et al. 2012, Rubenstein et al. 2013, Liu et al. 2014

  7. Research Aim To develop and validate a screening tool for Barrett’s oesophagus, that is suitable for use in primary health care

  8. Study design

  9. Scoping review Follows systematic approach to searching Used to develop questionnaire for case control study Stages: 1: Identify research question 2: Identification of relevant studies 3: Study selection 4: Summarising the data 5: Reporting of the data

  10. Scoping review: Results Information used to develop questionnaire that was used in the case-control study Identified factors that were protective or increased risk Demographic Lifestyle Clinical Ireland CJ, Thompson SK, Laws TA, Esterman A. Risk factors for Barrett’s esophagus: a scoping review. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27:301-23.

  11. Case control study: development Method: Population based study Barrett’s oesophagus – identified by using Flinders Medical Centre database Population – identified using electoral roll Data collection: Mailed out invitation letter and questionnaire If not returned within 3 weeks information sent again Completed questionnaires entered into database

  12. Results

  13. Process

  14. Summary of predictors

  15. Performance Lowess smoother calibration plot Area under the receiver operator characteristic Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p=0.67

  16. Next steps

  17. Acknowledgements/ Collaborators Supervisors UniSA Professor Adrian Esterman Dr Andrea Fielder Royal Adelaide Hospital A/Professor Sarah Thompson KeeleUniversity Dr Tom Laws Collaborators Flinders Medical Centre Professor David Watson QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Professor David Whiteman Flinders University Professor Richard Reed

  18. Thank you Colin.Ireland@mymail.unisa.edu.au