1 / 43

CIVITAS VANGUARD Kick-off meeting

CIVITAS VANGUARD Kick-off meeting. WP 2 Leader: Needs Assessment by Annemie Van Uytven & Elke Franchois. Mobiel 21: who we are? (1). Non-profit organisation in Belgium

nadda
Télécharger la présentation

CIVITAS VANGUARD Kick-off meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CIVITAS VANGUARD Kick-off meeting WP 2 Leader: Needs Assessment by Annemie Van Uytven & Elke Franchois

  2. Mobiel 21: who we are? (1) • Non-profit organisation in Belgium • Centre for knowledge development, education and behavioural change in the field of sustainable and safe transport and mobility • Formerly known as Langzaam Verkeer

  3. Mobiel 21: European experience (1) • CIVITAS MOBILIS • Coordination gender issues • PARAMOUNT • Eltis website (covering news items, events and case studies) and development of teaching and learning materials

  4. Mobiel 21: European experience (2) • EPOMM • Founding member of European Platform on MM • MAX • Research project on travel awareness campaigns and Mobility Management

  5. Mobiel 21: European experience (3) • E-atomium • Increasing knowledge and competencies of local energy agencies, energy efficiency advice centres and energy professionals in the field of sustainable energy use in transport

  6. WP2: Needs assessment • PART 1 • Methodology and tasks

  7. WP 2: Needs assessment WP 2 Objectives Evaluate the success and results of past and ongoing initiatives Identify the needs and expectations of the CIVITAS-Plus cities and external stakeholders Obtain support and active participation of the CIVITAS-Plus cities Provide on-going input to CIVITAS VANGUARD about the evolving needs and expectations of the project’s target audience

  8. WP2: Task 2.1 (1) • Task 2.1: Preliminary analysis of succes and results of past and ongoing initiatives • Civitas Catalist User Need Analysis • E-atomium • Competence • Eurobarometer • Moving together • Curacao • …

  9. WP2: Task 2.1 (2) • Task 2.1: Preliminary analysis • Timing • M1 (Oct. 08) • Partners • POLIS (leader), REC, M21

  10. WP2: task 2.2 step 1 (1) • Task 2.2: Needs assessment • Step 1: Development online questionnaires • Aim: reveal information, training and marketing needs and potentional benefits of CIVITAS • Target group: INTERNAL CIVITAS • CIVITAS Plus cities (26) • Quest. 1: Local diss. Managers • Quest. 2: Project diss. Managers • Former CIVITAS cities (36) • Quest. 3: dissemination managers of CIVITAS I & II projects • CIVITAS Forum Members (100 cities): • Quest. 4: Forum members

  11. WP2: task 2.2 step 1 (2) • Task 2.2: Needs assessment • Step 1: Development online questionnaires • Aim: reveal informational needs on CIVITAS • Target group: EXTERNAL CIVITAS • To get responses from 30 cities in Europe more in depth and several target groups in the city • Quest. 5: Local Mobility Department • Quest. 6: Local politician in charge of mobility • Quest. 7: Citizens in the cities • Quest. 8: University students • Quest. 9: Academia (Researchers) • Quest. 10: Schools

  12. WP2: task 2.2 step 1 (3) • Task 2.2: Needs assessment • Step 1: Development online questionnaires • Timing: M1-M3 (Oct. – Dec. 08) • Partners: M21(leader), POLIS, REC, FGM, EUROCITIES, ICLEI, Senter Novem

  13. WP2: task 2.2 step 1 (4) • Tasks partners • Questionnaires INTERNAL target group • Development of 3 quest. (M21, Polis, REC; M1 & M2 – Oct.-Nov. 08) • Approval quest. by the EC (REC; M3- Dec. 08) • Pretesting all quest. (M21; M3 – Dec. 08) • Provide contact details internal target group (FGM, REC; M1 & M2 - Oct. & Nov. 08) • Putting quest. online and deliver login for respondents (FGM – M3 – Dec.08)

  14. WP2: task 2.2 step 1 (5) • Tasks partners • Questionnaires EXTERNAL target group • Development 6 short quest. (M21, POLIS, REC; M1 & 2 – Oct & Nov. 08) • Approval quest. by EC (REC; M3 – Dec. 08) • Pretesting quest. (M21; M3 – Dec. 08) • List of 30 cities (geographical spread) (M21, POLIS, EUROCITIES, ICLEI, REC; M1 & 2 – Oct. & Nov. 08) • Contact details of those 30 cities (POLIS, EUROCITIES, ICLEI; M1 & 2 – Oct. & Nov. 08) • Putting quest. online and deliver login for respondents (FGM; M3 – Dec.08)

  15. WP2: task 2.2 step 2 (1) • Task 2.2: Needs assessment • Step 2: Implementation and follow up of the questionnaires by telephone and personal interviews • Timing: M4-M5 (Jan.-Feb 09) • Partners: M21(leader), POLIS, REC, FGM, EUROCITIES, ICLEI, Senter Novem

  16. WP2: task 2.2 step 2 (2) • Tasks partners • Contacting cities (M21, POLIS, EUROCITIES, ICLEI, Senter Novem, REC – M4 – Jan. 09) • Follow-up round through telephone to those who have not responded yet (M21, POLIS, EUROCITIES, ICLEI, Senter Novem, REC – M4 – Jan. 09) • Follow-up round through telephone regarding details of the questionnaire (M21, POLIS, EUROCITIES, ICLEI, Senter Novem, REC – M4 – Jan. 09)

  17. WP2: task 2.2 step 2 • Tasks partners • Personal visits to external target group cities (M21 – Senter Novem – ICLEI; M4 – Jan. 09) • Participation at CP kick-off meetings (M21 – Senter Novem – ICLEI; M4 – Jan.09) • Needs assessment report (M21; M5 – Feb.09)

  18. 3. WP2: task 2.3 • Task 2.3: Continuous assessment and adaptation • Online questionnaires available to be filled in at any time (all year long) • Yearly updated needs assessment (M21 POLIS, EUROCITIES, ICLEI, Senter Novem, REC – M12, 24, 36, 48)

  19. WP2: Needs assessment • PART 2 • Draft questionnaires

  20. WP2: needs assessment questionnaires • Key questions • What are the needs of the CIVITAS cities involved regarding dissemination? • What can VANGUARD offer CIVITAS cities? • What can the CIVITAS cities offer VANGUARD? • External CIVITAS cities: interest in CIVITAS content and dissemination material/methods

  21. WP2: needs assessment questionnaires Questions in questionnaires largely based on CIVITAS CATALIST User Needs Analysis Questionnaire (UNAQ) Can the analysis of 38 new potential take-up cities from CIVITAS CATALIST be used as supplement? Can translated UNAQ be partly used for external cities? Incentives for external cities to take part in questionnaire?

  22. Draft questionnaire (1)

  23. WP 2: draft questionnaires Q1 • Q1 • Target group: internal • CIVITAS PLUS cities • Local dissemination managers • N=25 • Minimum response: N=20 (80% resp. rate)

  24. WP2: draft questionnaire Q1 • Building blocks Q1 • Identification of person responsible for diss. in the city • Identification of audience of diss. in the city • Identification of ways of reaching audiences in the city • Identification of diss. tools in the city • Identification of training needs in the city (content & method) • Identification of support needs from VANGUARD to the city

  25. WP2: draft questionnaire Q2 • Q2 • Target group: internal • CIVITAS PLUS cities • Project dissemination managers • N=5 • Minimum response: N=5

  26. WP2: draft questionnaire Q2 • Building blocks Q2 • Identification of person responsible for diss. in the project • Identification of audience of diss. in the project • Identification of ways of reaching audiences in the project • Identification of diss. tools of the project • Identification of training needs by the project (content & method) • Identification of support needs from VANGUARD to the project • Identification of possible input delivery from the project to VANGUARD

  27. WP2: draft questionnaire Q3 • Q3 • Target group: internal • CIVITAS cities • Project dissemination managers of CIVITAS I & II • N=36 • Minimum response: N=25 (resp.rate 70%)

  28. WP2: draft questionnaire Q3 • Building blocks Q3 • Identification of person responsible for diss. in the project • Identification of audience of diss. in the project • Identification of ways of reaching audiences in the project • Identification of diss. tools of the project • Identification of training needs by the project (content & method) • Identification of support needs from VANGUARD to the project • Identification of possible support to the new CIVITAS cities

  29. WP2: draft questionnaire Q4 • Q4 • Target group: internal • CIVITAS FORUM cities • Mobility department of CIVITAS cities • N=100 • Minimum response rate: N=60 (resp. rate 60%)

  30. WP2: draft questionnaire Q4 • Building blocks Q4 • Current mobility situation in the city • Topics of interest to work on or gain information on • Knowlegde of the CIVITAS Initiative • History of the city regarding CIVITAS • Interest in becoming more involved into CIVITAS Initiative

  31. WP2: draft questionnaire Q5 • Q5 • Target group: external • Mobility department in a not related CIVITAS city • Contacting 200 cities (balanced regional spread and city size) • N=30 cities (cooperation + balanced regional spread and city size)

  32. WP2: draft questionnaire Q5 • Building blocks Q5 • Current mobility situation in the city • Topics of interest to work on or gain information on • Knowledge of the CIVITAS Initiative • History of the city regarding CIVITAS • Interest in becoming more involved into CIVITAS Initiative

  33. WP2: draft questionnaire Q6 • Q6 • Target group: external • Local politician in a not related CIVITAS city • Contacting 200 cities (balanced regional spread and city size) • N=30 cities (cooperation + balanced regional spread and city size)

  34. WP2: draft questionnaire Q6 • Building blocks Q6 • Current mobility situation in the city • Topics of interest to work on or gain information on • Knowlegde of the CIVITAS Initiative • History of the city regarding CIVITAS • Interest in becoming more involved into CIVITAS Initiative

  35. WP2: draft questionnaire Q7 • Q7 • Target group: external • Citizen in a not related city • Target: response of 1 in 1000 inhabitants in 30 cooperating cities • Number of responses depending on city size • Possible goal: deliver results to CIVITAS Plus cities on how citizens around Europe perceive CIVITAS

  36. WP2: draft questionnaire Q7 • Building blocks Q7 • Assessment of the current mobility situation in the city • Interest in getting a more sustainable mobility in the city • Identification of supported sustainable mobility measures • Identification of barriers facing the development of a more sustainable mobility • Explanation and knowledge of the CIVITAS Initiative • Interest in CIVITAS Initiative activities

  37. WP2: draft questionnaire Q8 • Q8 • Target group: external • Students in a not related CIVITAS city • Target: response of 1 in 100 students in 30 cooperating cities • Number of responses depending on number of students in the city

  38. WP2: draft questionnaire Q8 • Building blocks Q8 • Assessment of the current mobility situation in the city • Interest in getting a more sustainable mobility in the city • Identification of supported sustainable mobility measures • Identification of barriers facing the development of a more sustainable mobility • Explanation and knowledge of the CIVITAS Initiative • Interest in CIVITAS Initiative activities

  39. WP2: draft questionnaire Q9 • Q9 • Target group: external • Academia on mobility and transport • Target responses: N=50

  40. WP2: draft questionnaire Q9 • Building blocks Q9 • Explanation and knowledge of the CIVITAS Initiative • Interest in CIVITAS Initiative activities

  41. WP2: draft questionnaire Q10 • Q10 • Target group: external • Schools in a not related CIVITAS city • Target: response of 10% of the schools in 30 cooperating cities • Number of responses depending on number of schools in the city

  42. WP2: draft questionnaire Q10 • Building blocks Q10 • Assessment of the current mobility situation in the city • Interest in getting a more sustainable mobility in the city • Identification of supported sustainable mobility measures • Identification of barriers facing the development of a more sustainable mobility • Explanation and knowledge of the CIVITAS Initiative • Interest in CIVITAS Initiative activities

  43. We know it’s a lot…

More Related