Download
1 / 9
90 likes | 208 Vues
Hume's fork. We can only have knowledge of Relations of ideasMatters of factRelations of ideas are a priori and analyticMatters of fact are a posteriori and synthetic. Knowledge of matters of fact. Knowledge of matters of fact is always a posteriori and synthetic. We gain it by using observation and employing induction and reasoning about probability. The foundation of this knowledge is what we experience here and now, or can remember. .
E N D
1. Michael Lacewing How do we know what exists?
Michael Lacewing
enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk
2. Humes fork We can only have knowledge of
Relations of ideas
Matters of fact
Relations of ideas are a priori and analytic
Matters of fact are a posteriori and synthetic
3. Knowledge of matters of fact Knowledge of matters of fact is always a posteriori and synthetic.
We gain it by using observation and employing induction and reasoning about probability.
The foundation of this knowledge is what we experience here and now, or can remember.
4. Causal inference All our knowledge that goes beyond what is present to our senses or memory rests on causal inference.
We cant know what causes what without investigating experience.
5. A priori knowledge of what exists Some rationalists, e.g. Plato and Descartes, challenge Humes claim; we can use reason to prove what exists
A priori demonstration and intuition
Demonstration = deduction
Intuition - e.g. how do you follow an argument?
6. Descartes on the physical world We can be deceived by our senses.
There are no certain indications by which we may clearly distinguish wakefulness from sleep.
7. The cogito I am certain that I think, I exist. I am a thinking thing. But I am not certain I have a body. So I can exist without a body. (A priori reasoning)
