1 / 13

Collimation Depth Calculations for ILC BDS

Collimation Depth Calculations for ILC BDS. Frank Jackson. Latest Versions ILC-BDS. ‘FF9’ deck available at SLAC http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mdw/ILC/Beam_Delivery/20050316/ 20 mrad and 2 mrad x-ing angle schemes Include energy spectrometers Bandwidth has been optimised

nevan
Télécharger la présentation

Collimation Depth Calculations for ILC BDS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Collimation Depth Calculations for ILC BDS Frank Jackson

  2. Latest Versions ILC-BDS • ‘FF9’ deck available at SLAC • http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mdw/ILC/Beam_Delivery/20050316/ • 20 mrad and 2 mrad x-ing angle schemes • Include energy spectrometers • Bandwidth has been optimised • Different designs for 2 mrad extraction • SLAC-EU collaboration, under development

  3. Collimation Depth Calculation • SR must pass through all apertures close to IR • IP beampipe, extraction quadrupoles or the facing final doublet • Use semi-analytic linear calculation routine DBLT by Oliver Napoly (SACLAY) • Calculates SR fan as function of collimation depth • Constrain the fan to pass through IR apertures, solve for collimation depth

  4. DBLT (O. Napoly) Assumptions and Method • Assumes minimal 2-phase collimation • Collimators in phase and 90O out of phase with IP • Assumes mono-energetic halo particles • Track corners of collimated phase space at IP back through final doublet • Use many SR emission points in final doublet x’ x Collimated halo phase space at IP

  5. DBLT Solutions SR profiles y • Aperture constraint satisfied by ellipse of solutions in Nx, Ny space • A different ellipse for every SR emission point in FD • ‘Smallest’ ellipse defines collimation depth Aperture x Possible coll. depth solutions for one emission point Ny X marks solution for square SR profile at aperture For more details see 15 Oct 04 talk http://www.astec.ac.uk/ap/collider/collimmeet05Oct04/index.html Nx

  6. 20 mrad Collimation Issues Aperture list http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/lcd/ipbi/lcws05/maruyama_backgrounds.ppt Last extraction quad is at 47m from IP, 71 mm aperture.

  7. 20 mrad Collimation Issues • Extraction quads extend to ~50m from IP. • How far from IP should SR cleanly pass? • Don’t have good feeling for background effects/back scattering • For depth calculation choose 3 apertures for SR clearance • VTX beampipe at IP • QFEX1A exit (12mm, 5.71 m from IP) • QFEX1C exit (24mm, 9.73 m from IP)

  8. 20 mrad Collimation Solutions VTX beampipe QFEX1A exit QFEX1C exit QFEX1A exit solution Nx = 8.82 xNy= 68.89 y Compare with estimation by optics rescaling from NLC (A. Drozhdin), Nx = 8 x Ny = 57 y Corresponds to spoiler gaps of ax = 1mm, ay = 0.5 mm

  9. 20 mrad SR Fan Envelope • Plot SR fan envelope for 8.82x x 68.89y collimated halo • Demonstrates SR clearance of constraining aperture • Rays are not straight lines in r vs. s space! FD VTX QFEX1-5

  10. 2mrad Collimation Depth • Now non-symmetrical problem • SR fan passes through one or more non-symmetrical apertures, then will hit beam pipe eventually QD0 SR fan centroid IP QD0 Extracted Beam

  11. 2mrad Extraction (Daresbury/Orsay) 500 GeV • What collimation depth to clear QD exit? • Treat as symmetric problem and constrain SR fan with 22 mm symmetrical aperture – to do QD 5.4 m 31 mm Ignore everything afterwards 1.6 mrad 8.8mm SR fan centroid Distance of closest approach ~ 22 mm QD

  12. Other Issues • SR from last bend before final focus may also constrain coll. depth • Have been ignoring effect of local chromaticity correction sextupole • Have been ignoring energy spread of beam halo

  13. Conclusion and Future Work • DBLT gives quick evaluation of collimation depth • Can use as first approximation for spoiler gaps • Fine tuning of collimation depth requires simulation • For example, BDSIM cross check of DBLT incorporating halo energy spread • Broader collimation questions • Collimation performance of whole lattice (STRUCT/BDSIM) • Machine protection issues

More Related