1 / 15

Comparisons of spot vs 24-h urine samples for estimating salt intake

Comparisons of spot vs 24-h urine samples for estimating salt intake. Chen Ji a , Michelle A Miller a , Antonella Venezia b , Pasquale Strazzullo b , and Francesco P Cappuccio a. a University of Warwick, W.H.O Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, Coventry, UK

niveditha
Télécharger la présentation

Comparisons of spot vs 24-h urine samples for estimating salt intake

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparisons of spot vs 24-h urine samples for estimating salt intake • Chen Jia, Michelle A Millera, AntonellaVeneziab, • Pasquale Strazzullob, and Francesco P Cappuccioa a University of Warwick, W.H.O Collaborating Centre for Nutrition, Coventry, UK b Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Italy

  2. Background • In steady state, most of Na eaten in a day is excreted through urine in the following 24-h • 24-h urinary Na excretion ‘gold standard’ for measuring sodium (salt) intake both in individuals and in populations • In large population studies 24-h collections often deemed inconvenient, hence alternative methods suggested (e.g. spot and timed urines) • Their reliability and reproducibility often disappointing

  3. Aim • To assess reliability and reproducibility of estimations of 24-h urinary Na excretion through timed spot urines compared to 24-h Na output in two independent population samples including men and women from different ethnic groups

  4. Data Study 1: Discovery sample 915 British men & women aged 40-59 (297 W, 326 B, 292 SA) Study 2: Validation sample 148 Italian White men aged 32-75 Na, Cr in “independent” 24-h and timed spot urines • Reliability and Reproducibility • Tanaka’s method† • Arithmetic extrapolation method †: Tanaka T et al. J Hum Hyper,2002;16, 97-103.

  5. Methods • Tanaka’s method 24-h Ur Cr ≈ Predicted 24-h Ur Cr 24-h Ur Na/Cr  timed Ur Na/Cr 24-h Ur Na  timed Ur Na/Cr  Predicted 24-h Ur Cr 24-h Ur Na = timed Ur Na  timed Ur Vol  (24-h/timed Ur collection time) • Arithmetic extrapolation method Predicted 24-h Ur Cr ~ Age, Height, Weight

  6. Methods • Tanaka’s method • Spearman’s rank Correlation and Quintile positions comparison • Bland-Altman plot • Graphical comparison • Receiver Operating Characteristic curve & Sensitivity/Specificity • >100 mmol/day as positive • Arithmetic extrapolation method

  7. Results Discovery sample – Correlation by Tanaka’s and Arithmetic methods Tanaka’s method vs Measured 24-h urinary sodium Arithmetic method vs Measured 24-h urinary sodium

  8. Results Discovery sample – Quintile positions by Tanaka’s and Arithmetic methods urinary sodium (mmol/24h) Tanaka’s method Arithmetic method

  9. Results Discovery sample – Bland-Altman plotby Tanaka’s method Estimated - Measured Female Male 95% CI Mean diff 95% CI Overestimation Underestimation Average of estimated and measured 24-h urinary sodium

  10. Results Discovery sample – Bland-Altman plotby Arithmetic method log(estimated) - log(measured) Female Male Average of log (estimated) and log(measured) urinary sodium

  11. Results Discovery sample – ROC, sensitivity/specificityby Tanaka’s method Sensitivity White African origin South Asian Female AUC=0.652 Sensitivity=95.8% Specificity=8.5% AUC=0.550 Sensitivity=100% Specificity=0% AUC=0.631 Sensitivity=95.3% Specificity=6.3% Male AUC=0.538 Sensitivity=100% Specificity=0% AUC=0.521 Sensitivity=100% Specificity=0% AUC=0.582 Sensitivity=100% Specificity=0% 1-specificity Note: Measured 24-h urinary sodium > 100 mmol/day is defined as positive

  12. Results Validation sample – Correlation & Quintile positions Tanaka’s method Arithmetic method

  13. Results Validation sample – Bland-Altman plot & ROC, Sensitivity/specificity Tanaka’s method Arithmetic method Estimated - Measured Log(estimated/measured) Average of methods ROC Curve ROC Curve Sensitivity AUC=0.576 Sensitivity=85.5% Specificity=20.0% AUC=0.649 Sensitivity=100% Specificity=0% 1-Specificity Note: Measured 24-h urinary sodium > 100 mmol/day is defined as positive

  14. Conclusions • Spot timed urinary Na does not provide reliable and reproducible estimates of 24-h urinary Na excretion • 24-h urinary collection for the measurement of urinary Na excretion remains the preferred tool for assessing salt intake

  15. Thank you

More Related