1 / 1

Gaps in Trial Evidence: Assessing Suitability of Observational Studies through Systematic Review

This systematic review examines the evidence gaps in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Controlled Clinical Trials (CCTs), focusing on the validity and usefulness of Observational Studies (OS). It evaluates whether OS address the review question, considers the natural history of the disease or exposure, identifies potential biases, and refocuses the review question on existing gaps.

norton
Télécharger la présentation

Gaps in Trial Evidence: Assessing Suitability of Observational Studies through Systematic Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Always consider: RCTs CCTs Systematic review question (including PICOS) Are their gaps in the trial evidence? Yes No Confine review to RCTs/CCTs Consider OS Will OS provide valid and useful information? Assess the suitability of OS: Natural history of the disease or exposure Potential biases Assess whether OS address the review question Refocus the review question on gaps

More Related