1 / 11

MonteCarlo Optimization (Simulated Annealing)

MonteCarlo Optimization (Simulated Annealing). Mathematical Biology Lecture 6 James A. Glazier. Optimization. Other Major Application of Monte Carlo Methods is to Find the Optimal (or a nearly Optimal) Solution of an Algorithmically Hard Problem.

Télécharger la présentation

MonteCarlo Optimization (Simulated Annealing)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MonteCarlo Optimization(Simulated Annealing) Mathematical Biology Lecture 6 James A. Glazier

  2. Optimization • Other Major Application of Monte Carlo Methods is to Find the Optimal (or a nearly Optimal) Solution of an Algorithmically Hard Problem. • Given want to find that minimizes f. • Definition: then is a Local Minimum of f. • Definition: then is the Global Minimum of f. • Definition: then f has Multiple Degenerate Global Minima,

  3. Energy Surfaces • The Number and Shape of Local Minima of f Determine the Texture of the ‘Energy Surface,’ also called the Energy Landscape, Penalty Landscape or Optimization Landscape. • Definition: The Basin of Attraction of a Local Minimum, is: • The Depth of the Basin of Attraction is: • The Radius or Size of the Basin of Attraction is: • If no local minima except global minimum, then optimization is easy and energy surface is Smooth.

  4. Energy Surfaces • If multiple local minima with large basins of attraction, need to pick an In each basin, find the corresponding and pick the best. Corresponds to enumerating all states if is a finite set, e.g. TSP. • If many local minima or minima have small basins of attraction, then the energy surface is Rough and Optimization is Difficult. • In these cases cannot find global minimum. However, often, only need a ‘pretty good’ solution.

  5. Monte Carlo Optimization • Deterministic Methods, e.g. Newton-Rabson ( ) Only Move Towards BetterSolutions and Trap in Basins of Attraction. Need to Move the Wrong Way Sometimes to Escape Basins of Attraction (also Called Traps). • Algorithm: • Choose a • Start at Propose a Move to • If • If Where,

  6. Monte Carlo Optimization—Issues • Given an infinite time, the pseudo-random walk Will explore all of Phase Space. • However, you never know when you have reached the global minimum! So don’t know when to Stop. • Can also take a very long time to escape from Deep Local Basins of Attraction. • Optimal Choice of g(x) and dwill depend on the particular • If g(x)1 forx<x0, then will algorithm will not see minima with depths less thanx0 . • A standard Choice is the Boltzmann Distribution, g(x)=e-x/T, Where T is the Fluctuation Temperature. The Boltzmann Distribution has right equilibrium thermodynamics, but is NOT an essential choice in this application).

  7. Temperature and d • Bigger T results in more frequent unfavorable moves. • In general, the time spent in a Basin of Attraction is ~ exp(Depth of Basin/ T). • An algorithm with these Kinetics is Called an Activated Process. • Bigger T are Good for Moving rapidly Between Large and Deep Basins of Attraction but Ignore Subtle (less than T) Changes in • Similarly, large d move faster, but can miss deep minima with small diameter basins of attraction. • A strategy for picking T is called an “Annealing Schedule.”

  8. Annealing Schedules • Ideally, want time in all local minimum basins to be small and time in global minimum basin to be nearly infinite. • A fixed value of T Works if depth of the basin of attraction of global minimum>>depth of the basin of attraction of all local minima and radius of the basin of attraction of global minimum~radius of the largest basin of attraction among all local minima. • If so, pick T between these two depths. • If multiple local minima almost degenerate with global minimum, then can’t distinguish, but answer is almost optimal. • If have a deep global minimum with very small basin of attraction (golf-course energy). Then no method helps!

  9. Annealing Schedules • If Energy Landscape is Hierarchical or Fractal, then start with large T and gradually reduce t. • Selects first among large, deep basins, then successively smaller and shallower ones until it freezes in one. • Called “Simulated Annealing.” • No optimal choice of Ts. • Generally Good Strategy: • Start with T~ Df/2, if you know typical values of Df for a fixed stepsize d, or T~ typical f, if you do not. • Run until typical Df <<T. Then set T=T/2. Repeat. • Repeat for many initial conditions. • Take best solution.

  10. Example—The Traveling Salesman Problem • Simulated Annealing Method Works for Algorithmically Hard (NP Complete) problems like the Traveling Salesman problem. • Put down N points in some space: • Define an Itinerary: • The Penalty Function or Energy or Hamiltonian is the Total Path Length for a Given Itinerary:

  11. Example—The TSP (Contd.) • Pick any Initial Itinerary. • At each Monte Carlo Step, pick: • If the initial Itinerary is: • Then the Trial Itinerary is the Permutation: • Then • Apply the Metropolis Algorithm. • A Good Initial Choice of T is: • This Algorithm Works Well, Giving a Permutation with H within a Percent or Better if the Global Optimum in a Reasonable Amount of Time.

More Related