1 / 42

Faster algorithms for string matching problems: matching the convolution bound

Faster algorithms for string matching problems: matching the convolution bound. Piotr Indyk. 報告人 : 蕭志宣 田文錦 王弘倫. Outline. Introduction Randomized Boolean convolution Convolution over GF(2) in O(n)-time Application. Pattern matching. Input: two string t , p (text and patten)

olesia
Télécharger la présentation

Faster algorithms for string matching problems: matching the convolution bound

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Faster algorithms for string matching problems: matching the convolution bound Piotr Indyk 報告人: 蕭志宣 田文錦 王弘倫

  2. Outline • Introduction • Randomized Boolean convolution • Convolution over GF(2) in O(n)-time • Application

  3. Pattern matching • Input: two string t, p (text and patten) • Output: A binary sequence o o[i]=1 if p match t[i] o[i]=0 otherwise

  4. Approach • Brute-force O(mn) time algorithm compares p with each of the string start at t(i), for i=1…n • A well-known algorithm KMP achieve O(m+n)

  5. Fingerprint Approach • A fingerprint function Fp(Z)=Z mod p • Use F and compare F(p) and each of fingerprints F(t(j)) • The Monte Carlo algorithm for pattern matching requires O(n+m) time and has a probability of error O(1/n)

  6. Use boolean convolution for string matching? • Solve application problem

  7. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 Boolean convolution(,) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1

  8. 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 Polynomial convolution(+,)(over GF(2)) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

  9. a b a c c a c b a b a b a c b c a a a a 1 0 0 0 0 String matching VS. Boolean Convolution T Ta 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 P Oa Pa 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Pa not

  10. Boolean convolution u*v v 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 u Can be done in O(nlogn) o 1 1 0 0

  11. Convolution on GF(2) u*v v 1 1 0 0 0 1 u 1 1 0 Can be done in O(n) 0 1 0 0 o’ Different from boolean convolution

  12. Number of 1’s is…. • Odd output of convolution on GF(2) will be the same with boolean convolution • Even the position of 1 might be wrong…

  13. o 1 1 0 0 Randomize? n bit Hamming space • Random choose r from Hn uniformly and conjunct r and u ru Correct boolean convolution output u 1 1 0 v 1 1 0 0 0 1 ru 0 1 0 r 0 1 0 ru 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 o’ Output wrong 0 Output correct 1

  14. Lemma 1 • If(u*v)[i]=0 then o’[i]=0 • If(u*v)[i]=1 then Pr[o’[i]=1]=1/2

  15. Expected error probability of position i after executer d times • o[i]=1 if o’[i]=1 in outcome of one execution • o[i]=0 with error probability of 1/2d

  16. Error probability of convolution • Worst case All position output wrong 0 1/2d per position Probability of outputing a wrong convolution is O(n/2d)

  17. Outline • Introduction • Randomized Boolean convolution • Convolution over GF(2) in O(n)-time • Application

  18. Naturally… • Convolution is like the multiplication of two polynomial. • Therefore, the time complexity of FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) O(nlogn) is an upper bound of convolution.

  19. GF(2) vs. GF(2t) • An element of GF(2t) can be defined as a polynomial of degree less than t over GF(2). • The operation of two elements over GF(2t) corresponds to the operation of two polynomials over GF(2). • e.g.- a, b  GF(2t), ab over GF(2t) corresponds to a(x)b(x) mod u(x) over GF(2), (u(x) is an irreducible polynomial).

  20. O(n)-time algorithm for polynomial multiplication over GF(2) • Step1: Reduce multiplication of p and q to a multiplication of two polynomials p’ and q’ of degree n/t over GF(2t), such that n/t= 2t, for t = O(logn). • Step2: Multiply p’ and q’ over GF(2t).

  21. n=8, t=2 Elements in GF(2) 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 Elements in GF(22)

  22. Step2 • Using O( log ) operations. • Thus we only need to show each operation can be done in O(1) time. • We can view a coefficients over GF(2t) as a polynomial over GF(2). • Therefore, we need to consider addition, multiplication, and modulus of polynomials of degree t over GF(2).

  23. Addition over GF(2t) • Constant time since each element is of size O(logn), thus the addition can be performed in constant time (RAM model).

  24. The more we need to know • Compute the product d(x) of polynomials a(x) and b(x). • Compute d(x) mod u(x), where u(x) is an irreducible polynomial of degree t (which can be found in negligible time during preprocessing)

  25. Main idea • Shift the polynomial u by t/c (instead of 1) position. • There are only c necessary steps. • For each step, we use a lookup table and thus each operation can in constant time.

  26. Multiplication • By FFT, each multiplication can be done in O( log ). • There are (2 )2 possible products. • Thus, we need (2 )2O( log ) = ( ) O( log ) = O(n) to build the lookup table.

  27. Illustration t/c t/c … t/c t/c t/c … t/c

  28. Division • Naturally, we have an O(t) algorithm (for d(x) & u(x) of degree 2t & t, respectively). • For i = 2t-1…t • Step1: check if the ith coefficient of di is 1. • Step2: if so , assign di-1 = di– u; otherwise set di-1 = di.

  29. Illustration Each si has length t/c • d(x) = u(x)s(x)+ k(x) = u(x)(s1(x)+s2(x)+…+sc(x))+k(x) d(x) – u(x)s1(x) = u(x)(s2(x)+…+sc(x))+k(x) … we can compute k(x) after c steps. Constant time Constant time

  30. Lookup table • Each component needs t/c time. • There are O(2t/c) elements (since u is unique, and d has length t/c). • t/c  2t/c ≤ t/c  2t =t/c  n/t = O(n). • Thus, we need O(n) time to build the table.

  31. So far… • We have a O(n) algorithm to multiply two polynomials of degree n over GF(2). • In other semiring, a convolution still needs O(nlogn) time.

  32. Outline • Introduction • Randomized Boolean convolution • Convolution over GF(2) in O(n)-time • Application

  33. String matching with don’t cares T A A D C C G E D A A C D E A C A B A A A * C C P A A D * C * = don’t cares

  34. a b a c c a c b a b a b a c b c a a a a 1 0 0 0 0 String matching VS. Boolean Convolution T Ta 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 P Oa Pa 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 Pa not

  35. Algorithm

  36. T a b * a * b b c P a * b Example a = 101 b = 100 c = 010 * = 000 t1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 t2 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 t3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 a1 0 0 0 0 0 1 a2 0 0 0 0 0 0 p1 1 0 1 a3 0 1 0 0 0 1 p2 0 0 0 p3 1 0 0 a 0 1 0 0 0 1 anot 1 0 1 1 1 0

  37. Analysis(1/2) • Lemma 2For any α>0 there is a constant c>0 such that the occurrence vector generated by the algorithm is correct with probability 1-1/nα Proof: Case 1. if p occurs in t at position i, then aj[i] = 0 with probability 1 for any j = 0…d-1 a * a * * a a *

  38. Analysis(2/2) a = 101 b = 100 c = 010 * = 000 1 0 1 a bnot 0 1 1

  39. Time Complexity O(n) O(log n)

  40. Subset Matching • Input: A set-string T and a set-string P . • Output: All occurrences of P in T. a b c a c b c a c c e f b f b T = a c c b P =

  41. Tree Pattern Matching and Subset Matching in Randomized O(nlog3m) Time, Proc.STOC’97,1997 R.Cole, R. Hariharan Give a very elegant O(nlog2n)-time randomized algorithm for this problem. We can replace the exact computation of boolean convolution by the probabilistic one. => time complexity O(nlogn)

More Related