360 likes | 489 Vues
Explore the trends in voter turnout in the United States from 1900 to 2008. This analysis delves into who votes and who doesn't, examining the potential decline in turnout and its causes. Factors such as voter registration laws, election day barriers, and the impact of felon disenfranchisement are considered. The study also highlights the impact of competition in elections and the effectiveness of proposed measures like Election Day Registration. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving voter engagement and participation.
E N D
One last negative ad • Rated most effective of 2008 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxqjAejRF94
Voter Turnout • Who votes, who doesn’t? • Why? • Why a decline? • Is there a decline? • What proposals to increase turnout?
Voter Turnout in US • Is there a turnout problem? • In US • about 50-55% vote in presidential elections • up in 2004 % 2008 (60%) • about 30% vote in congressional elections • Washington state above the national average
Voter Turnout • In the US • a steady decline (maybe) • turnout 10% lower 2000 than 1960 • turnout much lower now than 1900 • why ?? • today, a lower % of eligible voters participate • farmore eligible voters now
Turnout Trend 1948 - 2000 • High rates 1952 - 1968 • Decline post 1972 M. McDonald data
Turnout Trend through 2008 • Large change in VAP vs. VEP turnout • Since 1980 • Pool of eligible voters smaller vs. voting age population M. McDonald data
Voter Turnout • 1896 90% drop to 62% in 1904 • voter registration laws • Jim Crow laws • 1916 61% drop to 42% in 1920 • suffrage to women • size of eligible electorate doubled • 1936 59% drop to 51% in 1948 • WWII • 1968 60% drop to 52% 1972 • suffrage granted to 18 y/olds
Voter Turnout in US • 1960 = 63% in pres (47% in 1962) • 1964 = 62% in pres (48% in 1966) • 1968 = 61% in pres (47% in 1970) • 1984 = 54% in pres (36% in 1986) • 1988 = 50% in pres (36% in 1990) • 1996 = 49% in pres (36% in 1998) • 2000 = 51% in pres (34% in 2002)
Voter Turnout in US • Why a decline since 1890s? • Old numbers from a different context • high mobilization • labor intensive parties • limited pool of eligible voters • fraud • more mobilization then vs. now?
Voter Turnout in US • Why a declinesince 1960s? • Demise of parties • campaigns now capital intensive (ads) • less direct contacts w/ voters • candidate centered politics • “party building” efforts (soft money) for GOTV had little effect
Voter Turnout in US • Why a decline? • Demise of competition • Fewer US House races competitive now vs. 1960s • even with demise of one-party south • Fewer state legislative seats competitive • Campaign activity concentrated in rare, competitive districts (and states)
Voter Turnout in US • Why a decline? • Demise of Competition • Effects of competition • 10% more competitive presidential race in state = 1% more turnout • ie: Ohio (2%) vs (22%) = 2% more • 2 initiatives = 1% more • Senate race, Gov race...
Voter Turnout in US • Why a decline? • Increase in 2004 & 2008 • Why; stakes higher? • some new issue? • candidate effects?
Voter Turnout in US • Why a decline? • Regulatory barriers • 30 day advance registration • vote only on day of election • must vote at specific location • limits on use of mail, absentee ballots • Prohibition on felons voting
Voter Turnout in US • Why a decline • Regulator barriers • What effects of Election Day Registration (EDR)? • Seven states • 4.5% increase in presidential elections • 2.0% increase in midterm
Voter Turnout in US • Election Day Registration • Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Wyoming (ND doesn’t require registration) • Bill in WA (SB 6778) • 2008 10 days before election • 2009 5 days before • 2010 day of election in WA
Voter Turnout in US • Election Day Registration • Why bother? • makes voting more convenient • Who will take advantage? • ??? • ???
Voter Turnout in US • Election Day Registration • Proponents: • Democratic Party • Opponents: • County Auditors • Bureaucratic nightmare • requires more staff • vote provisional ballot? • check if registered/voted in other county
Voter Turnout • Felon disenfranchisement • Two states do not ban from voting (Maine and Vermont) • Some states restore after release / probation (ex Felons) • Some states make ban permanent (unless govt. approves individual’s restoration)
Voter Turnout • Felon Laws • Adoption corresponds with extension of rights to Black Americans • Before 1860, 12 of 21 states w/ laws • By 1890s, 38 of 45 had laws • another spike in adoption 1960s
Voter Turnout • Effects of Felon laws • There might not be a decline in turnout • Levels of criminal punishment in US way, way up • More felons than ever (Why??) • 1.4% of Voting age pop by 2000 • was .5% before 1982 • 8% of US Voting age population by 2000 • up from 2% in 1966
Voter Turnout in the US • Why a decline • Regulatory Barriers • Not a factor growing over time • Easier to register now, easier to vote by mail • EDR explains variation in an election, not since 1960.
Voter Turnout in US • Maybe no decline? • Yes, lower 1972 than 1948 - 1968 • Decline mostly outside of south • Low turnout rate of young (post 1972) accounts for 1/4 of decline • VAP vs. VEP....
Turnout by Age • Not quite linear • Young voters lowest turnout • Youth vote up in 2004 (red line) & 2008 charles franklin data
Turnout by Age • Youngest cohort largest segment of the electorate • Greatest under-representation in voting
Turnout by Age • Under-representation? • Youth vote by party • 2000 51% Dem • 2004 54% Dem • 2008 66% Dem
Voter Turnout • So why don’t young people vote? • efficacy • life experiences re: politics • campaigns don’t care about them? • MTV ‘Rock to Vote’ a flop? • youth vote way up in place where competitive races (stakes are higher) • youth vote 10% nationally in 2004
Voter Turnout • So, who votes? • See Dalton, Chpt. 3 • Education • Age (old people rule) • Cohort and life cycle effects • Partisans (not independents) • Income (see ‘Big Tilt’) • Efficacy • OK, so what drives efficacy
Voter Turnout • When & Why do they vote? • Regular voters • older people and well educated • Peripheral voters • younger people and less-educated
Voter turnout • Competitive elections mobilize • larger effect on young & less educated • Presidential race 2004 • person living in uncompetitive state w/ 10th grade ed. had .46 prob. of voting • person in Ohio w/ 10th grade ed .55 prob.
Voter Turnout • Midterm election (2002) • 33 y/o person in state w/ no US Senate race = .37 prob. of voting • 33 y/o in state w/ most competitive Senate race .77 prob. of voting • for 62 y.o., high prob. of voting anyway
Voter Turnout in US • What difference would it make if turnout was higher? • Composition of electorate change? • EDR, Vote by Mail, etc. seem to increase turnout but not change electorate • Competitive elections seem to increase turnout of everyone • greater effect on young, less educated
Voter Turnout in US • What happens if higher turnout • and low participating groups show up? • Young people • Less affluent • Ex-felons
Voter Turnout • Uggen & Manza • Because felons are drawn from ranks of poor and racial minorities, laws take votes from Dems. • Estimate that 2000 Pres. election would have been reversed • Estimate that Dems would have controlled US Senate after 1984 if not for these laws • Thus changed composition of US Courts
Young voters nominated Obama • Young voters (under 30 in 2004) • Born post 1975 = 60% D, 30% R • Born 1943 - 58 = 44% D, 46% R • 2008 Primaries • Ds NH 18-24 60% Obama, 22% HRC • Ds NH over 65 32% Obama, 48% HRC • Ds FL 18-24 49% Obama, 39% HRC • Ds FL over 65 24% Obama, 59% HRC • Ds IA 17 - 29 57% Obama, 11% HRC • Ds IA over 65 18% Obama, 45% HRC
Voter Turnout • Dem primaries: Obama won where youth turnout reduced age gap • 28% over 65 in FL, 5 % under 25 • 13% over 65 in NH, 11% under 25 • 25% over 65 in IA, 22% under 27 • 26% over 60 in MI, 8% under 25