1 / 6

Methodist College Belfast Self-Evaluation Presentation December 2012

Methodist College Belfast Self-Evaluation Presentation December 2012. Departmental Self-Evaluation. Each year departments choose a focus from their Departmental Development Plans. They select the sources of evidence from pupil voice, data, pupil work or observation outside PRSD.

osias
Télécharger la présentation

Methodist College Belfast Self-Evaluation Presentation December 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Methodist College BelfastSelf-Evaluation PresentationDecember 2012

  2. Departmental Self-Evaluation • Each year departments choose a focus from their Departmental Development Plans. • They select the sources of evidence from pupil voice, data, pupil work or observation outside PRSD. • Today’s presentation focus = peer observation. Fewer departments selecting it. • However, excellent for sharing good practice and improving learning.

  3. Problems Problems Solutions Research Lesson Study Reduced Paperwork Reducing the expectation of the length of the observation Not part of PRSD Not imposed Not led by senior management but by HOD 1. Time 2. Resistance

  4. Strategies Employed • Pupil Pursuit – KS3 Working Party - Focus on Assessment for Learning. Lots of good feedback, teachers involved enjoyed the experience But - quite expensive, too intrusive, not sustainable. • RLS – GTCNI Pilot with funding attached. Structured, money available, led by teachers, they select the topic. Working in teams, subject based, built in evaluation, excellent staff development. But - what happens when the funding runs out? • Departmental use of peer observation in the way that suits them best. – Buddy system, paperwork light, length of observation can be 10 mins or a whole period, linked to the DDP, so all teachers in the department involved. • Outcome so far - reduced resistance, real focus on learning improvement.

  5. Next Steps • Continue to grow the culture of peer observation. • Two HODs have already shared their approach to peer observation this year with other HODs. • This has stimulated interest in other departments • Use of RLS teams is being developed and the number of teams has grown in the year 2012 - 2013. Could provide an option for HODs to structure their self-evaluation.

More Related