1 / 89

Research Funding Trends: Surviving an NIH Recession

phaedra
Télécharger la présentation

Research Funding Trends: Surviving an NIH Recession

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Research Funding Trends: Surviving an NIH Recession February 14, 2007 AMSPC Annual Meeting Tony Mazzaschi

    2. New England Temperature Conversion Chart 50 F Residents of the Galapagos shiver uncontrollably People in New England sunbathe

    3. New England Temperature Conversion Chart 32 F Floridians don coats, thermal underwear, gloves, wool hats People in New England throw on a flannel shirt

    4. New England Temperature Conversion Chart 0 F Hawaiians escape en masse to Tahiti

    5. New England Temperature Conversion Chart 0 F Hawaiians escape en masse to Tahiti Girl Scouts in New England sell cookies door to door

    6. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 25 F The few people left in Miami die

    7. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 25 F The few people left in Miami die New Englanders close the windows

    8. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 40 F Washington DC runs out of hot air

    9. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 40 F Washington DC runs out of hot air People in New England let the dogs sleep indoors

    10. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 460 F Politicians start putting their hands in their own pockets

    11. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 460 F Politicians start putting their hands in their own pockets People in New England start saying . . . "Cold 'nuff for ya?"

    12. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 500 F Hell freezes over

    13. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 500 F Hell freezes over Red Sox win World Series

    14. New England Temperature Conversion Chart - 500 F Hell freezes over Texas becomes a Blue State

    15. Presentation Outline The Political Landscape NIH Funding The Present and Future Strife, Squabbles, and Opportunities Research Capacity

    16. Election Summary Impact No Democratic Incumbent Lost In The General Election

    17. Congressional Line-Up

    18. Medical Schools By Party Affiliation (U.S. House of Representatives)

    19. Election Summary Impact No Democratic Incumbent Lost In The General Election Urban States and Districts Have Gained Strength

    20. Election Summary Impact No Democratic Incumbent Lost In The General Election Urban States and Districts Have Gained Strength New York, Massachusetts, Maryland and Michigan Are Back

    21. New York Senate Chuck Schumer Conference Vice Chair (3rd in Leadership), DSCC Chair, Finance Cmte. Hillary Rodham Clinton H.E.L.P. Cmte. House Charles Rangel Chair, Ways and Means Cmte.

    22. Massachusetts Senate Edward Kennedy Chair, H.E.L.P. Cmte. John Kerry Finance Cmte. House Edward Markey 3rd Ranking on Energy and Commerce Cmte. Barney Frank Chair, Financial Services Cmte.

    23. Maryland Senate Barbara Mikulski Appropriations Cmte. and H.E.L.P. Cmte. Benjamin Cardin Will be more active in health arena than Sarbanes House Steny Hoyer Majority Leader, 2nd Ranking on Labor-HHS-Education Approps. Subcmte.

    24. Michigan Senate Debbie Stabenow 4th in Party Leadership; Finance Cmte. Member House John Dingell Chair, Energy and Commerce Cmte. John Conyers Chair, Judiciary Cmte.

    25. Election Summary Impact No Democratic Incumbent Lost In The General Election Urban States and Districts Have Gained Strength New York, Massachusetts, Maryland and Michigan Are Back Illinois and California Remain Important

    26. Illinois Senate Dick Durbin Assistant Majority Leader, H.E.L.P. Cmte. Barack Obama H.E.L.P. Cmte. House Rahm Emanuel DCCC Chair, Caucus Chairman, and Ways and Means Cmte.

    27. California Senate Barbara Boxer Chief Deputy Whip Dianne Feinstein Approps. Cmte., Chair, Rules Cmte. House Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House Pete Stark Chair, Ways and Means Subcmte. on Health Henry Waxman Chair, Government Reform Cmte. George Miller Chair, Education and Workforce Cmte.

    28. AAMC Members

    30. Election Summary Impact No Democratic Incumbent Lost In The General Election Urban States and Districts Have Gained Strength New York, Massachusetts, Maryland and Michigan Are Back Illinois and California Remain Important Blue Dog Democrats and Members of the GOPs Main Street Partnership Will Be Major Factors

    31. Physicians in Congress (109th) Bill Frist (R-TN) - transplant surgeon Tom Coburn (R-OK) family medicine Michael Burgess (R-TX) ob-gyn Donna Christian-Christensen (D-VI) family medicine Phil Gingrey (R-GA) ob-gyn Jim McDermott (D-WA) - psychiatrist Ron Paul (R-TX) - ob-gyn Tom Price (R-GA) surgeon Joe Schwarz (R-MI) ENT Vic Snyder (D-AR) family medicine Dave Weldon (R-FL) - internist

    32. Physicians in Congress (110th) Tom Coburn (R-OK) family medicine Michael Burgess (R-TX) ob-gyn Donna Christian-Christensen (D-VI) family medicine Phil Gingrey (R-GA) ob-gyn Jim McDermott (D-WA) - psychiatrist Ron Paul (R-TX) - ob-gyn Tom Price (R-GA) surgeon Vic Snyder (D-AR) family medicine Dave Weldon (R-FL) - internist Steve Kagen (D-WI) allergist

    33. Researchers in Congress (110th) Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) Ph.D. in Human Physiology Vern Ehlers (R-MI) Ph.D. in Nuclear Physics Rush Holt (D-NJ) Ph.D. in Physics 124 Masters 22 Doctorates 178 Law Degrees

    34. Political Control Of The Congress Has Changed . . . But The Nations Budget Situation Has Not!

    35. Baseline Deficit Projections [in billions of dollars]

    36. Baseline Deficit Projections [in billions of dollars]

    37. FY 2006 Spending [outlays]

    38. Medicare and Medicaid [as a % of total mandatory spending]

    41. FY 2007 Presidents Budget Total Discretionary Spending = $870.7 billion (+3.2%) 46% for Domestic Spending = $398.3 billion (-0.5%) 35% for Labor-HHS-Education = $137.8 billion (-2.8%) 18% for NIH = $24.8 billion (0%)

    42. Three Questions That Democrats Must Answer in 110th Congress 1. How large is the pot of discretionary money? 2. How to divide this money among defense, homeland security, and domestic programs? 3. How to divide domestic money among programs (e.g., NIH versus education versus VA healthcare)?

    43. Growth in Discretionary Budget Authority by Major Agency Agency FY07 Cumul. Growth Request 2001-7 Defense $439.3 B 45.2% Education $54.4 B 35.7% HHS $67.6 B 25.2% Homeland Security $30.9 B 121.0% Veterans Affairs $35.7 B 59.5%

    44. Historical NIH Doubling Intervals

    45. NIH Funding, FY 1995-2007 [in billions]

    46. NIH Funding History FYs 1995-2006 [in billions]

    47. NIH Research Project Grants FYs 1996-2006

    48. Success Rates for RPGs FYs 1996-2006

    50. NIH Competing RPGs Applications Per Applicant

    51. FY 2007

    52. FY 2007 Joint Resolution

    53. FY 2007 Joint Resolution

    54. FY 2007 Power Shift

    55. FY 2008

    56. Total RPGs

    57. Training Slots

    58. FY 2008 Advocacy Get NIH Back on Track: Bush proposal = 13% cut in inflation adjusted dollars since FY 2003 Three year plan to restore NIH funding: +6.7 percent in FY 2008, 2009, and 2010 to restore NIH to FY 2003 level Endorsed by: AAMC, Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding, FASEB, National Health Council, Research!America, and the Campaign for Medical Research

    59. BIRDPI

    60. Community Infighting Size and Quality of the Intramural Program (currently 9.7% of NIH budget) The Common Fund/Power of OPASI Head RO1s vs. The Rest of the NIH Budget Basic vs. Translational & Clinical Research? CTSAs The Haves vs. the Have-Nots Priority-setting and disease focus When will IDCs rear its ugly head?

    61. OPASI Office of Portfolio Analysis and Strategic Initiatives ? Division of Program Coordination, Planning and Strategic Initiatives Resource development Program evaluation Strategic coordination

    62. Research Survey Questions

    63. 84 Schools Participated in the study. 20 schools in the sample were among the top 25 in terms of their FY 2005 direct federal grants and contracts. Fixing: E.g., Where debt service started in 2003 at $13M, then $14M, then $150M, then $16M I changed $150M to $15M. Research Faculty went from 0 in 2003 & 2004, to 100+ in each of following years, I made the earlier years equal to 100+ The transition between the Actual & Projected values between 2005 and 2006, sometimes resulted in wildly different values for a handful of schools. When this occurred and I could not come up with a reasonable estimate, I deleted them for a particular analysis for the years in question. 4 Public schools reported 0 F&A recoveries because they remitted to state even though instructions said not to do this. When this happened, I substituted the Off-the-books values for 2003 - 2005, and then used the rate to estimate for 2006-08. 5) FYI: Schools were classified as research intensive if they had $120M+ in direct federal G&C research in FY 2005.Fixing: E.g., Where debt service started in 2003 at $13M, then $14M, then $150M, then $16M I changed $150M to $15M. Research Faculty went from 0 in 2003 & 2004, to 100+ in each of following years, I made the earlier years equal to 100+ The transition between the Actual & Projected values between 2005 and 2006, sometimes resulted in wildly different values for a handful of schools. When this occurred and I could not come up with a reasonable estimate, I deleted them for a particular analysis for the years in question. 4 Public schools reported 0 F&A recoveries because they remitted to state even though instructions said not to do this. When this happened, I substituted the Off-the-books values for 2003 - 2005, and then used the rate to estimate for 2006-08. 5) FYI: Schools were classified as research intensive if they had $120M+ in direct federal G&C research in FY 2005.

    64. Year-to-Year Percent Change in Average Direct - Federal Research Grants & Contracts Even though doubling stopped in 2003, schools still reported substantial growth 10 -12% between 2003-04, and 6-8% between 2004-05. Frankly, I dont entirely understand this. However, whats of interest and concern are schools expectations regarding the growth in funding over the next three years. That is, schools projected growth of 5-6% between 2005-06, in the 2-3% range between 2006-07, and 2-4% range between 2007-08! Even though doubling stopped in 2003, schools still reported substantial growth 10 -12% between 2003-04, and 6-8% between 2004-05. Frankly, I dont entirely understand this. However, whats of interest and concern are schools expectations regarding the growth in funding over the next three years. That is, schools projected growth of 5-6% between 2005-06, in the 2-3% range between 2006-07, and 2-4% range between 2007-08!

    65. Year-to-Year Percent Change in F&A Cost Expenditures- Federal Research Grants & Contracts Again, this shows average year-to-year changes in actual and projected F&A recoveries. So, between 2003 & 04, both cohorts reported increases of around 12%! Between 2004-05, between 4-6%. Projected changes between 2006-07 and 2007-08 are in the 2-4% range. No clear data glitch explaining the average predicted change for the research intensives between 2005 and 2006 approximately 6% Again, this shows average year-to-year changes in actual and projected F&A recoveries. So, between 2003 & 04, both cohorts reported increases of around 12%! Between 2004-05, between 4-6%. Projected changes between 2006-07 and 2007-08 are in the 2-4% range. No clear data glitch explaining the average predicted change for the research intensives between 2005 and 2006 approximately 6%

    66. Change in Average NASF Research Space FY 2003 Base Year (n=82) This slide depicts actual and proposed changes relative to a 2003 base year, the year in which the NIH doubling ended. The data indicate that, on average, the research intensive schools have and/or plan to increase their NASF by a little more than 30% relative to 2003. The comparable number for the Other schools cohort is a little more than 20%This slide depicts actual and proposed changes relative to a 2003 base year, the year in which the NIH doubling ended. The data indicate that, on average, the research intensive schools have and/or plan to increase their NASF by a little more than 30% relative to 2003. The comparable number for the Other schools cohort is a little more than 20%

    67. Change in Average Debt Service - FY 2003 Base Year This slides shows the change in average debt service related to the 2003 base year. So, for the research intensives, the increase from $7M in 2003 to $13M in 2008, represents an 88% increase. Perhaps of greater concern, the increase for the Other Schools cohort from $2.1M in 2003 to $5.4M in 2008, represents about a 250% increase!This slides shows the change in average debt service related to the 2003 base year. So, for the research intensives, the increase from $7M in 2003 to $13M in 2008, represents an 88% increase. Perhaps of greater concern, the increase for the Other Schools cohort from $2.1M in 2003 to $5.4M in 2008, represents about a 250% increase!

    68. Change in Average Research Faculty Headcount FY 2003 Base Year So, between 2003 and 2008, the research intensive schools projected that, on average, they planned to increase their research faculty by about 16%. The Other schools cohort projected an estimated growth of about 14%.So, between 2003 and 2008, the research intensive schools projected that, on average, they planned to increase their research faculty by about 16%. The Other schools cohort projected an estimated growth of about 14%.

    69. Change in Average Grad Students & Post Docs -FY 2003 Base Year For the research intensives, the schools estimated an overall increase of about 8%. However, the Other schools cohort reflects a projected growth of more than 35%!For the research intensives, the schools estimated an overall increase of about 8%. However, the Other schools cohort reflects a projected growth of more than 35%!

    70. NIH Funding, FY 1995-2007 [in billions]

    72. Medical School Objectives Project The MSOP is an initiative designed to reach general consensus within the medical education community on the skills, attitudes, and knowledge that graduating medical students should possess.

    73. Medical School Objectives Project Expert Panel on Education in Safe and Effective Prescribing Practices: What should medical students learn in order to become knowledgeable, safe, and effective prescribers of medications (learning objectives)? What is the ideal educational environment for learning about the optimal prescribing of medications? What kind of educational experiences would allow students to achieve those learning objectives?

    75. New Resources for Chairs

    76. New Resources for Chairs

    77. AAMC Data Book Statistical Information Accredited Schools Applicants and Students Faculty Financing Medical Schools Student Financing Graduate Medical Education Teaching Hospitals Health Care Financing Biomedical Research Physician Services Faculty & Physician Compensation

    78. AAMC Salary Survey By Degree By Rank By Region By Department Mean, Median, 25th and 75th Percentiles

    80. Choose from the report selections to create your own report.Choose from the report selections to create your own report.

    85. Log-In Procedures

    86. Log-In Procedures

    87. Log-In Procedures

    88. Chairs Portal

    89. Other AAMC Information Products AAMC STAT: http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/aamcstat/ Washington Headlines: http://www.aamc.org/advocacy/washhigh/ CASMail, BasicMail & ClinicalMail: CAS@aamc.org

More Related