1 / 17

Performance Based Payments to Physicians in Turkish Public Hospitals: Issues in Impact Assessment

Performance Based Payments to Physicians in Turkish Public Hospitals: Issues in Impact Assessment. Burcay Erus and Ozan Hatipoglu Bosphorus University, Istanbul. Outline. Information on Performance Based Supplementary Payment System in Turkey Impact evaluation-various dimensions Difficulties

phila
Télécharger la présentation

Performance Based Payments to Physicians in Turkish Public Hospitals: Issues in Impact Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performance Based Payments to Physicians in Turkish Public Hospitals:Issues in Impact Assessment Burcay Erus and Ozan Hatipoglu Bosphorus University, Istanbul

  2. Outline • Information on Performance Based Supplementary Payment System in Turkey • Impact evaluation-various dimensions • Difficulties • Methods • Data collection • Simultaneous reforms

  3. Reforms in healthcare • Reform in Healthcare: Transformation in Health • Starting in 2003 • With the support of WB • Aim: increase access and efficiency • Unification of three distinct public health insurance, first steps towards universal coverage • Inclusion of private providers in the public insurance package • New policies in public hospitals to increase efficiency • A family physician system

  4. Performance Based Supplementary Payment System • New compensation scheme for physicians in public hospitals starting in 2004 • Previously • based on salary and limited bonus payments • dual practice allowed and common • anecdotal evidence on problems in access to public hospitals, presence of informal payments

  5. Performance Based Supplementary Payment System-continued • New scheme • Physicians paid bonuses based on points collected throughout the month • From outpatient physical exams, inpatient procedures, tests and diagnoses • Payments from hospital’s receipts after hospital expenses are made • Quality dimension is largely lacking, only broad hospital measures • Patient satisfaction in general, number of exam rooms, etc.

  6. Points-Examples Table translated from MoH presentations on PBSP

  7. Further details: Incentives smaller for dual working physicians: points are multiplied with 0.3 (were 0.4 in the beginning) Administrative and support personnel (not involved in point earning procedures directly) receive supplementary payments based on their title and average points of the physicians There are caps on maximum supplementary payments (e.g. 8 times base salary for specialists)

  8. Anecdotal evidence on impact • More patients treated- • initial analysis of the data shows that outpatients per specialist (full time+dual) doubled • More physicians working full time • MoH statistics indicate an increase from 27% to 80% • Even no vacation taken by physicians • Unnecessary procedures • More drugs prescribed • Drug spending increasing despite considerable decrease in prices

  9. Research objectives • Change in productivity • Impact on quantity • Taking into account selection bias in specialists choice of full-time vs. dual • Impact on quality • No sufficient data-left for further research • Induced demand • Work in progress

  10. Impact assessment-ideal case • Ideal Randomized Controlled Experiment • Physicians assigned to different groups randomly • Data collected for control and treatment groups before and after • Problems • Difficulties in having two different schemes for physicians working together in the same province • Ethical issues-patients treated differentially • Patients’ self selection into physicians • Piloting as an alternative • Differences across pilot provinces • Politicians and reform process eager to move quick-not enough time to observe the impact

  11. In the absence of experiment Limited publicly available data Survey of hospitals available 2001-2006 Use variation in the number of full-time and dual working specialists over time and use fixed effects Deal with selection bias by simultaneously estimating demand for specialist at public hospital

  12. Physician caseload • Ideally to measure physician effort • Payments as a proxy • Specific standard procedures-numbers • We have • Aggregate number of outpatients, inpatients, surgeries (categorized as major, middle, minor) • Issues • Reliability • Lack of detail • Aggregation-no info on value

  13. Number of physicians • Ideally • Individual level physician data • Specific data per specialty, type • Socio-economic characteristics • We have aggregate at hospital level • Problems: • No info on decomposition into full time vs part time yet! • Should be available somewhere but not provided by the Ministry • No info on specialty

  14. Quality • Ideally health outcomes • Hospital mortality • Surveys on health status • Satisfaction • Exam times • … • We have • No data at all on the quality

  15. Hospital characteristics • Ideally would have info on hospital chars that are relevant such as number of beds, infrastructure etc. • We have a limited number of variables • Number of beds

  16. Simultaneous reforms • Simultaneous reforms • Increased demand-number of public insurees increased and access is eased • The number of full-time/dual physicians endogeneous • Data needs • Information on number of insurees lacking-mostly because number of dependents are estimated (4 people per insuree) • The number of those with public insurance for poor is not known for earlier years • Need instruments!

More Related