1 / 44

Load Models for Bridges

Load Models for Bridges. Andrzej S. Nowak University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan. Outline Dead load Live load Extreme load events Load combinations. Load Models. For each load component: Bias factor, l = mean/nominal Coefficient of variation, V = s /mean

pholland
Télécharger la présentation

Load Models for Bridges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Load Models for Bridges Andrzej S. Nowak University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan Outline • Dead load • Live load • Extreme load events • Load combinations

  2. Load Models For each load component: • Bias factor, l = mean/nominal • Coefficient of variation, V = s/mean • Cumulative distribution function (CDF) • Time variation: return period, duration

  3. Statistical Data Base • Load surveys (e.g. weigh-in-motion truck measurement) • Load distribution (load effect per component) • Simulations (e.g. Monte Carlo) • Finite element analysis • Boundary conditions (field tests)

  4. Examples of Load Parameters • Dead load for bridges l = 1.03-1.05 V = 0.08-0.10 • Live load parameters for bridges (AASHTO LRFD Code) l = 1.25-1.35 V = 0.12

  5. No. 4 Stanley Road over I-75in Flint (S11-25032)

  6. Examples of Bias Factors Two bridge design codes are considered: • AASHTO Standard Specifications (1996) • AASHTO LRFD Code (1998) For the first one, denoted by HS20, bias factor is non-uniform, so design load in LRFD Code was changed, and the result is much better.

  7. Two trucks side-by-side

  8. Bias Factor for Load Effect • Bias factors shown previously were for lane load (bridge live load) • For components (bridge girders), bias factor can be very different

  9. Girder Distribution Factors • What is the percentage of lane load per girder? • Is the actual distribution the same as specified by the design code? • What are the maximum strains? • What is the load distribution factor for one lane traffic and for two lanes

  10. Code-Specified GDF -AASHTO Standard (1996) Steel and prestressed concrete girders One lane of traffic Two lanes of traffic S = girder spacing (m)

  11. Code-specified GDF -AASHTO LRFD (1998) One lane Two lanes

  12. Dynamic Load • Roughness of the road surface (pavement) • Bridge as a dynamic system (natural frequency of vibration) • Dynamic parameters of the vehicle (suspension system, shock absorbers)

  13. Dynamic Load Factor (DLF) • Static strain or deflection (at crawling speed) • Maximum strain or deflection (normal speed) • Dynamic strain or deflection = maximum - static • DLF = dynamic / static

  14. Code Specified Dynamic Load Factor • AASHTO Standard (1996) • AASHTO LRFD (1998) • 0.33 of truck effect, no dynamic load for the uniform loading

  15. Load Combinations • Load combination factors can be determined by considering the reduced probability for a simultaneous occurrence of time-varying load components • So called Turkstra’s rule can be applied

  16. Turkstra’s Rule • Consider a combination of uncorrelated, time-varying load components Q = A + B + C • For each load component consider two values: maximum and average. Then, Qmax = maximum of the following: (Amax + Bave + Cave) (Aave + Bmax + Cave) (Aave + Bave + Cmax)

More Related