1 / 1

Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness in Experimental Materials: Filler vs. Matrix Areas

This study investigates the surface roughness (Ra) of experimental materials, focusing on the filler and matrix areas. The results indicate that the Ra of the filler area is significantly larger than that of the matrix area for FL-30 and FC-30 materials. Conversely, the matrix areas of FL-30 and FC-30 exhibit similar Ra values comparable to the Ra of sample F-0. Overall, the Ra values for FL-30 and FC-30 are nearly equivalent to those of a PTFE plate, providing insights into the texture characteristics of these materials.

pia
Télécharger la présentation

Comparative Analysis of Surface Roughness in Experimental Materials: Filler vs. Matrix Areas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. filler area filler area matrix area matrix area Sup-Fig. 1. Surface roughness (Ra) of the experimental materials on area based analysis. Ra of filler area was significantly larger than Ra of matrix area in case of FL-30 and FC-30. Matrix area of FL-30 and FC-30 had similar value with Ra of F-0. While, overall Ra value of FL-30 and FC-30 was almost same as Ra of PTFE-Plate.

More Related