pilis
Uploaded by
17 SLIDES
316 VUES
170LIKES

TIP Universe and Proposed Evaluation Updates

DESCRIPTION

This document outlines the proposed updates to the Transportation Investment Program (TIP) evaluation criteria, discussed in the meeting on December 7, 2017, led by Alexandra Kleyman. Key topics include the revised TIP schedule, modifications in evaluation goals for safety, equity, and economic vitality, and the expected outcomes for fiscal years 2019-2023. The changes aim for clearer methodologies, improved data communication, and enhanced transparency in the TIP databases. The meeting also provided a platform for questions and feedback on these adjustments.

1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

TIP Universe and Proposed Evaluation Updates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

Playing audio...

  1. TIP Universe and Proposed Evaluation Updates December 7, 2017 Alexandra Kleyman

  2. Agenda • TIP Schedule • Draft Universe and Discussion • Proposed Updates to TIP Project Evaluation Criteria • What were the goals? • What are the proposed changes? • What are the results?

  3. FFYs 2019 – 2023 TIP Universe

  4. By Sub-Region and Evaluation Status

  5. By LRTP Investment Program

  6. Questions?

  7. FFYs 2019 – 2023 Evaluate Criteria Updates

  8. What are the proposed changes? • Safety: use intersection and corridor segment crash rates instead of EPDO rate • Equity: eliminate minimum population requirement • Economic Vitality: weight all non-motorized modes the same for Serves Targeted Development Site criteria

  9. What are the results? • Repeatable methodology with clearly defined data needs and sources • Clear proponent guide and questionnaire to communicate data needs • Transparent and reorganized online and internal TIP databases • Minor change in some project scores

  10. Questions?

  11. Appendix

  12. Safety: Corridor Crash Rates

  13. Safety: Intersection Crash Rates

  14. Equity

  15. Economic Vitality

More Related