1 / 21

Flipping in statistics teaching for psychologists

Flipping in statistics teaching for psychologists. Rory Allen. Why did I do it?. In the year 2011-2012, I was given three masters classes in statistics to teach.

pravat
Télécharger la présentation

Flipping in statistics teaching for psychologists

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Flipping in statistics teaching for psychologists RoryAllen

  2. Why did I do it? • In the year 2011-2012, I was given three masters classes in statistics to teach. • In term 1, this involved 4 hours a week class time for each masters course, repeating the same class three separate times: 12 hours of contact time per week. • This included computer demonstrations with SPSS.

  3. I was bored at having to repeat material, and students suffered in two ways: • Those with language or note-taking problems found it hard to keep up, • SPSS procedures cannot easily be recorded in writing.

  4. “Yet I was driven to it, and good was thus done to me” Saint Augustine • I had been aware of screencasting from my own use of the internet • I obtained a learning and teaching fellowship from GLEU at Goldsmiths to screencast the lectures and SPSS demos for the year 2012-2013. • Used Camtasia Studio 7, simple and intuitive software. • Decided to have one class as a “control group”: traditional lectures, and remaining two as “experimental group”.

  5. At this stage I did not use full flipping (student resistance, lack of confidence) • But simply made the screencasts available to the “treatment” group and not to the controls. • Nevertheless the exam results showed a benefit to those with access to the screencasts:

  6. Results I

  7. Results II

  8. There were 7% better marks in treatment vs control class in 2013, • And significantly higher pass rates in treatment class vs control class • But results were not spectacular: half measures leading to half success?

  9. 2013/14 vs 2012/13: The Full Monty • Difference this year: only teaching two classes, • Teaching by flipping, so that students were told they had to watch the screencast in advance.

  10. Results

  11. Results

  12. Results

  13. Benefits • A 15% improvement in exam marks as result of flipping, statistically significant. • A happier (certainly less bored) lecturer! • Once screencasts are done, the investment will pay off for years in topics where there tends to be little change year on year (certainly for stats). • Screencasts can be drawn on for MOOCs.

  14. Problems • The exam will now be seen as not hard enough; • clustering round high scores does not allow for distinguishing between students who are merely good and those who are exceptional. • Though the exam can be made more challenging for next year, and additional, practical SPSS exam can be included.

  15. Problems • It takes a large investment of time to screencast lectures; • AND there will be a temptation for departments to think they can cut costs by reducing expensive lecturing time.

  16. Lessons learned • Flipping can work, and is especially good for subjects which are unpopular and hard for students to grasp. • Probably works because procedures are available on podcast for multiple access, students can follow demonstration, pause, self-test. • Students like podcasts at revision time.

  17. Lessons learned • Demonstrations in class can deliver an idea in multiple modalities: eg regression towards the mean. • Quizzes in class encourage active involvement of students.

  18. Lessons learned • Quizzes on VLE encourage students to use self-testing: demonstrably the most effective revision tool (Dunlosky et al., 2013). • It is more effective for students to re-visit at intervals material previously taught, rather than being taught material in one solid block after another: “distributed practice” and “interleaved practice” are far the most effective ways of reinforcing effective learning (Dunlosky et al., 2013).

  19. References • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K., Marsh, E., Nathan, M., and Willingham, D. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58. • Flora, C. (2012). Students flipping over new teaching style. The Explorer News. Downloaded from http://explorernews.com/news/article_81c71a36-4165-11e1-93d2-001871e3ce6c.html • Peterson, E. (2007). Incorporating screencasts in online teaching. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Downloaded from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/495/935 • Pinter-Grover, T., Millunchick, J., and Bierwert, C. (2008). Work in progress – using screencasts to enhance student learning in a large lecture material science and engineering course. 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY.

  20. Acknowledgements • GLEU for providing the fellowship funding, • to the Psychology Department for paying for the podcasting software – Camtasia Studio • Rob Davis and Ian Hannent in the department for setting up the sound recording system • Mira Vogel for her extensive help and advice in using learn.gold to deliver the material.

  21. Any questions?

More Related