1 / 5

Panel Discussion

This panel discussion highlights the areas not sufficiently addressed by the EO community in climate monitoring and adaptation, including data provision, products for exposure and vulnerability, and enhancing the use of climate data records. It also discusses missed opportunities, untapped potential where GEO can provide added value, the need for coordination mechanisms, and building external partnerships.

psims
Télécharger la présentation

Panel Discussion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Panel Discussion Key Points • PROGRAMMATIC GAPS • What are areas not sufficiently addressed by the EO community? 1 • GEO throughitsconvening power canhelptoreachhigher national levels in a diversityofministries • Data themes: Climateimpactmeasurements (e.g. ecosystems, cropyields, health, oceanbiology..) • Data provisionbeyondmet/climatedomainterrestrialareas(e.g. ecology, permafrostandglaciers) • Products forExposureandVulnerability • Enhancinguseofclimatedatarecords in applications / valuechain • Maing National delegatesawareof international EO effortsandProgammes • Understandclimatemonitoringneeds at the regional level; monitoringadaptationtoclimatechange

  2. Panel Discussion Key Points • PROGRAMMATIC GAPS • What are areas not sufficiently addressed by the EO community? 1 • More focusneeded on layerbetweendataandpolicyneeds • Approach tocarbonneeds also focus on developingoperational capacities • Data rescue • Uncertaintitiesaroundusefulnessofdata (moreguidanceneeded)  opportunities • High-resdata/localdatatosupportadaptation , additional requirements

  3. Panel Discussion Key Points • MISSED OPPORTUNTIES • Where is untapped potential where GEO can provide added value? 2 • Lots of synergies still to be exploited on data sharing  joint advocacy • GEO communitytotakeadvantageof OSCAR databaseand ECV Inventory • Integrationbetweenweather/climatedataandothergeospatialandsocio-eoonomicdata (e.g. population, landuse, borders) • Data acesstoin situ datafrom WMO neededtomakeeffectiveusewithin GEO • Riskassessmentstoguideadaptationmeasures • Assessingprogress on adaptation; providesupplementaryguidancetotheadapationprocess on theuseof EO

  4. Panel Discussion Key Points • COORDINATION • Is there a need for an additional coordination mechanism internally in GEO? 3 • Develop case studies within GEO activities how the entire value chain is being addressed (observations > dataset > applications > decisions) • Opportunitiesforcoordinationacross different GEO activities: Sealevelrise; flooding; interfaceswith GEO4Health, bring on boardmorecommunities • Pilots to address adaptation issues • A cross-cutting climate coordination activity should be established by nominating focal points for each activity

  5. Panel Discussion Key Points • PARTNERSHIPS • Which external partnerships need to be built to add value? 4 • UNFCCC has Constituted Bodies in areas such as Adaptation, Loss&Damage, CapD build interfaces between these stakeholder groups and GEO • Documents on specific needs by Parties available  make connection with GEO • Hold regional workshops with stakeholders

More Related