1 / 44

Right-Turn Traffic Volume Reduction in Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis: A Delay Perspective

Research Project for Nevada Department of Transportation. Right-Turn Traffic Volume Reduction in Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis: A Delay Perspective. Present e r: Cui Zhou University of Nevada, Reno Center for Advanced Transportation Education and Research March 27 , 2014.

quana
Télécharger la présentation

Right-Turn Traffic Volume Reduction in Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis: A Delay Perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Research Project for Nevada Department of Transportation Right-Turn Traffic Volume Reduction in Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis: A Delay Perspective Presenter: Cui Zhou University of Nevada, Reno Center for Advanced Transportation Education and Research March 27, 2014

  2. Presentation Overview • Introduction • Previous Research • ITE Community Discussion • Problems in Existing Methods • Proposed Methodology • Case Study • Summary and Conclusions

  3. Introduction • Importance of Traffic Signal Warrants • What’s traffic signal warrants? Standard: An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified at a particular location.

  4. Introduction • Importance of Traffic Signal Warrants • What’s traffic signal warrants? Standard: An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified at a particular location. • Consequences of an unwarranted signal • Rear-end collisions • Excessive delay and congestion • Disobedience of signals

  5. Introduction • Importance of Traffic Signal Warrants • What’s traffic signal warrants? Standard: An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the location shall be performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified at a particular location. • Consequences of an unwarranted signal • Rear-end collisions • Excessive delay and congestion • Disobedience of signals • In short, traffic signals should be only installed when they will alleviate more problems than they induce.

  6. Introduction • Right-turn Traffic in Traffic Signal Warrants

  7. Introduction • Right-turn Traffic in Traffic Signal Warrants

  8. Introduction • Right-turn Traffic in Traffic Signal Warrants • MUTCD and MTSD have clearly stated that some portion of the right-turn traffic should be reduced from the minor street traffic count.

  9. Previous Research Right-turn adjustments are usually based on engineering judgment (EJ), field observation (FO), or an accepted right-turn adjustment methodology (AM).

  10. Previous Research Right-turn adjustments are usually based on engineering judgment (EJ), field observation (FO), or an accepted right-turn adjustment methodology (AM).

  11. ITE Community Discussion Our topic was posted in the ITE community discussion section in October 2013and eight responses were received in this survey

  12. Problems In Existing Methods • Most of them are based on engineering judgments

  13. Problem In Existing Methods • Most of them are based on engineering judgments • Pagones Theorem and NCHRP methods are relatively sound

  14. Problem In Existing Methods • Most of them are based on engineering judgments • Pagones Theorem and NCHRP method are relatively sound • The intersection’s LOS after reduction is often one alphabet better • Pagones Theorem fails to take into account the uneven volume distribution • The NCHRP method works out the reduction based on the conflicting major-road. It doesn’t give any thought to the through and left turn traffic

  15. Methodology • The approach is based on delay equivalence • Find the delay equivalent relationship between right-turn and through traffic

  16. Methodology • The approach is based on delay equivalence • Find the delay equivalent relationship between right-turn and through traffic

  17. Methodology • The approach is based on delay equivalence • Find the delay equivalent relationship between right-turn and through traffic • The estimation of control delay is implemented in VBA programming in EXCEL according to HCM 2010

  18. Methodology • An isolated intersection is studied Directional ratio= WB Volume: EB Volume

  19. Methodology • An isolated intersection is studied • Five minor-street lane conditions are discussed

  20. Condition 1 • Different traffic volume scenarios are applied (12,096 cases in total)

  21. Condition 1 • Different traffic volume scenarios are applied (12,096 cases in total) One Study Situation 20% LT

  22. Condition 1 • Different traffic volumes scenarios are applied (12,096 cases in total) • The reduction factor could be calculated:

  23. Condition 1 The reduction factor graph in one specific study situation where the mainline volume is 500 vph with 1:1 directional ratio

  24. Condition 1 The reduction factor graph in one specific study situation where the mainline volumes are 500 vph with 1:1 directional ratio

  25. Condition 1 • Reduction Factor Table

  26. Condition 2 • Using the same traffic volume scenarios, almost the same reduction factors are obtained • From here, we could also see that the assumed left-turn percentage doesn’t significantly affect the equivalent results

  27. Condition 3 • 20 left turns and zero through traffic are assumed before reduction. The right-turn movement volume is from 50 vph to 510 vph with 20 vphincrement • The adjusted minor street volume is the maximum of adjusted right-turn and through & left-turn traffic ( critical volume)

  28. Condition 3 • Reduction Factor Table

  29. Condition 4 • Minor street left-turn and through volume is from 40 vph to 700 vph with 20 vph increment • Reduction factor graph when the mainline volume is 500 vph.

  30. Condition 4 • Minor street left-turn and through volume is from 40 vph to 700 vph with 20 vph increment • Reduction factor graph when the mainline volume is 500 vph.

  31. Condition 4 • Reduction Factor Table

  32. Condition 5 • Because there is exclusive left-turn lane, left-turn traffic is not considered in this condition. • Reduction Factor Table

  33. Case Study • 26 intersections’ turning volumes provided by NDOT • According to 8 hour warrant in MUTCD, divide these cases into three categories: • warrant meets without right turning (7 cases); • warrant doesn’t meet with all turning movement (12 cases); • warrant meets when considering all turning movement (7 cases)

  34. Case Study • 26 intersections’ turning volumes provided by NDOT • According to 8 hour warrant in MUTCD, divide these cases into three categories: • warrant meets without right turning (7 cases); • warrant doesn’t meet with all turning movement (12 cases); • warrant meets when considering all turning movement (7 cases)

  35. Case Study: Lamoille Hwy and Spring Creek Pkwy Lamoille Hwy Spring Creek Pkwy

  36. Case Study: Lamoille Hwy and Spring Creek Pkwy

  37. Case Study: US395 and Airport Rd US395 Airport Rd

  38. Case Study: Lamoille Hwy and Spring Creek Pkwy

  39. Summary and Conclusions • Unwarranted traffic signals are detrimental

  40. Summary and Conclusions • Unwarranted traffic signals are detrimental • Engineers agree on reducing right-turn volumes, but there is no mature guidance

  41. Summary and Conclusions • Unwarranted traffic signals are detrimental • Engineers agree on reducing right-turn volumes, but there is no mature guidance • This paper proposed a new guideline which is based on the equivalent relation when rightturnsand through traffic achieve the same delay

  42. Summary and Conclusions • Unwarranted traffic signals are detrimental • Engineers agree on reducing right-turn volumes, but there is no mature guidance • This paper proposed a new guideline which is based on the equivalent relation when right turns and through traffic achieve the same delay • Five conditions are divided, and further 63 study situations are providedin each condition

  43. Summary and Conclusions • Unwarranted traffic signals are detrimental • Engineers agree on reducing right-turn volumes, but there is no mature guidance • This paper proposed a new guideline which is based on the equivalent relation when rightturnsand through traffic achieve the same delay • Five conditions are divided, and further 63 study situations are providedin each condition • Case studies were conducted. The proposed guideline can easily help engineers make sound decisions for the adjustment of right turns

  44. Thank you for listening! Suggestions and Questions?

More Related