1 / 18

M3(IFG)/BLM PROPOSED LAND EXCHANGE

M3(IFG)/BLM PROPOSED LAND EXCHANGE. AN M3 EAGLE LLC PROPOSAL. Kurt Pavlat. Acting Field Manager Coeur d’Alene Field Office kpavlat@blm.gov (208) 769-5038. Land Exchanges. Federal Land Policy & Management Act, as amended Five Requirements Consistent with land use plan

quilla
Télécharger la présentation

M3(IFG)/BLM PROPOSED LAND EXCHANGE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. M3(IFG)/BLM PROPOSED LAND EXCHANGE AN M3 EAGLE LLC PROPOSAL

  2. Kurt Pavlat Acting Field Manager Coeur d’Alene Field Office kpavlat@blm.gov (208) 769-5038

  3. Land Exchanges Federal Land Policy & Management Act, as amended Five Requirements Consistent with land use plan Public interest will be well served Title to land or interest in land Values shall be equal or equalized Citizenship

  4. Land Use Plans Framework for land ownership adjustments Serve as a screening mechanism Identifies lands as potentially suitable for disposal Identifies disposal and acquisition criteria

  5. Land Exchanges Must evaluate & consider a full range of disposal & acquisition tools Exchanges are one of the tools used to: Consolidate land ownership Secure important objectives: enhance, develop, protect Meet needs of communities Promote multiple use management

  6. Exchange Process Developing Exchange Proposals Informal discussions at the Field Office level Preliminary Screening –Consider all interests in land and all resources (existing uses/users, access, minerals, cultural, Tribal, timber, grazing, water rights, etc.) Ensure exchange reflects the BLM’s needs & priorities Public interest determination – early, often, throughout

  7. Exchange Process Feasibility Report & Agreement to Initiate Funding & staffing Roles, responsibilities, timeframes Complex land transactions Deliberative Process

  8. North Idaho Perspective Land Use Plan Criteria High-value timberlands & growing sites Special Recreation Mgmt Areas Riparian & wetland habitat Public or administrative access Traditional cultural uses/significant sites Consolidate for management efficiency Municipal watersheds Special Status Species Special designation areas

  9. PROPOSED LANDS INVOLVED • Private land offered to the BLM: approximately 11,038 acres in 3 tracts (all located in Boise District). • Tract 1: 9,638 acres at Harris Creek • Tract 2: 560 acres at Cartwright Canyon • Tract 3: 840 acres adjacent to Stack Rock

  10. PROPOSED LANDS INVOLVED • Public land selected in northern Idaho: 73 parcels, approximately 8,891 acres • 8,091 acres -Coeur d’Alene Field Office • 800 acres -Cottonwood Field Office • M3 would immediately sell acquired public lands to Idaho Forest Group

  11. ISSUES • Preliminary Exchange Proposal – did not consult with or involve the Coeur d’Alene District BLM to develop the concept • Loss of potential to acquire other lands in northern Idaho • Unplanned, unfunded workload • Public access issues – hunting, fishing, & other uses • Coeur d’Alene Tribe - conditional support • Nov. 1 – complete initial review parcel-by-parcel

  12. ISSUES • In accordance with the CDA RMP, disposal lands in N. Idaho to be utilized for wildlife, wetlands, riparian and water-based recreation acquisitions for the N. Idaho public. • History of land ownership adjustments in N. Idaho • State in-lieu selections • Legislated land exchanges • Land exchanges, sales, acquisitions

  13. ISSUES • Public Benefits • Staffing • Workload • Timing • Low current timber values – best interest of the public? • RAC Involvement • Public Input • NEPA

  14. Questions?

More Related