This lecture analyzes euthanasia through various lenses, including ethical, medical, and philosophical dimensions. It distinguishes between the roles of agents and subjects in euthanasia versus suicide, examines the intention and motive behind euthanasia, and considers the outcomes of such decisions. The discussion includes specific cases of active and passive euthanasia, the importance of intent in medical decisions, and the ethical implications concerning dignity and end-of-life care. It further explores arguments for and against voluntary euthanasia in the context of personal suffering and dignity.
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
F I N
Plus de contenu associé
Transcription de la présentation
Lecture 8 Euthanasia Medical and Philosophical Perspectives Nov 2006
Component 1: Agent and subject? • Agent of death ≠ subject of death euthanasia • Agent of death = subject of death suicide
Component 2:Intention of the agent? • To bring about the quick and painless death of the subject euthanasia • To relieve the subject’s pain merely (though death is foreseen) ≠ euthanasia (e.g., administration of morphine, tranquilizer)
Component 3: Motive of the agent? • Benevolent – concern for the subject’s best interest euthanasia • Malevolent – concern for the agent’s own interests murder
Component 4: Causal proximity? • The agent’s act causes the subject’s death euthanasia • The agent provides environmental factors, but the subject’s death is caused by his or her own action assisted suicide • The agent’s act allows an imminent death arrive unhindered let die (e.g., forgoing futile life-sustaining treatment)
Doctor Assisted Suicide • Oregon, USA • Northern Territory, Australia, July 1, 1996 – March 24, 1997 • Dr. Philip Nitschke
Component 5: Outcome? • The subject indeed dies • Otherwise, this is only an euthanasia attempt
NB: final phase of a terminal illness • It is not a component in this notional analysis of euthanasia • It can be used as a criterion of admitting patients to this procedure
Active euthanasia • Terminating life via action • Causing death by commission • Dying and death occur as a causal consequence of an action • E.g., lethal injection
Passive euthanasia • Terminating life via inaction • Causing death by omission • Dying and death occur as a causal consequence of an inaction • E.g., starving a Downs Syndrome baby who is dependent on you for feeding • E.g, Taiwan: wife of a medical doctor • (NB: the motives are not necessarily benevolent)
How about the case of Terri Schiavo (2005)? Response or reflex?In this image taken from four hours of videotape, the Schindlers argued that Terri was able to respond to her mother.
Aussie Senate Cmt, 1997 • “With very few exceptions, pro-euthanasia submissions which dealt with the term ‘dignity’ described particular physical circumstances and described living or dying in such circumstances as necessarily involving a loss of dignity. These circumstances regularly included loss of continence and mobility…..
“A disturbing equation is thus drawn between having ‘dignity’ and being ‘without disability’…. Any notion that those who choose the path of natural death or those who choose to live with disabilities are in some way taking the less dignified path should be abhorrent to any caring society. • Unfortunately, the attitude from certain quarters that dying with dignity demands that life ends before such circumstances begin carries a message which only serves to devalue those who live in such circumstances” (p.126)
Morrie Schwartz • “it’s the ultimate sign of dependency. Someone wiping your bottom.” • Felt a little ashamed because of our culture • Ignore the culture • Began to enjoy; it’s like going back to being a child again – bathing, lifting, wiping you • We all yearn in some way to return to those days when we were completely taken care of – unconditional love, unconditional attention. Most of us didn’t get enough.
Dr. Helga Kuhse, Monash Univ. • “A dignified death is one which accords with the patient’s values and beliefs, a death that does not contradict the patient’s own view of what it means to lead a good human life and die a dignified death. A mode of dying that is prescribed by the imposition of the moral or religious beliefs of others is not a dignified death – even if it is relatively pain-free.” (Quoted from Euthanasia Laws Bill, 1997, p.61) • An even more extreme view !
Echoes with other bioethical views • “To be human is to be in control” • Death control as well as birth control • Human-controlled death is better than a natural death (盡其天年 接受命運擺佈) • Voluntary euthanasia is a human right!
Right to euthanasia • Legal right – legalization of euthanasia • Moral right – euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible, though still might be illegal • Voluntariness – genuine? Or under pressure? • Example:
Connexion au compte
Connectez-vous pour publier votre contenu sur SlideServe.