SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Emotion Annotation and Discourse Synergy Trends - SIGDIAL 2003 Panel Review

riley-rhodes avatar
8 diapositives · 166 Views · Oct 31, 2014

Explore pragmatic discourse paradigms, corpuses, and tools at SIGDIAL 2003, highlighting attitude, affect, time, style in dialogue research. Learn about emotion annotation in text and dialog, integrating work in modalities.

Emotion Annotation and Discourse Synergy Trends - SIGDIAL 2003 Panel Review - slide 1
1 / 8

Télécharger la présentation

Emotion Annotation and Discourse Synergy Trends - SIGDIAL 2003 Panel Review
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Paradigms, Corpora, and Tools in Discourse and Dialog Research Panel at SIGDial 2003 Janyce Wiebe University of Pittsburgh

  2. Pragmatic Aspects of Discourse and Dialog • Attitude and affect (subjectivity, emotion, opinion, …) • Time (tense, aspect, temporal coherence) • Style

  3. Attitude and Affect in Discourse • Question answering systems should distinguish between factual and speculative answers • Multi-perspective QA aims to present multiple answers based on opinions from various sources • Multi-document summaries should summarize multiple views • “Camps” in on-line discussions and finding reviews • Adapting dialog managers when problematic emotions in task-oriented dialogs • Adapting pedagogical strategy when positive or negative emotions in tutorial systems

  4. Annotation and Corpora • Corpus annotated for subjectivity (emotions, evaluations, speculations) in text • Recent work annotating emotions in dialog • Synergy between text and dialog • Research direction: integrating work in the two modalities

  5. Example meeting transcript m053_6_0097_COU_00: • hm . • <P> I remember that , <P> reading about that . m053_5_0098_ZMW_00: • so , it is so easy to get new people ? • f= <*T>t m053_4_0099_MTY_00: • no , it is not , but you know , I mean . • <B> -/I think if/- <uh> <P> yeah , so would happen if the airline pilots threatened to strike ? • <B> I think the consumers would be more angry than the +/airliners/+ +/a=/+ airlines , you know . • and <uh> +/the/+ the people simply would not listen when the pilots would say , look , we're doing this for you . • <P> <uh> the% public would say , get back to work , you slackers , you know .

  6. Examples “They have to be so middle of the road , that they have to look like a stripe.” subjective “I'm gonna minimize this.” objective

  7. Agrawal et al. (WWW03) Gordon et al. (ACL03) Hong, Hatzivassiloglou, McKeown (ACL97, EMNLP03) Pang et al. (EMNLP02) Riloff, Wiebe, Wilson (EMNLP03,CoNLL03,SIGdial03) Spertus (IAAI97) Tong (SIGIR01 workshop) Turney (ACL02) Wiebe et al. (ACL88 … ARDA AQUAINT NRRC 2002) Sample References: Subjectivity Analysis

  8. Sample References: Emotion in Dialog • Aist et al. (ITS02) • Ang et al. (ICSLP02) • Batliner et al. (ISCA00 workshop) • Craggs and Wood (SIGdial03) • Iwahashi (SIGdial03) • Litman, Forbes, Silliman (HLT-NAACL03) • Litman, Hirschberg, Swerts (ACL01) • Narayanan (ISLE02)