Mission Module RFP N65236-07-R-0259 Team Stanley Kick Off

1. Mission Module RFP N65236-07-R-0259Team Stanley Kick Off Presented by: Mike Kaszubinski Date 7 December 2007

2. Agenda • Opening Remarks Mike Kaszubinski • Other Factors Volume Mike Kaszubinski / George Heim • Business Volume Renee Sanders

3. Mission Module Support Proposal • We welcome back old friends and new associates • Re-Compete of 09C Corporate Production • This opportunity is full and open • CPFF / CPIF / FP Delivery Orders • Significant small business goals • We want and need your help! • Significant Sub Contractors = 10% of work • Cost will be #1 selection criteria • Corporate experience contribution

4. Stanley Points of Contact

6. Offerors (prime and significant subcontractors) shall submit the information below pertaining to relevant Corporate Experience using the Reference Information Sheets provided as Attachment 1A and 1B. Offerors are to address all of the Statement of Work paragraphs listed on Attachment 1B, Reference Information Sheet-Contract Specific Data. The offerors shall submit data on current contracts performed by the offeror and/or its proposed significant subcontractors for efforts similar and relevant to the requirements of this Request for Proposal. As noted below, no more than 5 individual contract references may be submitted. Current is defined as a contract performed within the last five (5) years. Relevant is defined as a contract equal to or exceeding $20 million (prime contractor) for efforts similar in scope to the requirements of this Request for Proposal. The more relevant and similar the work performed for this reference is, the more valuable the experience is to the Government. A significant subcontractor is defined as a subcontractor that will be performing at least ten percent (10%) of the total proposed labor hours. For significant subcontractors, a relevant contract is equal to or exceeding $3 million. This data shall be submitted for no more than five (5) of the most current and relevant contracts for the prime contractor and for no more than five (5) of the most current and relevant contracts for each significant subcontractor. In the case of orders under GSA contracts and/or BPA’s, an individual order which meets the definition of “current and relevant” may be submitted as one of the contract references. If multiple orders under a single GSA contract or BPA are submitted in response to this Factor, each will be considered an individual contract reference for purposes of the 5 contract reference submission limitation. If you do not have relevant Federal Government contracts, then provide data on state and local government or commercial contracts, in that order, to complete this report. NOTE: For each contract cited on Attachment 1B, line 6 requires the contract type and total price, and line 7 requires the final amount invoiced or amount invoiced to date. CAUTION: Although a contract may meet the relevancy requirement of $20 million (or $3 million for significant subcontractor(s)) stated above for line 6, if the amount stated in line 7 is significantly lower than that amount, little or no credit may be given for that contract. Offerors shall provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror’s corrective action. As applicable, the offeror shall provide data demonstrating the offeror’s success in meeting its Subcontracting Plan Goals, including history of commitment to, and timely payment to, small businesses, HUBZone small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, women-owned small businesses and small disadvantaged business

7. Evaluation Criteria • Other Factors Proposal • Factor A, Corporate Experience is more important than Factor B, Past Performance and Factor C, Sample Task, both of which are of equal importance. • Factor B, Past Performance and Factor C, Sample Task are each significantly more important than Factor E Small Business Participation. • Factor D, ISO 9001 Registration will be evaluated on a Pass/Fail basis.

8. Evaluation Criteria • FACTOR A: CORPORATE EXPERIENCE • The Government will evaluate each offeror’s (prime and significant subcontractors) relevant experience. The evaluation will be a subjective assessment of the offeror’s experience with work of similar nature, scope, complexity, and difficulty to that which must be performed under the prospective contract contemplated by this solicitation. The objective of the evaluation is to: • determine the degree to which the offeror has previously encountered the kinds of work, uncertainties, challenges, and risks that it is likely to encounter under the prospective contract; and • develop insight into the offeror’s relative capability and the relative risk associated with contracting with the offeror. • Subfactors that will be evaluated are: • Sufactor A1: Offeror demonstrates experience in production management support in accordance with SOW Section 5.1 • Sufactor A2: Offeror demonstrates experience in production engineering support in accordance with SOW Section 5.2 • Sufactor A3: Offeror demonstrates experience in production execution in accordance with SOW Section 5.3. • The subfactors’ order of relative importance is established as follows: • Subfactor A3 is significantly more important than subfactors A1 and A2. • Subfactors A1 and A2 are of equal importance. • Offerors shall be evaluated against all of the Statement of Work paragraphs listed on Attachment 1B, Reference Information Sheet-Contract Specific Data, item # 13.

9. Significant Sub Selection • Preliminary Cost Data Call • Will be out by COB 10 December • Due by COB 14 December • Largely SCA labor cats - we will provide: • wage determinations Norfolk VA and Charleston • Labor category work sheet • Labor category descriptions • Load through G&A • Preliminary Corporate Experience Data Call • Will be out by COB 10 December • Due by COB 14 December • We will provide an experience matrix based on SOW • Identify contracts and relevant experience with “X” • Make sure associated Past Performance will be rated above average

10. Pricing Issues

11. Other Factors Issues The FSC Team Brings Unparallel SPAWAR Experience and Documented Performance to the RCP&I

12. Schedule The FSC Team Brings Unparallel SPAWAR Experience and Documented Performance to the RCP&I