1 / 6

Revisit the EDM sensitivity

Revisit the EDM sensitivity. E. Beise, U Maryland. Oct 2007 collaboration meeting Boston, MA. starting points: Golub & Lamoureaux, Phys. Rep. 237 (1994) 1 Section V.H of 2002 pre-proposal Internal report LAUR 02-5924, Van Cleve & Cooper Chibane, etal, Meas. Sci. Tech. 6 (1995) 1671

ruana
Télécharger la présentation

Revisit the EDM sensitivity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Revisit the EDM sensitivity E. Beise, U Maryland Oct 2007 collaboration meeting Boston, MA starting points: Golub & Lamoureaux, Phys. Rep. 237 (1994) 1 Section V.H of 2002 pre-proposal Internal report LAUR 02-5924, Van Cleve & Cooper Chibane, etal, Meas. Sci. Tech. 6 (1995) 1671 Work by V. Ciancolo, Feb 2006 Collab. mtg (Caltech) E. Beise, U Maryland

  2. What have I actually done so far? read a bunch…. talked to people…. E. Beise, U Maryland

  3. Basic considerations Precession frequency shift w/ reversal of electric field:  Statistical uncertainty (no background & uncertainty principle limit): Basic driving equation is: E. Beise, U Maryland

  4. Starting from work of V. Ciancolo • “event” (measurement cycle) generator w/ nominal input parameters • analyzer uses Poisson-distributed data, max log-likelihood • 2-step process: • first determine (smooth) background • 2-parameter fit (Dfedm, f) (only background is from n lifetime in cell, Rb = 2) E. Beise, U Maryland

  5. Vince’s results Frequency shift is masked by hiding sign of E Distribution consistent w/ expected uncertainty with good c2 Input dn reproduced E. Beise, U Maryland

  6. What to do next • Revisit all input parameters • study (spatial and/or temporal) variations in B and E (notes from Vince) • * Additional background scenarios: • Contributions from neutron activation (these are very small in the UCN lifetime experiment)? • notes from Tito (estimated from UCN lifetime) • input neutron distribution from UKy simulations, simulate where the neutrons and g’s go inside vessel • need more information about materials • 3He depolarization, “spin dynamics”? • all suggestions/guidance welcome at present E. Beise, U Maryland

More Related