1 / 8

Detection and occurrence of low-level jets over Testbed area

Detection and occurrence of low-level jets over Testbed area. T. Roschier A-J Punkka. motivation and goals. Use and evaluation of wind profiler data in low-level jet detection Comparison between sounding and profiler data Low-level jet occurrence (11/2005-10/2006).

russ
Télécharger la présentation

Detection and occurrence of low-level jets over Testbed area

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Detection and occurrence of low-level jets over Testbed area T. Roschier A-J Punkka

  2. motivation and goals • Use and evaluation of wind profiler data in low-level jet detection • Comparison between sounding and profiler data • Low-level jet occurrence (11/2005-10/2006)

  3. definition of low-level jet • Glossary of meteorology: ”A jet stream that is typically found in the lower 2-3 km of the troposphere.” • Climatology of the low level jet (Bonner 1968): ”Criterion 1: The wind at the level of maximum wind must equal or exceed 12 m/s and must decrease at least 6 m/s to the next higher minimum or to the 3 km level.” • LLJ climatology…in the Southern Great Plains (Whiteman et al. 1997): ”Criterion 1: Maximum wind speed greater than 10 m/s in the lowest 3 km and the wind speed must decrease by at least 5 m/s before the 3 km level is reached.” • Definition of Whiteman et al. used in this study.

  4. methods • Primary data source Vantaa soundings (via Researcher’s interface) • Comparisons to Jokioinen and Tallinn soundings (UWyo) and to Malmi wind profiler (RI) • Stages • collecting of cases • statistics of found cases: monthly distribution, wind speed at LLJ core, LLJ core height etc. • comparisons

  5. data problems • irregular soundings from Vantaa • coarse temporal resolution of Jokioinen and Tallinn soundings • bad raw data from Malmi wind profiler • discontinuities in measurements • poor signal quality

  6. Good data from soundings • Profiler data missing ;)

  7. Good wind profiler case ?

  8. what to learn • usability of wind profiler data in LLJ detection • to get very preliminary overview the frequency of occurrence of LLJs

More Related