1 / 20

Competitive media for protein complex analysis using OptiPrep ™

Competitive media for protein complex analysis using OptiPrep ™. Sucrose and glycerol. ANALYSIS OF PROTEIN COMPLEX FORMATION AND PROTEIN OLIGOMERIZATION. Non-covalent bonds between protein molecules influenced by tightly-bound water molecules around amino acid side chains

sanaa
Télécharger la présentation

Competitive media for protein complex analysis using OptiPrep ™

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Competitive media for protein complex analysis using OptiPrep™ • Sucrose and glycerol

  2. ANALYSIS OF PROTEIN COMPLEX FORMATION AND PROTEIN OLIGOMERIZATION • Non-covalent bonds between protein molecules influenced by tightly-bound water molecules around amino acid side chains • Low water activity (high osmolality) of sucrose and glycerol gradients leads to loss of these tightly-bound water molecules

  3. Incubation time at 35° Fraction number 0 min 30 min 18 h 18 days Oligomerization of -Amyloid PeptideWard, R.V., et al (2000) Biochem. J., 348, 137-144

  4. Plasma lipoprotein analysis using OptiPrep™ • Competitive media • Potassium bromide + sodium chloride

  5. Density (in potassium bromide) and size of human plasma lipoproteins

  6. Blood Plasma 2000g 100,000g 20 min 30 min 1.0 ml saline (1.006 g/ml) Chylomicrons (<0.95 g/ml) removed Fractionation of human plasma lipoproteins by sequential flotation (I)

  7. saline KBr VLDL 100,000g 1.006 g/ml 20 h >>1.03 g/ml Chylomicron-free plasma (1.03 g/ml) LDL HDL 1.063 g/ml 1.21 g/ml KBr Fractionation of human plasma lipoproteins by sequential flotation (II)

  8. Continuous Discontinuous VLDL 1.006 g/ml 200,000g LDL 1.063 g/ml 24 h 1.15 g/ml HDL Plasma (1.21 g/ml) Fractionation of human plasma lipoproteins in a NaCl/KBr gradient

  9. Blood Plasma Chylomicrons 2000g 100,000g 20 min 30 min Saline VLDL LDL 350,000g HDL + 1/5th 2.5-3.0h vol. of OptiPrep Lipoprotein fractionation strategy I

  10. Gilson Fraction Collector P 96-well plate Harvest gradient into equal volume fractions

  11. MB Labconco Auto Densi-flow linked to a Gilson FC205 Fraction Collector

  12. Density (g/ml) 0 h 1 h 2 h 3 h 1.2 1.1 1.0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Fraction Number TLN 100; 350,000g

  13. Typical fractionation in 12% iodixanol in the TLN100 1.6 8 6 1.2 TAG (mM) Cholesterol (mM) 0.8 4 0.4 2 0 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 bottom Fraction number top From: Higgins JA, Graham, JM & Davies I (2001) In Atherosclerosis, Experimental Methods and Protocols (ed Drew AF) Humana Press, Totowa, NJ pp 37-49.

  14. Comparison of lipoprotein banding in 12% iodixanol gradient (TLN100): plasma from two subjects Fraction number From: Higgins JA, Graham, JM & Davies I (2001) In Atherosclerosis, Experimental Methods and Protocols (ed Drew AF) Humana Press, Totowa, NJ pp 37-49.

  15. Blood Plasma Chylomicrons 2000g 100,000g 20 min 30 min VLDL Saline LDL 350,000g 6% or 9% iodixanol HDL 2.5-3.0h + 1/5th vol. of OptiPrep Lipoprotein fractionation strategy II

  16. Cholesterol profiles of three subjects in 9/12% iodixanol self-generated gradients in TLN100 rotor 1.30 0.20 1.20 Density (g/ml) umoles/fraction 0.10 1.10 0 1.00 44 Fractions From Sawle, A, Higgins, MK, Olivant, MP,and Higgins, JA (2002) J. Lipid Res. 43, 335-343.

  17. Fractionation and analysis of Coomassie blue stained lps in NVT65 1D Gel Scanner 8 ml 9% 340,000g/3h 12% 3 ml From Davies, IG and Griffin BA (2001) British Hyperlipidaemia Association Edinburgh, July 2001; Atherosclerosis (2001) 159, 247-252.

  18. Analysis of Coomassie-blue stained LDL band 1 3 2 Density Reference scale 0.42 0.33 0.28 0.53 2 3 1 From Davies, IG and Griffin BA (2001) British Hyperlipidaemia Association Edinburgh, July 2001; Atherosclerosis (2001) 159, 247-252.

  19. Advantages of the new technology • Lipoproteins close to their native state • Self-generated gradients simple and reproducible • Close to 100% recovery of lipids • Identification and quantitation of the principal LDL subclasses • Potential for adaptation of techniques to HDL and VLDL subfractionation

  20. Publications database for macromolecules and macromolecular complexes • OptiPrep (since 1994) over 100 • Nycodenz® (since 1984) approx 100 • Using either the OptiPrep Applications CD or the website: • www.axis-shield-density-gradient-media.com • Follow the instructions to access the relevant Index • Click on the macromolecule or macromolecular complex of interest

More Related