1 / 37

Exploiting Structural and Comparative Genomics to Reveal Protein Functions

Exploiting Structural and Comparative Genomics to Reveal Protein Functions. How many domain families can we find in the genomes and can we predict the functions of relatives? Exploiting protein structure to predict protein functions

schwarzd
Télécharger la présentation

Exploiting Structural and Comparative Genomics to Reveal Protein Functions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Exploiting Structural and Comparative Genomics to Reveal Protein Functions • How many domain families can we find in the genomes and can we predict the functions of relatives? • Exploiting protein structure to predict protein functions • Using correlated phylogenetic profiles based on CATH domains to reveal functional associations T H A C Domain families of known structure Gene3D Protein families and domain annotations for completed genomes

  2. CATHEDRAL Oliver Redfern and Andrew Harrison Combines a rapid graph theory secondary structure filter with dynamic programming for accurate residue alignment SVM is used to combine scores and assess significance of match CATH version 3.0 1100 fold groups 2100 homologous superfamilies 86,000 Domains

  3. DDP Fold Recognition Performance % Correct Fold SSAP Rank

  4. Gene3D:Domain annotations in genome sequences scan against library of HMM models ~2000 CATH ~9000 Pfam >2 million protein sequences from 300 completed genomes and Uniprot assign domains to CATH and Pfam superfamilies Benchmarking by structural data shows that 76% of remote homologues can be identified using the HMMs

  5. DomainFinder: structural domains from CATH take precedent NewFam Pfam-1 CATH-1 Pfam-2 Gene3D: Domain annotations in genome sequences N C CATH-1 Pfam-2 Pfam-1 NewFam

  6. Domain families ranked by size (number of domain sequences) NewFam of unknown stucture Pfam families of unknown structure Percentage of all domain family sequences CATH superfamilies of known structure Rank by family size ~90% of domain sequences in the genomes and UniProt can be assigned to ~7000 domain families

  7. <100 families account for 50% of domain sequences of known fold structural superfamily (CATH) F2 subfamily of relatives F3 F1 relatives likely to have similar functions F4 F5 Only ~3% of diverse sequences in large CATH domain families have known structures

  8. Gene3D: Domain mappings for 300 Completed Genomes • 300 genomes, >2 million sequences including UniProt and RefSeq • structural domain assignments from CATH • functional domain assignments from Pfam • Also: SWISS-PROT, EC, COGs, GO, KEGG, MIPS, BIND, IntAct Iterative Profile SearchMethodology http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk:8080/Gene3D Russell Marsden, Corin Yeats, Michael Maibaum, David Lee Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Yeats et al. Nucleic Acids res. 2006.

  9. NewFam NewFam Pfam-1 Pfam-1 CATH-1 CATH-1 Pfam-2 Pfam-2 Conservation of enzyme function in homologous domains with same multidomain architecture (MDA) in Gene3D Protein 1 Protein 2 Conservation of EC number to 3 levels (%) Sequence identity

  10. Sequence identity thresholds for 95% conservation of enzyme function (to 3 EC Levels) 332 highly conserved families 60 highly variable families number of families number of sequences Sequence identity thresholds number of sequences number of families

  11. Exploiting Structural and Comparative Genomics to Reveal Protein Functions • How many domain families can we find in the genomes and can we predict the functions of relatives? • Exploiting protein structure to predict protein functions • Using correlated phylogenetic profiles based on CATH domains to reveal functional associations T H A C Domain families of known structure Gene3D Protein families and domain annotations for completed genomes

  12. Conservation of Enzyme Function in CATH Domain Families Structural similarity (SSAP) score Pairwise sequence identity different functions same functions

  13. Correlation of structural variability with number of different functional groups Number of COG functional groups Number of diverse structural clusters within family

  14. Some families show great structural diversity Gabrielle Reeves Multiple structural alignment by CORA allows identification of consensus secondary structure and embellishments 2DSEC algorithm In 117 superfamilies relatives expanded by >2 fold or more These families represent more than half the genome sequences of known fold

  15. Structural embellishments can modify the active site Galectin binding superfamily

  16. Structural embellishments can modulate domain interactions side orientation face orientation Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase a Dihydrodipiccolinate reductase Additional secondary structure shown at (a) are involved in subunit interactions

  17. Structural embellishments can modify function by modifying active site geometry and mediating new domain and subunit interactions Biotin carboxylase D-alanine-d-alanine ligase ATP Grasp superfamily Dimer of biotin carboxylase

  18. 80 60 Frequency (%) 40 Indel frequency < 1 % 20 0.85% 0.38% 0.23% 0.11% 0.06% 0.02% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Size of Indel (number of secondary structures) Secondary structure insertions are distributed along the chain but aggregate in 3D 85% of residue insertions comprise only 1 or 2 secondary structures 60% of domains have secondary structure embellishments co-located in 3D with 3 or more other embellishments In 80% of domains, 1 or more embellishments contact other domains or subunits

  19. ~80% of variable families are adopt regular layered architectures 2 Layer Alpha Beta Sandwich 2 Layer Beta Sandwich 3 Layer Alpha Beta Sandwich Alpha / Beta Barrel

  20. 2 Layer Alpha Beta Sandwich 2 Layer Beta Sandwich 3 Layer Alpha Beta Sandwich Alpha / Beta Barrel

  21. Function prediction to Guide Target Selection for Structural Genomics structural superfamily (CATH) close relatives with same MDA F2 F3 F1 relatives likely to have similar functions F4 F5 Only ~3% of diverse sequence families (S30 clusters) in large CATH families have known structures

  22. Conservation of Enzyme Function in Homologous Domains Conservation of EC levels (%) Structure similarity (SSAP) score

  23. FLORA – structural templates for assigning structures to functional subgroups in CATH Perform CORA multiple structural alignment on functional subfamiles within CATH superfamily Use CORAXplode (HMMs) to find related sequences in UniProt and identify conserved residues (seed) Explore local structural environment of seed residues to find conserved structural motifs Dataset of 84 enzyme superfamilies in CATH of which 21 are functionally very diverse

  24. Finding conserved residue positions (seeds) - Scorecons multiple sequence alignment of relatives from functional family guided by structure alignment identify most highly conserved residue positions using Scorecons – Valdar and Thornton (2001) seed positions

  25. FLORA Algorithm for Identifying Structural Homologues with Similar Functions expand to local environment of 12Å assign conserved sequence seeds identify structurally conserved residue cliques and generate template new structures are scanned against a library of FLORA templates and SVMs used to assess significance of matches

  26. Performance of FLORA vs Global Structure Comparison (SSAP) Coverage Error rate

  27. Exploiting Structural and Comparative Genomics to Reveal Protein Functions • How many domain families can we find in the genomes and can we predict the functions of relatives? • Exploiting protein structure to predict protein functions • Using correlated phylogenetic profiles based on CATH domains to reveal functional associations T H A C Domain families of known structure Gene3D Protein families and domain annotations for completed genomes

  28. CATH Domain Superfamily Organism sp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 12 13 14 11 Superfamily 1 35 0 12 60 Superfamily 2 6 0 0 0 Superfamily 3 Eisenberg Phylogenetic Profiles for Detecting Functional Associations Superfamily Organism sp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 presence or absence of superfamily in organism Functionally Linked 1 0 1 0 Superfamily 1 1 0 1 0 Superfamily 2 0 0 1 1 Superfamily 3 Gene3D Phylogenetic Occurrence Profiles number of relatives from superfamily in organism

  29. Phylogenetic Occurrence Profiles Based on Domain Superfamily and Subfamilies in Gene3D 50% sequence identity cluster Superfamily 40% sequence identity cluster 30% sequence identity cluster

  30. Sp1 Sp2 Sp3 Sp4 … Spn 3 3 5 7 … 5 0 2 4 5 … 4 1 0 1 0 … 1 0 2 0 0 … 6 1 0 2 1 … 0 0 3 1 2 … 1 0 0 0 1 … 2 . . . . … . . . . . … . . . . . … . 0 1 0 1 … 0 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Cluster 5 Cluster 6 Cluster 7 . . . Cluster n Phylogenetic Profiles for Families and Subfamilies Juan Ranea and Corin Yeats domains clustered at different levels of sequence similarity: phylogenetic occurrence profile matrix Superfam. 30% 40% 50% 60%… 100%

  31. 10 5 Sp1 Sp2 Sp3 Sp4 Sp5 … Spn Sp1 Sp2 Sp3 Sp4 Sp5 … Spn 10 6 9 6 9 5 … 9 4 3 7 5 3 … 5 1 0 1 0 2 … 1 0 2 0 0 1 … 6 1 4 1 4 1 … 4 0 3 1 2 0 … 1 4 8 4 8 4 … 8 . . . . . … . . . . . . … . . . . . . … . 0 1 0 1 1 … 0 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4 Cluster 5 Cluster 6 Cluster 7 . . . Cluster n 5 Sp1 Sp2 Sp3 Sp4 Sp5 … Spn 10 5 Sp1 Sp2 Sp3 Sp4 Sp5 … Spn Comparison of Pairs of Phylogenetic Profiles Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 1 E1 Cluster 5 E2 Euclidian distance: Cluster 1 E1 >>E2 Cluster 7

  32. Statistical Significance of Correlated Pairs (Comparison against 3 randomised models) Real matrix Random matrix I Frequency Random matrix II Random matrix III Pearson correlation coefficients

  33. Domain Associations Network from 13 Eukaryotes: Actin & VCP-like ATPases DNA replication and repair Chaperones and Cytoskeleton DNA Topoisomerase & Elongation factor G

  34. DNA topoisomerase & Elongation Factor G Number of domain relatives Species

  35. Highly correlated profiles correspond to pairs of families with significant similarity in GO functions biological processes Distances of correlated profile scores Frequency of significant GO semantic similarity scores

  36. Summary • On average 85% of domain sequences in genomes can be assigned to ~6000 domain families in CATH and Pfam • Information on multidomain architectures (MDAs) can extend functional annotations obtained through domain based homologies • Specific structural templates for functional subgroups within domain families can also help in assigning functions as more structures are solved • Analysis of Gene3D phylogenetic occurrence profiles allows detection of functional associations between families

  37. Acknowledgements Gene3D CATH Lesley Greene Alison Cuff Ian Sillitoe Tony Lewis Mark Dibley Oliver Redfern Tim Dallman Corin Yeats Sarah Addou Russell Marsden David Lee Alastair Grant Ilhem Diboun Juan Garcia Ranea http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/bsm/cath_new Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, NIH EU funded Biosapiens, EU funded Embrace, BBSRC

More Related