180 likes | 331 Vues
CSDGM: Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata. February 7, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors. Outlines. NSDI Metadata CSDGM: Overview CSDGM: Structure & syntax CSDGM: Details Creating CSDGM-compliant metadata. NSDI. NSDI
E N D
CSDGM:Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata February 7, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors
Outlines • NSDI • Metadata • CSDGM: Overview • CSDGM: Structure & syntax • CSDGM: Details • Creating CSDGM-compliant metadata
NSDI • NSDI • Human resources, technology, standard, and policy for geospatial activity • Vision of NSDI • Effective utilization of geospatial data for better understanding of environments critical to our future; data should be accessible, integrated, and managed in an effective manner • Core components of NSDI • Partnership, data, framework, metadata, clearinghouse, standard
2. Role of metadata • Availability • Access • Fitness of use • Data transfer Q. Which sections should you look up in the metadata for each task?
Value of metadata • It’s like a food label • what’s in it? • It’s like an insurance • e.g. accuracy of data for disaster management • Enhance data value • It’s investment in future • Eliminate duplication efforts • Effective data integration for effective problem-solving
CSDGM • This is FGDC (U.S.) content standard for digital geospatial metadata • First version: 1994 • Second version: 1998 • Data created with public funding should make metadata available in a way that they are compliant with CSDGM • How do you know if it’s CSDGM-compliant or not? • Transition to ISO (International) standard
CSDGM • It’s complex and detailed because it handles extensive spatial data set • e.g. vector file, remote sensing image, table • Same reason that SDTS is complex • It’s structured because it should be read by computer (national geospatial clearinghouse) for electronic search; i.e. it should be parsable • It uses common terms (do you understand the meaning of terms used in CSDGM?) • It is hierarchically organized (does structure in metadata make sense to you?)
CSDGM: structure • It uses common terms • Name of different elements are uniform • It is hierarchically organized • Sections > compound elements > data elements • Sections are divided into primary sections and supporting sections • Primary sections: common contents of CSDGM (e.g. identification to metadata_reference) reflecting intrinsic elements of geospatial data (e.g. georeferencing, spatial data structure) • Supporting sections: referred in multiple times by primary sections (e.g. contact, time period); thus cannot be used alone
CSDGM: syntax • Understanding production rules • It specifies composition rules • + is AND, | is OR • It specifies whether it’s mandatory or not • … means MANDATORY • 0{…}1 means MANDATORY IF APPLICABLE • What does it mean by “mandatory if applicable”? • (…) means OPTIONAL • It specifies repeatability of elements • 0{…}N means that this element can be repeated none to many
Production rules: examples Metadata = Identification_Information + 0{Data_Quality_Information}1 + 0{Spatial_Data_Organization_Information}1 + 0{Spatial_Reference_Information}1 + 0{Entity_and_Attribute_Information}1 + 0{Distribution_Information}n + Metadata_Reference_Information
Production rules: examples Spatial_Data_Organization_Information = 0{Indirect_Spatial_Reference}1 + 0{Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method + ( [Point_and_Vector_Object_Information | Raster_Object_Information] )}1 Do the same for Spatial_Reference Do the same for Entity_and_Attribute
CSDGM: details • Draw tree-like diagrams for each section, and make sense out of them, also relate them to your previous knowledge • Main components of geographic information • Identification > keywords • Spatial data structure • Spatial_Data_Organization • Projection, geodetic datum • Spatial_Reference > Planar > … • Level of measurement • Entity_and_Attribute > … > domain values
CSDGM: details • Let’s go over some unfamiliar terms • Identification > Spatial Domain > • Bounding coordinates vs. Data set G-Polygon • Data Quality > Attribute/Positional Accuracy > • Accuracy report vs. Quantitative Assessment • Lineage: use of abbreviation in source and process step • Spatial Reference > • Local planar system • Local system • Resolution for raster vs. vector • Scale factor, false easting/northing
CSDGM: details • Entity and Attribute > • Detailed description vs. overview description • Entity is table, attribute is column in the table • Domain values of attribute: {enumerated, range, codeset, unrepresentable} • Distribution • Resource description
Metadata types • You can create different kinds of metadata • Formal vs. informal • Formal metadata: CSDGM compliant • E.g. USGS data catalog • http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/ • Informal metadata: doesn’t conform • E.g. King County GIS Center: geoguide • Access from WAGDA • Minimal vs. quality • You can create minimal metadata • Required: http://www.lic.wisc.edu/metadata/acmemin.htm • Denver core: http://www.lic.wisc.edu/metadata/denvcore.htm • You can create quality metadata such that users can determine the fitness of use
Metadata formats • CSDGM does not specify format, but rather content as indicated by name • That’s why metadata looks different (see note section for link to different metadata) • Can be in the format of html, text, xml
Creating metadata • So how do I create metadata? • hard copy approach • You know the title/subtitle, and what to fill in • digital copy approach • Use metadata creation tool • Demo: tkme from USGS • How do I know this metadata conforms to FGDG Content Standard? • By understanding production rules, do this manually? • Use software (e.g. mp from USGS) EVENT1 will walk you through this….
For P2 (Lineage report) • If metadata is in a good condition, use them • Otherwise, talk to persons referred in metadata • Look up sample metadata from USGS data catalog, and emulate them • http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/ • Write in two pages or so even though it will vary highly depending on data