1 / 47

The Game of Science and the Science of a Game The Development of an HIV Prevention Video Game

The Game of Science and the Science of a Game The Development of an HIV Prevention Video Game. Lynn E. Fiellin, M.D. Supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant: R01HD062080. The Problem.

shel
Télécharger la présentation

The Game of Science and the Science of a Game The Development of an HIV Prevention Video Game

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Game of Scienceandthe Science of a GameThe Development of an HIV Prevention Video Game Lynn E. Fiellin, M.D. Supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Developmentgrant: R01HD062080

  2. The Problem No change in HIV incidence = 48,100 new cases in 2009 Those most affected: Younger age groups = 39% between ages 13-29 years Ethnic minorities = 115 cases/100,000 blacks/Hispanics vs. 15 cases/100,000 whites Sexual risk = 85% due to sex

  3. An Opportunity Early teen years are a window of opportunity to intervene on sexual risk: 48% of high school students reported sex ONLY 7% before age 13(Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2007)

  4. An Interactive Video Game For HIV Prevention in At-Risk Adolescents

  5. Why a Video Game? 15 million play interactive video games 63% of 11-14 year-olds play on a given day Extends across racial and economic lines 60% of Blacks, 55% of Hispanics, 61% of Whites 58% with household incomes < $35,000 Video game play has been found to affect change in health behaviors Asthma Diabetes Eating habits/obesity Physical activity Smoking prevention

  6. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  7. The Team • Collaborators: • Scientists: • HIV risk behaviors (sex and drug-related) • Lynn Sullivan, M.D. • David Fiellin, M.D. • Jen Edelman, M.D. • Child development • Linda Mayes, M.D. • Marjorie Rosenthal, M.D. • Deepa Camenga, M.D. • Brian Forsyth, M.D. • Gail Slap, M.D. • Health behavior change • Kimberly Hieftje, Ph.D. • M. Zachary Rosenthal, Ph.D. • Carl Lejuez, Ph.D. • Lindsay Duncan, Ph.D. • Prospect theory/message framing • Peter Salovey, Ph.D. • Game Developers: • Ben Sawyer—Digitalmill • Noah Falstein—The Inspiracy • Robin Hunicke--Thatgamecompany • Alex Seropian—Disney Interactive Studios • Schell Games • Community Programs: • Elizabeth Gambardella—Farnam Neighborhood House

  8. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  9. Theoretical Constructs • Proven factors in behavior change/risk reduction: • Social learning theory/self-efficacy • Social competency • Prospect theory • Delay discounting • Message framing

  10. My Future is My Life Components and Minigames IntraPersonal (Individual) Social Context/ Situations Socio-Cultural Environment Aspirational Avatar Genetics Biology Personality Family School Neighborhood Peers Mass Media Regulations Religion Economy Priority Sense Social Bonding/ Attachment Others’ Behavior & Approval General Values Information Environment Sense of Self Social Competence Know Power People Sense Trouble Sense Self- Determination Social Skills Others’ Expectations Desire to Please Evaluation of Outcomes Expected Consequences Future Sense Refuse Power Social Normative Beliefs Attitudes Toward the Behavior Self-Efficacy Epilogue Collages INTENTIONS/DECISIONS BEHAVIOR Experiences from Behavior 13

  11. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  12. Creating a Design Document: The “Game” • “Aspirational Avatar” • Goals and values • Mini-games tied together • Pre-visualization • Sexual health education • HIV education • Refusal, persuasion (negotiation) skills • Handling negative situations • “Reading” individuals, reading groups • Delay discounting • Risk literacy • Prospect theory/ message framing

  13. Aspirational Avatar • Move beyond physical representation of players in a virtual environment • Expand to include aspirations, goals, dreams • Future orientation & decisions

  14. Initial Visualization

  15. The Game • A 2D "RPG" (role-playing game)-style game: • How the choices one makes in life impact both short-term and long-term life goals • Target audience = inner-city youth ages 11 to 14 years • The goal = to improve youth’s understanding of risk and risky behaviors associated with the acquisition of HIV  • Player’s engagement in game play will provide opportunities to practice skills: • Navigating situations and negotiating decision-making to avoid risk

  16. How to Play the Game • The player plays as their Aspirational Avatar • Multiple “trips” through their life with different “choices” • Iteratively experiencing impact of choices on their life plan • 8-12 45 minute sessions • Data captured through game play and by standardized instruments during trial and at 12 and 24 months

  17. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  18. Content Development • Working with community program with at-risk youth: • Interviews and focus groups: • Purposeful sample of African-American and Latino young adolescents • Participating in an after-school or summer enrichment program • 21 boys and 20 girls, ages 10-15 years

  19. Established in 1943 • Fair Haven section of New Haven • Serves inner-city at-risk population • Provides after-school and weekend programs • Over 900 youth ages 6 -18 years

  20. In-depth Individual Interviews • Audiotaped • 15 final interviews • Domains: • Extracurricular activities • Video game play • Life plan • Risk-taking • Decision-making • Peer influences • Future orientation • Demographics

  21. In-depth Individual Interviews • Interviews professionally transcribed • Text reviewed by 3 reviewers for themes in an iterative fashion • Results informed focus groups • Coded transcripts to be entered into Atlas Ti: • Qualitative data analysis software • Output is a comprehensive identification of key themes

  22. Focus Groups • Onsite at Farnam Neighborhood House • Used themes elicited from interviews • 6 focus groups: 3 boys-only, 3 girls-only • Audiotaped • Professionally transcribed • 5 reviewers coded transcripts • A grounded theory approach

  23. Focus Group Themes • Video Game Play • Reality • Alternate reality/fantasy • Success • Self • Others • Environment • Party Scene • Risk-taking • Future orientation • Consequences • Message framing • Positive • Negative • Combined

  24. Results • Main themes from individual interviews: • Avatar • Often represents “ideal self” • Protective • Ownership in decisions, choices • Game play • Kids know what they like • Not educational; not too hard, not too easy • Be able to control character’s choices and actions • Develop mastery (self-efficacy) • Able to translate to both real life and alternate life

  25. Results • Main themes from focus groups: • 1) Boys and girls both described pregnancy and its associated impact as the major consequence of sexual risk-taking behavior with very limited discussion of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV • 2) Risk-taking behaviors described by both boys and girls included sexual violence, gun violence and bullying • 3) Factors associated with avoiding high-risk behaviors included internal strength, a connection with a mentor figure, and a supportive, safe environment • 4) Both boys and girls preferred sexual risk reduction and HIV prevention messages that included positive and negative message framing.

  26. Content Development <- -> Game Development

  27. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  28. Hiring a Studio • Request for Information (RFI) from 10 studios • Narrowed to 5 studios to send Request for Proposal (RFP) • Created a 30-page design document to send to studios with RFP • 3 studios responded • 2 proposals—reviewed by commercial game consultants • Awarded project to Schell Games of Pittsburgh

  29. Schell Games Founder Jesse Schell: Assistant Professor at Carnegie Mellon’s Entertainment Technology Center

  30. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  31. Contracts and Negotiations • Interface with the Office of Cooperative Research (OCR) • Secured a patent on concept of the “Aspirational Avatar” • Work with Grants & Contracts to draft additional language addressing intellectual property • Met with Yale’s Office of General Counsel • Met with Schell Games

  32. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  33. People

  34. Places

  35. Stories

  36. Project Phases Forming a team/forging collaborations • Content Development: • Individual interviews • Focus groups • Game Development: • Identification and integration of established theoretical constructs • Creating a design document/How to play the game • Hiring a video game studio • Contracts/Negotiations Pre-Production Randomized Clinical Trial

  37. Study Design Randomized Clinical Trial: HIV Prevention Video Game vs. commercial video game 2 sessions/week of assigned game for 4 weeks 2 booster sessions at 6 months Educational materials Subjects 330 minority adolescents Ages 11-14 years Attend after-school or other youth program Outcomes: Primary: delay initiation of sexual activity Secondary: HIV risk behavior knowledge Prevention of drug/alcohol use Improved self-efficacy and social competency

  38. Conclusions HIV incidence is unacceptably high, especially among young minorities Young teens offer a window of opportunity to intervene on sexual risk Video game play offers a unique vehicle as an intervention

  39. Conclusions • The development process involves: • Multi-faceted approach with multi-disciplinary teams • Incorporating qualitative data into development of an intervention • Parallel and intersecting efforts in game development and content development • Success requires coordination between science, community, technology, and law • Development of a video game for HIV prevention: • If effective, will serve as a model for other technology-based interventions targeting prevention and health promotion • Can translate to mobile technologies such as smart phones for broader dissemination (including international)

  40. Acknowledgements • Game Side: • Ben Sawyer • Noah Falstein • Alex Seropian Science Side: • Kimberly Hieftje, PhD • E. Jennifer Edelman, MD • Deepa Camenga, MD • Marjorie Rosenthal, MD • Linda Mayes, MD • David Fiellin, MD • Peter Salovey, PhD • Brian Forsyth, MD • Lindsay Duncan, PhD • Gail Slap, MD • Maria Mezes • Legal/Contracts Side: • Kimberly Muller • Lauren Pite The Community Side: Elizabeth Gambardella

  41. Thank You!

More Related