1 / 12

60% DESIGN PRESENTATION

60% DESIGN PRESENTATION. EDMUND FINLEY TRISHA LOWE NICK MENCHEL ANNA SLEETER. 30% DESIGN. TO AVOID THIS…. LIVE LOADS. BEAM DESIGN LOAD CALCULATIONS. Live Loads (37.5% of the weight of a 17’ U-Haul) Dead Loads (due to slab)

simon-bowman
Télécharger la présentation

60% DESIGN PRESENTATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 60% DESIGN PRESENTATION EDMUND FINLEY TRISHA LOWE NICK MENCHEL ANNA SLEETER

  2. 30% DESIGN

  3. TO AVOID THIS…

  4. LIVE LOADS

  5. BEAM DESIGN LOAD CALCULATIONS • Live Loads (37.5% of the weight of a 17’ U-Haul) • Dead Loads (due to slab) • Using beam design program, d=0.2032 m (assuming 0.15 m deep slab) 23444.7 N 3 m 11722.35 N 11722.35 N 6828.02 N/m 10210.89 N 10210.89 N

  6. SLAB DESIGN LOAD CALCULATIONS • Widest Load Spacing, Narrowest Beam Spacing • Limiting case • Maximum Moment: 6534.7 N*m • Minimum Depth: 0.15 m • Designed as a beam 23,444.7 N 23,444.7 N 667.47 N 667.47 N 1.63 m • 667.47 N load is from curb • 23,444.7 N load is from 37.5% of the weight of a 17’ U-Haul Truck 0.68 m 0.1016 m 24,112.2 N 24,112.2 N 3.5 m

  7. SLAB DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS • Determined optimal beam spacing (1.90 m) • Used different track measurements • Cases Considered • Each of the four vehicles centered on the span • Each of the four vehicles as far to one edge as possible • Smallest and largest vehicles with one tire centered on the span (basically the same as vehicle at edge) • Checked against 0.15 m slab depth to ensure that the moment created would be safe • 0.15 m was estimate for slab depth used when designing beam, so recalculation was not necessary

  8. PIER DESIGN • Designed as a wall • 3.5 m x 0.3048 m x 2 m 2 m 0.3048 m 3.5 m

  9. AMOUNT OF CONCRETE AND FILL • Concrete • 2 beams spanning piers, slab spanning crossing, 5 piers • Total volume: 28 cubic meters • Fill • Around culverts • Total volume:

  10. UPDATED PROFILE VIEW

  11. PLAN VIEW

  12. WHAT COMES NEXT • Determine footing for piers • Adjust pier shape if necessary • Check moment calculations to ensure slabs and beams are thick enough • Design armoring • Design curb on slab • Design reinforcement for concrete

More Related