1 / 8

HOAP Joint Audit

HOAP Joint Audit. Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006. Importance of procurement. 3 Ministries NAO Donors Donor Working Groups PCB PPRA PCA GGCU. BACKGROUND. FRAMEWORK, INSTITUTIONS & CAPACITY. Donor action has resulted in an improved framework

sofia
Télécharger la présentation

HOAP Joint Audit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HOAP Joint Audit Review of Procurement Tanzania 9th June 2006

  2. Importance of procurement 3 Ministries NAO Donors Donor Working Groups PCB PPRA PCA GGCU BACKGROUND

  3. FRAMEWORK, INSTITUTIONS & CAPACITY • Donor action has resulted in an improved framework • Reforms represent clear improvement • Lack of capacity has prevented full potential from being realised

  4. COMPLIANCE (1 of 2) • Regulatory Authority and Appeals Authority created, but yet to exercise their statutory powers • Compliance with key provisions of new procurement legislation in ministries visited appears strong • Clear enthusiasm to comply with new legislation • Overall compliance picture is unclear • NAO recognition that procurement deserves particular attention • PAF indicator specifically examining compliance reflects the subject's importance

  5. COMPLIANCE (2 of 2) Recommendations: • Clarify boundaries between responsibilities of NAO and PPRA (and MoF) • Assess work performed by the external auditors

  6. VALUE FOR MONEY (1 of 2) • NAO has recently commenced detailed VFM work, although it is yet to perform any specific procurement-related VFM work • No donor-monitored indicator concerning VFM (PEFAR recommendation that a means of measuring and enhancing VFM performance should be developed)

  7. VALUE FOR MONEY (2 of 2) Recommendations • Indicator measure progress in VFM • Update the $300m figure • Perception indicators in corruption

  8. OVERALL PICTURE • "Tremendous Progress" yet lower grade awarded in PEFAR assessment • High level of cooperation among donors • Highly process-orientated Recommendations: • Improve consistency between and amongst tools used for measurement and capacity-building. • Accommodate economy, efficiency and effectiveness considerations

More Related