1 / 24

ROAD TO CLIMATE FRIENDLY CHILLERS Hydrocarbons & Absorption Chillers Systems:

ROAD TO CLIMATE FRIENDLY CHILLERS Hydrocarbons & Absorption Chillers Systems: Development & Potential Dr. Alaa Olama Sept. 2010 , Cairo, Egypt. CONTENTS: 1- Hydrocarbon fired Absorption Chiller & Heat ratio 2- Difference between HR (COP) Abs. & COP V.C.

Télécharger la présentation

ROAD TO CLIMATE FRIENDLY CHILLERS Hydrocarbons & Absorption Chillers Systems:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ROAD TO CLIMATE FRIENDLY CHILLERS Hydrocarbons & Absorption Chillers Systems: Development & Potential Dr. Alaa Olama Sept. 2010 , Cairo, Egypt

  2. CONTENTS: 1- Hydrocarbon fired Absorption Chiller & Heat ratio 2- Difference between HR (COP) Abs. & COP V.C. 3- How did H.R (COP) improve dramatically. 4- Conclusion

  3. 1- Hydrocarbon Fired Absorption Chiller & Heat Ratio

  4. Definition of COP (HR) of Absorption Chillers COP(LP)= (Refrigeration capacity/(Gas Low calorific value*Gas consumption) COP(HP)= (Refrigeration capacity/(Gas High calorific value *Gas consumption)

  5. 2- Difference between HR (COP) Abs. & (COP) V.C.

  6. Overall efficiency of a power station: * Efficiency at Refrigeration plant boundary becomes 25 to 50 %

  7. Comparing chillers efficiencies:

  8. 3- How did H.R (COP) improve dramatically

  9. History of absorption chiller-heater 1.1 1.07 0.75 0.93~0.96 1.3 0.80 1.2 1.35 1.6以上 2005.2Kyoto Protocol History of development for Gas direct fired absorption chiller

  10. H.R (COP) Improvement

  11. 5.High performanceheat transfer tube 2.RefrigerantCooler 6.Exhaust heat-exchanger 3.Dual absorptionDual evaporation 7.Larger Heat transferarea on ABS. EVP. RFD 8-Efficiency improvedon High stage GEN. 4.Condensed refrigerantheat-exchanger Key technology to improve the efficiency RCD 1.Improved solutionheat-exchanger RED

  12. Internal piping flow of RFD (chiller)

  13. Low temp. High temp Plate heat-exchanger Key technology of improvement 1- Improvement on efficiency of solution heat-exchanger • Solution heat-exchanger Shell & Tube typeheat-exchanger ☆Advantage ・ Better heat transfer performance compared to S&T ◎More compact ・ Less solution retained

  14. CONDS. 37℃ Refrigerant 38℃ Ref. cooler 36.5℃ EVP. (9℃) ABS. 32℃ Cooling W Key technology of improvement 2- Refrigerant cooler Cooling down the refrigerant back from condenser, to reduce the load on Generator, to get better efficiency ↓ 33℃

  15. Key technology of improvement Enable to reduce circulating flow Less heating calorie at Generator,thus better efficiency 3- Dual Absorption, Dual Evaporation Cycle Upper stage:Low pressure in ABS. / EVP.Lower stage:High pressure in ABS. / EVP. ☆AdvantageBigger concentration difference of solution, by separating ABS. & EVP. to 2 stages

  16. Key technology of improvement 4- Condensed refrigerant heat-exchanger 90℃ 44℃ Condenser(38℃) Low stage GEN. Heat from Low GEN.⇒Steam from High GEN. Condensedrefrigerant 78℃ 36℃ Heat recovery on High temp. Refrigerant back from low GEN. and weak solution, to get better efficiency Condensed refrigerantheat-Exchanger High temp. H-exchanger Low temp. H-exchanger S.P. Weak solution

  17. 5- High Performance heat transfer tube Key technology of improvement

  18. 6- Exhaust heat-exchanger(Air pre-heater) Air Pre-heater 75℃ High GEN. 155℃ Key technology of improvement Exhaust The gas consumption reduced by pre-heating the air supply to the Burner. 165℃ Air supply 20℃ Natural Gas

  19. Key technology of improvement 7- Larger Heat transfer area on ABS. EVP.

  20. Key technology of improvement 8- Efficiency improved on High stage GEN.

  21. Improved solution heat-exchanger COP1.22 Exhaustheat-exchanger RED Designed based on COP1.29 machine Refrigerant cooler Reached COP1.35 with Exhaust heat-exchanger Solution flow regulation Dual ABS. / EVA. Efficiency improved High GEN. increased KA value, on CND. ABS. Improved solutionheat-exchanger Large head of chilled water (Δ8℃) Exhaustheat-exchanger Condensed ref. heat-exchanger RFD +0.05 +0.02 +0.085 +0.035 +0.015 +0.04 +0.06 +0.015 +0.02 COP1.00 COP1.29 COP1.35 Key technology of improvement Improvement of COP by each technology +

  22. 4- Conclusions

  23. Conclusions:- 1- When comparing The overall thermal efficiencies ,it is important to compare the efficiency of mechanical vapour compression systems (electric chillers) to the efficiencies of vapour compression systems ( absorption chillers) , starting at the boundary of supply to the power station(natural gas ) and the boundary of supply of natural gas at the absorption chillers burner, otherwise the comparison cannot be fair. 2- When this is done ,the difference in efficiencies is then quite close , taking into consideration that few power stations in Egypt have high thermal efficiencies. 3- Therefore the use of natural gas in large central air conditioning projects is economically sound since the saving in investment cost for power plant is considerable. (1)

  24. Conclusions(Cont.):- 4- Shaving electrical peak loads in summer can only be achieved by the use of natural gas fired air conditioning system. 5- legislation exists in many countries that prohibit the use of electrical energy in air conditioning over a certain refrigeration tonnages (over about 1000 TR) This is the case in Japan , South Korea & lately the United Arab Emirates. The aim of the legislation is to preserve electric power for applications where there are not other alternative sources of energy . (2)

More Related