1 / 10

Median Based Line Tracker

This document outlines the significance of removing non-fundamental noise sources, particularly lines, in gravitational wave detection. It discusses the impact of lines on transient detection, false alarm rates, and noise floor efficiency. The Median-Based Line Tracker (MBLT) algorithm is introduced as a robust method for line removal. It highlights the advantages of using a running median over traditional filters in maintaining signal integrity amid noise transients. The efficiency of MBLT in handling multiple lines with a focus on computational feasibility is also addressed.

sonel
Télécharger la présentation

Median Based Line Tracker

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Median Based Line Tracker Soumya D. Mohanty Max Planck Insitut für Gravitationsphysik LIGO-G020034-00-Z

  2. Lines and why remove them • Lines are not fundamental noise sources (except violin mode thermal noise) • Effects of lines: examples • Higher false alarm rates for transient tests • Reduction in efficiency of noise floor non-stationarity tracking. LIGO E7 run

  3. MBLT: Basic Motivations(S.D.Mohanty, CQG, 2002) • Need to have a model independent line removal method • There are usually more lines than models • Violin modes (Kalman filter) • Power Lines (CLRT) • Cross-channel regression requires that the predictor channel have • a high SNR for the line to be removed. • a stationary noise background (and no strong transients)

  4. MBLT v/s Notch Filters • Notch filters are model independent • Subtracting away line estimate found from notch filters takes away power from transients • If there are a lot of lines, the loss of collective bandwidth can be important • MBLT was created to be a notch filter that is more robust against transients

  5. Algorithm • Heterodyne data at every line carrier frequency • Make a smoothed estimate of the two noisy quadratures • Modulate a carrier with the smoothed estimates • Using a running mean for smoothing is equivalent to a notch filter Use the Running Median instead : rejects outliers unlike the mean

  6. Not over yet ... • The main contamination comes not from background noise but from nearby lines! • Remove all other lines except one • Estimate that line again • Do the same for all lines • Iterate

  7. Main problem • Finding the median of a set involves sorting which is computationally expensive • But getting a running median is much easier since most of the points are already sorted • C code for a running median written (Mohanty 2001) • Reduces O(Nm^2) tp O(Nm^0.5)

  8. Cleaned data

  9. Effect of transient

  10. Cleaned data; Periodogram

More Related