1 / 7

GIs and origin-linked products for territorial development

GIs and origin-linked products for territorial development. Lessons learnt from field projects in “developing countries”. Emilie Vandecandelaere FAO, Quality & Origin manager. Background From the “concept” to the realities: a large varieties of approaches

steinerm
Télécharger la présentation

GIs and origin-linked products for territorial development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GIs and origin-linked products for territorial development Lessons learnt from field projects in “developing countries” Emilie Vandecandelaere FAO, Quality & Origin manager

  2. Background • From the “concept” to the realities: a large varieties of approaches • Challenges related to institutions • Conclusions

  3. FAO program Quality & Origin Framework:project in 2007 and inter-departemental working group Main objective:to provide guidance and technical support on voluntary standards and schemes, including specific quality (SQ) schemes. SQ linked to geographical origin: to enhance potential for sustainable rural development (remuneration and reproduction of local resources) Means: • Sharing information and knowledge: • Regional seminars (Mediterranean, 2 Latin America, Asia, Southeastern Europe) and expert meeting, workshop) • case studies (8 Latin America, 3 Eastern European countries, 2 Mediterranean, 6 Asia) • Guidance tools (guide FAO-sinerGI, training material, methodology for identification and inventory) • Technical cooperation projects:Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey (in formulation), Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica, Chile, Ecuador, Perú, Asia, Bhutan, Vietnam, Ukraine, Croatia, Mali, Senegal, Guinea Bissau, Sierra Leone, etc.

  4. “GI”: variety of approaches • From 1994, a general concept of “GI” as IPR “characteristics, quality or reputation linked to geographical origin” and varieties of definitions at national level… • Various visions and approaches in the fields: • Specific quality: objective vs subjective, justification and type of value linked to origin? • Strategies of “building value”: differentiation for export vs territorial development, local identity or market driven? • Objectives: economics vs public goods ; bottom –up vs top down? • Evaluation, ownership and user: public/private, IP/agriculture-development, who does what? • Protection and level of guarantees for producers and consumers Shift from protecting established value to building one... With important external support (or pushing) • Issues of preserving natural and cultural heritage, including food diversity... Is GI the best tool? (environement practices, indigeneous rights, one product or a basket...)

  5. Issues and challenges… Risk of delusions... • Local institutions: • “ stewardship”, appropriation by local actors • building the value chain and the GI organization • National institutions and international : • coordination bewteen sectors (IP, agriculture, etc.) • International recognition: need for a common basis, importance of regional approach – Mediterranean! (CoP, representative GI body...) • Investment and returns... • Time for learning process • Unexpected impacts

  6. Conclusions • Local process: • GI strategy possible if specificquality linked to geographical origin • Preservation of natural and cultural heritage: if part of the specific quality • Conditions for territorial development = identity and appropriation • Impacts depend on local resources and process; not on registration as such •  start with IDENTIFICATION (specific quality, local motivations and local players) to assess the right tool and labelling • National: • A sound legal and institutional framework for recognition and protection • Support policies for enabling conditions for territorial development, in support of the process (at 4 steps of virtuous circle)

  7. www.qualityorigin.org Thank you emilie.vandecandelaere@fao.org

More Related