1 / 16

How were the Five-Year Plans organised?

How were the Five-Year Plans organised?. L/O – To identify how the Five-Year Plans were planned and organised. What were the Five-Year Plans?.

Télécharger la présentation

How were the Five-Year Plans organised?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. How were the Five-Year Plans organised? L/O – To identify how the Five-Year Plans were planned and organised

  2. What were the Five-Year Plans? • The Five-Year plans put central planning at the forefront of the Soviet economy. The state decided what was produced, where it was produced and when it was produced. • The key features of the plans was the setting of production and output targets which industrial enterprises had to achieve. • The targets were backed by law, so failure to meet targets could be treated as a criminal offence. Bonuses were paid to enterprises that exceeded their targets.

  3. People’s Commissariats • The party, acting through the government, set the priorities for the plans and the targets for key industries. • The People’s Commissariats (ministries or government departments) were responsible for working out more detailed plans for different regions. • Four major ones had developed by 1934; heavy industry, light industry, timber and food. By 1939, there were 20 commissariats.

  4. How the Five-Year Plans were administered using changes to heavy industry as an example

  5. Bureaucratic Management • In theory, industrial enterprises could have a say in the plan, but in practice, instructions would be passed down through bureaucratic layers to the managers of the enterprises. • It was a top-down method of management which applied in the workplace as well. The principle of one-person management was established right at the beginning. • The director of an industrial enterprise was in sole charge and responsible for seeing that targets were achieved.

  6. Gosplan • Gosplan (the State Planning Commission) co-ordinated the activities of the different branches of industry to balance the system. • It was originally set up in 1921 as a forecasting agency, and was given the job of working out the figures – the inputs each industry would need and the output each had to produce – to meet overall targets for the plan.

  7. Party Interference • The party also interfered in the day-to-day running of enterprises. It had a grip on the economy at all levels. Senior party officials appointed and dismissed planners and senior managers, often for political rather than economic reasons. • At the local level, the party got involved in checking whether enterprises were fulfilling the plans; party secretaries were held responsible if industrial enterprises in their area did badly.

  8. Planning required to achieve targets

  9. Features of the Plans • The plans in the 1930s were dominated by an emphasis of heavy industry. Stalin wanted most investment to go into coal, iron, steel and other heavy industries. • These would provide the power, capital equipment and machine tools that could be used to manufacture other products. • The USSR would then be less dependent on the West for these goods and could move towards self-sufficiency.

  10. Features of the Plans • This decision meant that producing consumer goods, like clothes and shoes, would be downgraded. Soviet citizens were asked to sacrifice their standard of living for longer-term objectives. • There were two reasons for this: • It seemed to Stalinists that Western industrial revolutions had been underpinned by development of coal, iron and steel. • They were driven by the need to develop the sort of industries that could protect the USSR from attack.

  11. Other features • Plan were always declared complete a year ahead of schedule. This was to prove to the world the Soviet planning was better than Western capitalism. Also a psychological device to encourage workers. • Huge new industrial centres were constructed from nothing, usually east of the Ural mountains, safe from attack from the West. I.e. Magnitogorsk. • Spectacular new projects. ‘Gigantomania’. Dnieprostroi Dam in eastern Russia, was the worlds largest construction site, increased electric power x5, Moscow Metro, Moscow-Volga Canal

  12. Magnitokorsk Steel Works

  13. Dnieprostroi Dam

  14. Moscow Metro

  15. Foreign Participation • One aspect of industrialisation in the 1930s was foreign involvement. A large number of Western companies sent specialists, engineers and skilled workers to help erect new factories. • Henry Ford helped develop a car industry. Colonel Hugh Cooper was in charge of the Dnieprostroi Dam project – an American! • Some came for ideological reasons – they were communist – but others because of unemployment in the West. The Great Depression convinced many that Capitalism was dying.

  16. Questions • Explain what central planning or the ‘planned economy’ means with examples. • How does a planned economy differ from a market-led economy? • Draw diagrams or charts to help you remember how the Five-Year Plans operated. • What was Gosplan’s role in the Plans? • Why did foreign workers become involved?

More Related