1 / 16

Evolution of UK Immigration Policy: From Thatcher to the New Economy

Explore the transformation of UK immigration policy from Thatcher's era to the new economy, analyzing impacts, changes in job markets, and implications for politics.

stephenr
Télécharger la présentation

Evolution of UK Immigration Policy: From Thatcher to the New Economy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Politics of Immigration in Hard Times Don Flynn

  2. Outline of argument • The character that immigration took in the noughties has its origins in the reconstruction of the UK economy which took place in the 1980s • The key features of this were the de-regulation of labour markets and the use of social welfare systems to defuse protest and manage the transition to the new economy. • It took a decade and a half for the implications of these changes to feed into immigration but the lineagew is there to be traced.

  3. Thatcher’s reforms create the need for a new type of working class • Post-war capitalism was built on a model which assumed a strong partnership between the state and capital. • Capital prepared to commit to long-term investment in activities that supported the employment of a skilled working class, but required the state provide it with this class, appropriately educated and socialised to meet the needs of Fordist production. • Features of this model – jobs for life, regulation and a role for unions, the male family wage.

  4. Problems with this model • Required regulation to provide stable conditions that would encourage long-term investment. • Also, high rates of taxation to support state services • A state bureaucracy to oversee economic planning • Consequently a marginal role for the commercial middle classes who also carried what they thought were unacceptably high levels of taxation

  5. Implications for immigration policy • Immigration associated with ‘bottlenecks’ in manufacturing and the public sector. • Periods of downturn and reduced demand for labour could be rapidly translated into more restrictive immigration policies. • This was particularly the case after 1973 when the rationalisation of industry forced by the OPEC oil crisis brought back large-scale unemployment. • This reduced labour demand encouraged the view that the immigration legislation of this period was working.

  6. Thatcher’s settlement • Deregulation of labour markets • Increased mobility of capital (floating exchange rates, the City ‘Big Bang’, etc) • Sharp decline in industrial sectors that has provided a base for trade union power. • The ‘liberation’ of the middle classes through lower taxation and increased opportunties to leverage value from asset inflation. • Squeeze on the public sector

  7. Outcomes • Much smaller industrial base • Decline in skilled jobs offering life-long employment prospects • Expansion of jobs in service sector • Higher proportion of lower paid jobs • Cushioning the danger of social tension through the large-scale use of social welfare allowing large numbers of middle-aged males to be weased out the labour market • An economic recovery driven by more intensive market competition.

  8. Implications for immigration • No immediate expansion of demand for immigrations emerging from these market driven reforms. • But external effects – Thatcherism allied with US power to become the neo-liberalism that filled the vacuum in the post-Cold War period – began to produce a more volatile situation internationally bringing larger numbers of workers into migration systems. • This intially seen as increased refugee flows, but latterly became economic migration.

  9. 1990s onwards – the new economy and migration demand • By mid-1990s capitalism was emerging as a competitive system in which firms gained advantage by managing supply chains – off-shoring but also just-in-time production domestically. • Ultra-flexible labour force had been summonsed but in conditions of broadly full-employment as a result of a long boom and labour supply restricted by social welfare provisions that provided for subsistence. • Demand for labour therefore flowed over into a new phase of immigration.

  10. Implications for politics • New Labour reconfigured the objective of immigration management away from ‘reduction to an irreducible minimum’ to policies which supported growth. • Required a reform of work permit system geared towards skilled migration, but also measures aimed at easing bottlenecks at low skilled ends. • This project configured in managerialist terms – low level of confidence that ordinary citizens would welcome immigration.

  11. Ambiguous messages – growth of mistrust • Negative perceptions of refugees • Surveillance of economic migrants – ID cards, etc • Undermining of rights of EU migrants – residence test, etc • Claim for policy rooted in a strong evidence base fundamentally challenged by experience of 2004 accession • Considerable loss of lustre as capable managers but the full force of a backlash still some years away.

  12. 2008 and collapse of New Labour competence • Space now exists for the backlash to more fully develop • Claims of competition between natives and migrants becomes more plausible. • Evidence for this is claimed in the form of wage pressure, youth unemployment, and pressure on public services. • Centre right furnished with arguments which allow it to chip away working class support for Labour

  13. Coalition produces ‘new’ immigration messages • ‘Broken borders’ • Uncontrolled EU migration • Loss of capacity to select ‘good migrants’ and deport the bad • Pressures from population growth. • Need to reduce net migration.

  14. Wider policy agendas • Immigration an obstacle to completing the drive to reform social welfare provision and make it a more effective instrument for disciplining the working class through conditionality, etc • But stronger restrictions also threaten to break up old alliances with business community and also the drive to put higher education on a business footing. • Demographic issues – how does the Tory party avoid alienating the rising ethnic minority middle classes?

  15. Medium and longer-term prospects • Demand for labour migration unlikely to diminish – now too strongly written into the business plans of important stakeholders • Mainstream parties also unable to develop a credible narrative which supports their claim that migration can be managed through stronger policing and more selectivity • Outcome is likely to be the consolidation of immigration as a part of the platform of stronger right wing current in mainstream politics • But still no practical answers to how migration can be better managed/

  16. Thanks • Don Flynn • Migrants’ Rights Network • www.migrantsrights.org.uk • d.flynn@migrantsrights.org.uk • #donflynnmrn

More Related