SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Innovative Author Profiling Platforms in Academic Research: A Comprehensive Overview

stephensj avatar
stephensj
26 diapositives · 311 Views · Dec 21, 2019

Explore ORCID, Scopus Author Identifier, ResearcherID, PubMed profile, Google Scholar Citations, ResearchGate, Mendeley, IDEAS/RePEc, Publons, and ReviewerCredits. Learn about their features, benefits, and impact on academic research. Find the best tools for author identification and validation.

Innovative Author Profiling Platforms in Academic Research: A Comprehensive Overview - slide 1
01 / 26Innovative Author Profiling Platforms in Academic Research: A Comprehensive Overview
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Innovative Author Profiling Platforms in Academic Research: A Comprehensive Overview
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Profiling Armen Yuri Gasparyan, MD, PhD, FESC Associate Professor of Medicine Member, World Association of Medical Editors

  2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209927/pdf/CroatMedJ_57_0527.pdfhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5209927/pdf/CroatMedJ_57_0527.pdf

  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639053/pdf/jkms-32-1749.pdfhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5639053/pdf/jkms-32-1749.pdf

  4. ORCID • Launched in 2012 • Free profile • Uniform Record Locators (URLs) or in a short form of 16 characters • 4,682,649  iDs • Universal profile for authors, reviewers, editors and other scholars • Useful for name disambiguation (especially for non-Anglophone authors) • Integrated with Scopus • Includes biographical note, list of articles, links to Publons https://orcid.org/

  5. Scopus Author Identifier • Automatic profiling platform of the largest bibliographic database • Integrated with ORCID • Linked to article-level altmetrics (PlumX) • H-index, total cites, total docs, annual papers/cites • Allows analyses within predefined timeframe (3-5 years)

  6. ResearcherID • Since 2008 (as a name disambiguation solution) • Profile for authors visible on Web of Science • Integrated with ORCID • Includes biographical note, list of articles • Inappropriately used by ‘predatory’ press • Lost its popularity

  7. https://www.emeraldcityjournal.com/2016/12/is-it-time-to-retire-researcherid/https://www.emeraldcityjournal.com/2016/12/is-it-time-to-retire-researcherid/

  8. Analysis of 4,307 Norwegian researchers' profiles • ResearcherID was the least popular platform, with 130 ID holders (3%) • 1,307 with ResearchGate (30%) • 333 with Google Scholar (8%) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643921/pdf/pone.0142709.pdf

  9. PubMed profile • Free, rapidly updated, primary research tool for biomedics • Based on MEDLINE and PubMed Central items • MEDLINE linked to MeSH vocabulary of NLM • No unique author identifiers • Profiling depends on correct author names and their affiliations • Helps to find peer reviewers • PubMed Central and ORCID are integrated • Assessing article-level Altmetrics through Bookmarklet

  10. Google Scholar Citations • Free alternative to other global citation-tracking services • No validation • Tool for authors with at least 1 article, book, and non-reviewed sources • Helpful for authors poorly visible on Scopus and WoS (social scientists, non-Anglophone authors) • Profiles of deceased available • Profiles filled with photos, links to profiles of co-authors, h-indices • ‘Predatory’ items is a big issue

  11. ResearchGate • Largest social networking sites for researchers (>4.5 mln users) • Platform for sharing articles and interacting with potential collaborators, and discussion forum • Profiles incorporate photos, keywords, links to published articles • Individual archiving (CC lincenses considered) and citation tracking • RG score available for ranking • ResearchGate and Google Scholar cover the same items, with early archiving of pre-published articles on ResearchGate

  12. 55 highly cited papers (from ESI) • 107 researchers • 64.5% were found in RG

  13. Mendeley • Since 2008 • Owned by Elsevier (since 2013) • Reference management platform • Social networking for 6 mln users • Import documents from PubMed, ArXiv, Google • Linked to Altmetrics

  14. IDEAS/RePEc • Since 1997 • Linked to AmEconAssoc EconLit database https://ideas.repec.org/

  15. Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2014.16102

  16. Publons • Launched in 2012 • Acquired by Clarivate Analytics in 2017 • >350,000 users, >25,000 journals covered • Free platform for users • Business model - partnership with publishers • Integrated with ORCID • Credits for reviewers who list their accomplishments (official responses from publishers are required for each post) • Helps editors to find best reviewers

  17. Publons partners

  18. Publons profiles

  19. ReviewerCredits activities • Since 2016 • 5818 active users (32 from Russia) • Certification of reviewer activities • Certification of conference talks • Editing services through Enago https://www.reviewercredits.com/ https://www.unimib.it/

  20. Conclusions • Several profiles linked to different databases are advisable • Profiling depends on users’ validation skills • Validation tools are required to avoid ‘predatory’ items • Profiles are used to choose peer reviewers