1 / 26

Distributed Query Processing using different Semijoin operations.

Distributed Query Processing using different Semijoin operations. Presented By: Jamal Uddin Ahamed Friday,March12,2004. Presentation Outline:. 1.Overview. 2.Semijoin Operation.

svein
Télécharger la présentation

Distributed Query Processing using different Semijoin operations.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Distributed Query Processing using different Semijoin operations. Presented By: Jamal Uddin Ahamed Friday,March12,2004

  2. Presentation Outline: 1.Overview. 2.Semijoin Operation. 3. Different semijoin operations. a. 2 way semijoin. b.Hash Semijoin. c.Domain Specific Semijoin. d. Composite semijoin. 4. References. 5.Questions and Answer.

  3. 1.1 What is distributed database system? • A distributed database system is characterized by the distribution of the system components of hardware ,control and data. For this research, a distributed system is a collection of independent computers interconnected via point-to-point communication lines.

  4. 1.2 Node Characteristics: Each computer , known as a node in the network, has a processing capability, a data storage capability, and is capable of operating autonomously in the system. Each node contains a version of a distributed DBMS.

  5. 1.3 What is distributed query processing? • The retrieval of data from different sites in a network is known as distributed query processing.

  6. 1.4 Phases of distributed query processing with a semijoin operator. • Initial Local processing (Selections and Projects are processed at each site.) • Semijoin processing ( A semijoin program) is derived from the remaining join operations and executed to reduce the size of the relations in a cost-effective way) • Final processing (all relations involved are transmitted to final site and all joins are performed there.)

  7. 2.1 Semijoin: • A semijoin from Ri to Rjon attribute A can be denoted as Rj⋉ Ri .It is used to reduce the data transmission cost. Computing steps: • Project Ri on attribute A (Ri[A] ) and ship this projection ( a semijoin projection) from the site of Ri to the site of Rj; • Reduce Rjto Rj’ by eliminating tuples where attribute A are not matching any value in Ri[A] .

  8. R1[A] Site 2 Site 1 R2 R1 A B A C Ship(3) projection 3 7 1 1 4 2 4 8 2 5 reduce Ship(6) 9 3 5 3 3 6 7 Ship(2) R2’ qs 2.2 Example: Example (semijoin s: R1—AR2): Benefit (s) = 6 -2 = 4 Cost (s) = 3 Cost effectiveness D(s) = B(s)-C(s) >0

  9. 3.a.1 Definition of 2 way semijoin. 2-way Semijoin—an extended version of the semijoin • Definition: A 2-way semijoin (t) of Riand Rjon attribute A can be denoted as RiARj = {Ri—ARj, Rj—ARi } So t reduces Riand Rj to Ri’ and Rj’ respectively.

  10. 3.a.2 Properties of 2 way semijoin. • Computing steps: • Send Ri [A] from site i to site j ; • Reduce Rj to Rj’ by eliminating tuples whose attribute A are not matching any of Ri [A] and at the same time partition Ri [A] to Ri [A]m (match one of Rj [A]) and Ri [A]nm(Ri [A]- Ri [A]m) ; • Send min(Ri [A]m , Ri [A]nm) back to site i ; • Reduce Rito Ri’ using Ri [A]m (or Ri [A]nm) . • Evaluation: • Benefit: B(t) = [S(Ri ) - S(Ri ’)] + [S(Rj) - S(Rj’)] • Cost: C(t) = S(Ri [A] ) + min[S(Ri [A]m ) , S( Ri [A]nm)] • If the benefit exceeds the cost (D(t) >0) then it is called a cost-effective 2-way semioin

  11. R1[A] Site 2 Site 1 R2 R1 A B A C Ship(3) projection 7 1 1 3 4 1 R1[A]m partition Ship(1) 4 2 2 8 5 2 3 R1[A]nm reduce reduce 3 3 9 3 5 3 6 7 6 R1’ R2’ Ship(2) Ship(2) qs 3.a.3 2-way semijoin example.

  12. 3.a.4 Semijoin Vs 2-way semijoin. -It is an extended version of semijoin. • It has more reduction power than semijoin. • The propagation of reduction effects by the 2-way semijoin is further than by the semijoin.

  13. 3.b.1 Hash-semijoin operator. Main idea :use a search filter which represents the semijoin projection with a small bit array . Definition: The hash-semijoin of Ri and Rj is denoted Rj∝ Ri. It is computed as follow: • The Semijoin projection of Ri is represented as a bit array; • Shipping this bit array to the site of Rj ; • finally, the tuples of Rj are screened by the search filter.

  14. S# 3 1 S# 1 333 Name Phone 4 3 1 2 0 444 Cindy 222 3 4 3 1 333 Jemal B 4 8 4 1 Sunny 444 S#(R1) 0 8 5 Maggie 555 0 6 666 • Hij((Ri))Bij • Ship(Bij) Rj projection 0 H(x)=X 1 reduce 3.b.2 hash semijoin example. R2 R1

  15. 3.b.3 Semijoin Vs Hash Semijoin. • Advantages: • Hash-semijoin is more cost-effective than semijoin • The search filter in the hash-semijoin achieves considerable savings in the cost of a semijoin operation • Limitation: • Only works on execution tree • Tightly related with the hash functions

  16. 3.c.1 What is horizontally partitioned database We can call a distributed database system is horizontally partitioned (or fragmented) if the relations can be split horizontally into several disjoint sets of tuples, which are called horizontal fragments.

  17. 3.c.2 Horizontally partitioned database system.(Example) EMP1: 1D-no10 EMP  EMP2: 11D-no20

  18. 3.c.3 Horizontally partitioned database system.(Properties) • A fragmented relation Ri can be constructed by performing a union operation on all its fragment. Ri = Uk Rik • There is commutative rule between the binary operations join and union for fragmented relations: a join between two fragmented relation R1 andR2 is equivalent to a union over the joins between each fragment of R1 and each fragment of R2. Mathematically: (U R1k)[A=B] (U R2m)= U(R1k[A=B] R2m) k mk.m

  19. 3.c.4 Why can’t we use regular semjoin between two fragment to reduce the size of fragments?(Continue) We consider a jointRi[A=B] Rj between two fragmented relations Ri and Rj. We want to reduce the size of Rik, a fragment of Ri , by semijoin before it is sent to the final processing site. We cannot perform the semijoin Rik A=B] Rjm between Rik and any fragmentRjm of Rj without considering the other fragment Rjm of Rj , because the join operation dictates that no tuple of a relation can be eliminate before it is compare with all tupls of the other joining relation which may be contribute to the join.

  20. Example: sal: 101E-no105 EMP1: 1D-no10 EMP2: 11D-no20 sal: 105E-no110

  21. 3.c.5 Definition of Domain Specific Semijoin. The domain-specific semijoin operation, Rik( A=B] Rjm, where A and B are the joining attributes andRik, Rjm are twofragments of the joining relation Ri and Rjrespectively, is defined as follows: Rik( A=B] Rjm ={r|r Rik ; r.A  Rjm [B] U(Dom[Rj.B]-Dom[Rjm.B])} Where Rik is the restricted fragment and Rjm is the restricting fragment. We also called Ri the restricted relation andRj is the restricting relation of the domain-specific semijoin.

  22. 3.d.1 Definition of Composite Semijoin. • Composite Semijoin: a semijoin in which the projection and the transimssion involve multiple columns (attrs).

  23. 3.d.2 Example of Composite Semijoin. R2 R1 No False loop!!

  24. 3.d.3 Semijoin Vs Composite Semijoin. • Composite semijoins in a query processing algorithm is likely to result in substantial RT reduction. • Composite semijoins should not always be used. If it results greater RT, ignore it. • Strategy with composite semijoins is at least as good as that without composite semijoins.

  25. References: • Using 2-way semijoin in distributed query processing. By Hyunchul Kang and Nick Roussopoulos. • Improving distributed query processing by hash-semijoins. By Judy Tseng and Arbee Chen. • Domain Specific Semijoin:A new operation for distributed query processing. By Jason Chen and Victor Li. • Composite Semijoin in distributed query processing. By William Perrizio and Chun Chen

  26. Comments & Questions?? Thank You!

More Related