1 / 47

Direct Instruction

Direct Instruction. Michael J. Fimian. Direct Instruction Overview. What Is It? Why Use It? A Brief History Exemplars , Direct Instructional Model Attributes Calendar Skills Conclusion , Items , and References. Direct Instruction: What Is It?. Instruction.

tanek
Télécharger la présentation

Direct Instruction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Direct Instruction Michael J. Fimian

  2. Direct Instruction Overview • What Is It? • Why Use It? • A Brief History • Exemplars, Direct Instructional Model • Attributes • Calendar Skills • Conclusion, Items, and References

  3. Direct Instruction: What Is It? Instruction

  4. Direct Instruction: What Is It? Instruction Direct

  5. Direct Instruction: What Is It? Instruction Direct Indirect

  6. Background

  7. Background

  8. A Brief History... • It all started In the ‘60s… • S.Engelmann -- preschool with his kids • C.Bereiter in the Midwest • Both moved to UFO in late ‘60s • Secured Federal Funding for large scale projects, later with W.Becker • Researched in 1970s and 1980s • reading -- SRA

  9. Exemplars of Direct Instruction • There’s DI and there’s “DI” • First, second, third generation trainers • CA, TA, teach anything • DISTAR • Direct Instructional System for Teaching Arithmetic and Reading (+ Language)

  10. Direct Instruction Model AO Phases I

  11. Direct Instruction Model AO Presentation Phases I II

  12. Direct Instruction Model AO Generalization Presentation Phases I II III

  13. Direct Instruction Model AO Generalization Presentation Probe Phases I IV II III

  14. Direct Instruction Model AO Generalization Lead-in Presentation Probe Phases I IV V II III

  15. Direct Instruction Model • Review of previously-learned material • State the objectives • Present new material • Guide practice • Independently practice • Periodic review with “connective feedback”

  16. Direct Instruction: What Is It Not? Direct Instruction + Attributes - Attributes

  17. Attributes of DI -- Common Term • Direct Instruction • Tutorial • Indirect Instruction • Experiential

  18. Attributes of DI -- Philosophy • Direct Instruction • Instructivist by nature • Indirect Instruction • Constructivist by Nature

  19. Attributes of DI -- Messaging • Direct Instruction • Direct Messaging • Indirect Instruction • Indirect Messaging

  20. Attributes of DI -- Learner Role • Direct Instruction • Learner is passive receptor • Indirect Instruction • Learner is active receptor

  21. Attributes of DI -- “Directedness” • Direct Instruction • Instruction is Direct • Indirect Instruction • Instruction is Indirect

  22. Attributes of DI -- Environment • Direct Instruction • Instructional environment -- minimized • Indirect Instruction • Instructional environment -- vital

  23. Attributes of DI -- Environment • Direct Instruction • Instructional environment -- not acted upon • Indirect Instruction • Instructional environment -- acted upon

  24. Attributes of DI -- Environment • Direct Instruction • Instructional environment -- not important • Indirect Instruction • Instructional environment -- important

  25. Attributes of DI -- Content • Direct Instruction • “Focussed” content • Indirect Instruction • “Unfocussed” content

  26. Attributes of DI -- Student Given... • Direct Instruction • all of the pieces • Indirect Instruction • some of the pieces

  27. Attributes of DI -- Structure • Direct Instruction • instruction “structures” the pieces • Indirect Instruction • learner “structures” the pieces

  28. Elements of Instruction

  29. Attributes of DI -- Reasoning Types • Direct Instruction • allows for both inductive (top down) and deductive (bottom up) training • Indirect Instruction • allows for problem solving

  30. Attributes of DI -- “Understanding” • Direct Instruction • understanding is based on someone else’s structure • Indirect Instruction • learners must generate own “structure of understanding”

  31. Attributes of DI -- “Schema” • Direct Instruction • final “schema” is preset • Indirect Instruction • final “schema” is developed by learner

  32. Attributes of DI -- Samples... • Direct Instruction • Examples are appropriate; more the better... • Indirect Instruction • Simulations are appropriate; environments in which learner must solve problems

  33. Attributes of DI -- Type of Probes • Direct Instruction • Assessed by simple questions; closed-ended • Indirect Instruction • Assessed by sets of problems to be solved

  34. Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Attribute Instruction -- Range in a Continuum

  35. Sample DI: Calendar Skills

  36. Who Benefits from DI? • Does • Kids who are slower… • Kids who need structure -- at first • Kids who are being taught: • procedures • facts • concepts -- concrete to abstract • Instructional Software Developers

  37. Conclusion • DI is a tool... • Know when to use it; when not to… • Know the conditions under which it is best used… • Don’t use it all the time, or never • Don’t use it for all kids, or none

  38. Conclusion

  39. Conclusion

  40. Conclusion

  41. Conclusion

  42. Questions for Direct Instruction • What are some of the attributes of Direct Instruction (DI)? • Why can DI be thought of as being on a continuum, from DI to II. • Is DI for all kids? Why or why not? • For what type of instruction / kids is DI best suited?

  43. References • Baumann, J. F. (1988). Direct instruction reconsidered. Journal of Reading, 31(8), 712-718. • Becker, W. C., & Carnine, D. (1980). Direct instruction: An effective approach to educational intervention with the disadvantaged and low performers. In B. B. Lahey, & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp. 429-473). New York, NY: Plenum Press. • Darch, C. B. (1990). Research on direct instruction. In D. Carnine, J. Silbert, & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), Direct instruction reading (pp. 23-33). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.

  44. References • Engelmann, S., Becker, W. C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). The direct instruction follow through model: Design and outcomes. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 303-317. • Gersten, R. (1985). Direct instruction with special education students: A review of evaluation research. Journal of Special Education, 19(1), 41-58. • Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1986). Direct instruction in reading comprehension. Educational Leadership, 43(7), 70-78. • Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Woodward, J. (1987). Direct instruction research: The third decade. Remedial and Special Education, 8(6), 48-56.

  45. References • Gersten, R., & Keating, T. (1987). Long-term benefits from direct instruction. Educational Leadership, 44(6), 28-31. • Gersten, R., Keating, T., & Becker, W. (1988). The continued impact of the direct instruction model: Longitudinal studies of follow through students. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 318-327. • Gersten, R., Woodward, J., & Darch, C. (1986). Direct instruction: A research-based approach to curriculum design and teaching. Exceptional Children, 53(1), 17-31. • Graves, A. W. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disabilities Research, 1(2), 90-100.

  46. References • Kaiser, S., Palumbo, K., Bialozor, R. C., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). The effects of direct instruction with rural remedial education students: A brief report. Reading Improvement, 26(1), 88-93. • Kierstead, J. (1985). Direct instruction and experiential approaches: Are they really mutually exclusive? Educational Leadership, 42(8), 25-30. • Mathes, P. G., & Proctor, T. J. (1988). Direct instruction for teaching "hard to teach" students. Reading Improvement, 25(2), 92-97. • Proctor, T. J. (1989). Attitudes toward direct instruction. Teacher Education and Special Education, 12(1-2), 40-45.

  47. References • White, W. A. T. (1988). A meta-analysis of the effects of direct instruction in special education. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 364-374.

More Related