1 / 29

Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Julie Willis Jerry Schuster Chris Duross

Optical Stratigraphy of a Wasatch fault trench wall and a Maritian surface using watershed-based segmentation. Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Julie Willis Jerry Schuster Chris Duross. Motivation for digital trench wall logging Algorithm for separating rocks from fill Statistics Mars.

taylor-harper
Télécharger la présentation

Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Julie Willis Jerry Schuster Chris Duross

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Optical Stratigraphyof a Wasatch fault trench wall and a Maritian surfaceusing watershed-based segmentation Chaiwoot Boonyasiriwat Julie Willis Jerry Schuster Chris Duross

  2. Motivation for digital trench wall logging • Algorithm for separating rocks from fill • Statistics • Mars

  3. Motivation for digital trench wall logging Development of a colluvial wedge Pre-earthquake Earthquake 900 years later

  4. Mapleton, Utah “mega-trench”

  5. Mapleton Trench Level 1 Colluvial Wedge Channel Deposit 1 meter 1 meter Debris Flow 1 m • Develop a rock segmentation algorithm to separate clasts from matrix. • Determine whether colluvial wedges, debris flows and channel deposits can be statistically differentiated.

  6. 10 cm 10 cm

  7. 10 cm 10 cm

  8. 10 cm 10 cm

  9. 10 cm 10 cm

  10. 10 cm

  11. 10 cm

  12. 10 cm 10 cm

  13. 10 cm 10 cm

  14. 10 cm 10 cm

  15. 10 cm 10 cm

  16. 10 cm 10 cm

  17. 10 cm 10 cm

  18. Channel Deposit 2

  19. Mapleton Trench Level 1 Colluvial Wedge Channel Deposit 1 meter Debris Flow 1 m • Algorithm successfully separates rocks from fill – 80% accuracy. • Can colluvial wedges, debris flows and channel deposits be statistically differentiated? Compare: Orientation, Eccentricity, Percent Rock

  20. Colluvial Wedge 1 Orientation? Eccentricity? Percent Rock?

  21. Colluvial Wedge 3 Orientation? Eccentricity? Percent Rock?

  22. Debris Flow 1 Orientation? Eccentricity? Percent Rock?

  23. Channel Deposit 1 Orientation? Eccentricity? Percent Rock?

  24. Eccentricity 12.5% < 0.2 2.5% < 0.2 2.8% < 0.2 Channel Deposits: 32 % Colluvial Wedge: 48 % Debris Flow: 42 % Percent Rock

  25. Clast Orientation

  26. Mapleton Trench Level 1 Colluvial Wedge Channel Deposit 1 meter Debris Flow 1 m Can colluvial wedges, debris flows and channel deposits be statistically differentiated? Orientation – Colluvial Wedge Eccentricity, Percent Rock – Channel Deposits

  27. Mapleton Trench Level 1 ? Colluvial Wedge ? ? Channel Deposit 1 meter ? Debris Flow 1 m Future work: • Use the segmentation algorithm to objectively log trench walls and build data for more rigorous statistics • Mars and beyond . . .

  28. Martian Surface

  29. Mars Statistics Eccentricity Clast Orientation

More Related