1 / 20

How the other half lives: Prosthetic provision in other states

How the other half lives: Prosthetic provision in other states. Anna Frazer Prosthetist Hunter Prosthetics & Orthotics Service June 16 th 2006. Why different models?. Large land mass, small population Rehabilitation services Affected by geography Funding Affected by education facilities.

tehya
Télécharger la présentation

How the other half lives: Prosthetic provision in other states

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How the other half lives:Prosthetic provision in other states Anna Frazer Prosthetist Hunter Prosthetics & Orthotics Service June 16th 2006

  2. Why different models? • Large land mass, small population • Rehabilitation services • Affected by geography • Funding • Affected by education facilities

  3. “Best Practice” • Resources detailing guidelines for Amputee rehabilitation: • Anne Caudle Centre, Bendigo, Best Practice guide 1994 • 2005 Consensus conference- American Orthotic Prosthetic Association • NSW review of amputee services 2004 • BAPO, APA, AOPA • No consensus

  4. New South Wales • Funding • Inpatient • Wound care, surgery, and treatments, covered by bed day funds • Outpatient • ALS covers prosthetic needs with limits on funding for components • List provided of ‘approved’ components, many restrictions • Assistive devices may be covered by PADP

  5. New South Wales • Team involvement • 3 public facilities using prosthetists in rehabilitation • Physiotherapists providing primary prosthetic care and gait training • Prosthetists travel to regional areas for clinics

  6. Queensland • Funding • Inpatient • Hospital based treatment covered • Mechanical interim prostheses not funded • Outpatient • QALS funds definitive prostheses with limits • Assistive devices provided under MASS

  7. Queensland • Team • Varies according to location • 3 public facilities provide in-house prosthetic rehab • Rehabilitation Consultant not involved until the end of interim treatment • Prosthetists travel to rural areas for clinics

  8. Western Australia • Funding • Inpatient • Hospitals fund all treatments except prosthetic care • WALSA funds interim prostheses • Outpatient • WALSA funds definitive prostheses

  9. Western Australia • Team • 1 amputee rehabilitation consultant for all of WA • 1 public prosthetic rehab facility • 2 off-site private providers attend 2 rehab facilities • Physiotherapists fit and maintain RRDs • 5 prosthetists supplying all definitive limbs

  10. Northern Territory • Funding • Inpatient • Hospital covers all interim prosthetic care • 1st definitive also covered by hospital funds • Outpatient • NT ALS funds definitive services • Often provides funds for spare limbs due to large distances

  11. Northern Territory • Team • 1 amputee rehab facility in Darwin • 1prosthetic facility, at least 2 prosthetists • Outreach services provided to other territory rehab facilities • 1 private company from Sydney attends 4 x year • No RRDs being fitted

  12. Victoria • Funding • Inpatient • Hospital funding covers all treatments including prosthetics and orthotics- WEIS funding • Amputees classified as highest level funding • Outpatient • VALP funds prostheses and outpatient rehab if required

  13. Victoria • Team • 9 public prosthetic rehab facilities using MD teams • Prosthetists fitting mechanical interim prostheses • Patients travel to regional centres for prosthetic care

  14. Tasmania • Funding • Inpatient • Hospitals provide funds for bed days but OPST holds budget for all P&O services in Tasmania • Interim prostheses from OPST budget with limits preset to prevent exceeding budget • Outpatient • Same budget as interim prosthetics • Patients pay for componentry above certain limit

  15. Tasmania • Team • 3 amputee rehabilitation facilities • On and off-site prosthetists attend rehab wards • Prosthetists fit RRDs in recovery and provide follow-up care

  16. ACT • Funding • Inpatient • Hospital responsibility for interims • Outpatient • ACTALS, similar system to NSW • Team 1 rehab facility 2 clinics

  17. South Australia • Funding • Inpatient • Outpatient • Team

  18. Differences to note… • Acquittal methods • Difficulty in getting some patients to return for acquittal appointments, especially in rural areas • TAS provides peer review acquittal • QLD investigating allowing prosthetists to prescribe replacement limbs • Rural service difficulties • QLD may be investigating training rural staff in CAD-CAM systems

  19. Differences to note… • Therapeutic Goods Act • Affects all prostheses provided nationwide • Regulations regarding • use of second-hand componentry • quality programs • patient safety • post market surveillance

  20. Summary • Different models • Different timing • Different funding • Different staffing • … different outcomes?

More Related