1 / 14

The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

http://www.ifs.org.uk/elsa. The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Rebecca Taylor National Centre for Social Research. Sample design Who was sampled? Why? Any implications from design? Response rate to Wave 1 Analysis accounting for non-response accounting for sample design.

tender
Télécharger la présentation

The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. http://www.ifs.org.uk/elsa The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing Rebecca Taylor National Centre for Social Research

  2. Sample design Who was sampled? Why? Any implications from design? Response rate to Wave 1 Analysis accounting for non-response accounting for sample design Overview

  3. Aim of survey - investigate ageing Capture individuals before and during ageing Sample needed to represent a population that ages Interested in individuals and interactions of individuals within households In practice - select a sample that is representative of population aged 50 and over Sample Requirements

  4. Two choices randomly select addresses generating a general population sample and screen to remove youngest draw from an existing survey sample Advantages and disadvantages with each method Drawn from Health Survey for England (HSE) Annual cross-section of approximately 16,000 adults Representative of private households in England Three years of HSE used - 1998, 1999 & 2001 Sample Design 1

  5. Advantages Health measures provide ‘pre-baseline’ information Core content and varying supplementary modules No expensive eligibility screening in field Anticipate higher levels of response Disadvantages Does not include institutions (e.g. care homes) Individual adult response to HSE (67% to 70%) Ethical considerations for re-approaching respondents Sample Design 2

  6. Eligibility at Wave 1 • Core sample members born on or before 29th Feb 1952 • Other sample members invited for interview • Younger partners cohabiting with core sample at HSE • New partners of core sample who joined household since HSE • Not contacted directly if refused re-approach at HSE • BUT had chance to be interviewed if others in household • No interviews in institutions or outside England at Wave 1

  7. Response Rates • Issued sample of ~11,600 households; ~18,800 individuals • Achieved sample of ~7,900 households; ~12,100 individuals • ~11,400 interviews with core sample members • ~640 interviews with partners under 50 and ~70 with new partners • Response among core sample members • Overall individual response rate of 67% • Household response 70% • 96% responding within households

  8. Achieved Sample Size - All Sample Types Numbers % Age Men Women Total Men Women Total Under 50 104 472 576 2 7 5 50-54 920 1156 2076 17 17 17 55-59 1030 1171 2201 19 17 18 60-64 813 883 1696 15 13 14 65-69 806 912 1718 15 13 14 70-74 680 797 1477 13 12 12 75-79 498 596 1094 9 9 9 80+ 485 777 1262 9 11 10 Total 5336 6764 12100 100 100 100

  9. Accounting for response • Most significant level of non-response from households • Created weight to take account of household non-response and post-stratified to the Census 2001 age-sex profile of individuals • HSE data used to model non-response • Method = calibration weighting • Produced identical household and individual weights • Weight only produced for core sample members

  10. Elements of non-response • Some interviews were not completed - ‘partial’ • Some interviews were completed on behalf of the respondent by a ‘proxy’ • High response to elements within survey • Housing 99.7% • Income and assets 99.0% • Self-completion 92.0% • Consents c.80% • Imputation for missing values in economic variables

  11. Analysing the data • Select analysis sample • Core sample members (discard younger / new partners) • In-person interviews (discard partial/proxy interviews) • Weight the data • Account for the effect of the sample design

  12. Accounting for sample design • Complex sample design affects standard errors • HSE design used stratification and clustering • Standard errors too small if do not take into account • Can imply significant effects when not significant • Affects some variables more than others • Stata has facility to account for design (svy commands) • SPSS ‘Complex samples’ module has limitations

  13. Example - design effects

  14. Later waves • Interview every two years • Follow all who responded at Wave 1 • Split households • Follow all core sample members • Younger/new partners followed for one interview • Refreshment sample at Wave 3 • New cohort based on age to replenish the youngest • 50-53 years old at Wave 3

More Related