1 / 144

Seismic character of a fractured reservoir: A physical model study

Seismic character of a fractured reservoir: A physical model study. Robert Wiley: Apex Spectral Technology Byron Golden: Halliburton Peter Wilson, Scott Peters: Apex Spectral Technology. Objectives. To create a physical model of vertical fractures.

terra
Télécharger la présentation

Seismic character of a fractured reservoir: A physical model study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seismic character of a fractured reservoir: A physical model study Robert Wiley:Apex Spectral Technology Byron Golden: Halliburton Peter Wilson, Scott Peters: Apex Spectral Technology

  2. Objectives • To create a physical model of vertical fractures. • To confirm ability of geometric attributes applied to • subsurface fractures are sufficient and effective to • detect and evaluate the orientation of the vertical • fractures. • To confirm the ability of spectral attributes to • identify the orientation of vertical subsurface • fractures.

  3. Introduction • Fractures • Nearly all reservoirs contain some type of fracturing • Fracture may be found in entire range of rocks (cap rocks, • source rocks) and depths • Understanding connectivity of natural fracture systems • would economically facilitate oil recovery in low permeable • reservoirs

  4. Introduction • Fractures • Fracture numerical models and the accurate seismic • responses are difficult to mathematically describe • Physical modeling can provide insight into seismic • responses caused by fractures • Seismic responses from fractures can be evaluated/ • interpreted using several established methodologies

  5. Introduction • To look for lineaments or other anomalous patterns on • amplitude horizon slices. • Limitation – these anomalous patterns may not be in the • horizon plane • To pick seismic horizons and searching for changes of • formation time-thickness as a function of azimuth. • Limitation – results may suffer from interpreter picking errors • and or bias

  6. Introduction • To evaluate subtle changes in amplitude with azimuth. • Limitation – much time and expertise is require for • accurate studies

  7. Introduction Volumetric Attributes • Benefits: • Applied to uninterpreted data and to whole volume • Saves time from picking horizons • No unintentional interpreter errors and/or bias introduced

  8. Introduction • Volumetric attributes types applied: • Amplitude • Coherence • Curvature

  9. Introduction Amplitude • Color cube • Variable density • - Positive amplitude Coherence Energy Ratio

  10. Introduction Curvature • Positive • Negative

  11. Introduction Principle Component Filtering Def: a structure-oriented noise filter that retains coherent events; based on multi-window analysis of best-fit data to estimated dip/azimuth.

  12. synform saddle bowl antiform dome Lineament Quantification s=-1.0 The shape index, s: Strike s=-0.5 s=0.0 Curvedness, c: Strike s=+0.5 s=+1.0 Principal curvatures (Bergbauer et al., 2003)

  13. Methodology • Build Physical model with vertical fractures • Collect volume of data of various offsets over elastic physical model with embedded fracture media • Process 3D cubes and apply set of volumetric geometric attributes

  14. Methodology • Evaluate fracture discrimination using volumetric attributes • Amplitude • Coherent energy ratio • Positive curvature • Negative curvature • Increase resolution using special filters • Principle component filter • Lineament filter Chopra & Marfurt, 2007

  15. Physical Modeling Benefits of Physical Modeling • Experimental repeatability & controlled conditions • Very cost-effective compared to field work • Physics of elastic energy propagating through physical • models is same as real earth. • Arbitrary earthlike conditions closer to real earth data than • numerical modeling

  16. Physical Modeling Some Limitations • Limited bandwidthStrong resonance at one frequency-- • Limited to materials with specific elastic parameters • Difficult to build lateral velocity variations • Labor intensive • Can not model all real earth materials/layers, e.g. • weathering layers

  17. AGL’s 3m by 2m by 1.5m marine acquisition modeling system PhysMod - 17

  18. The Source and Receiver Motion Arms

  19. Spherical Transducer(Source and Receiver)

  20. Fracture Construction

  21. Fracture Construction Glass slides x Glass blocks 1.1 cm Resin 35.5 cm Fracture model under construction showing glass slides in situ y

  22. HTI model x Fracture zone y 50.8 cm 63.5 cm

  23. Acquisition & Processing

  24. Acquisition & Processing Geometry

  25. Acquisition & Processing Geometry

  26. 1071 CDP 1360 2 2.5 3 Line 2151

  27. Line 2140 500 m Offset 1071 CDP 1360 2.2 Time (s) 2.4 2.6 + -

  28. Line 2140 500 m Offset CDP 1150 1202 Curvature 2.4 2.6

  29. Positive amplitude 2.4 x y 500 m Offset z Time (sec) Line No 2144 2.5 1360 CDP No. 1071 -4000 Amplitude = 190.92 4000

  30. Positive amplitude 500 m Offset 1100 CDP No. 1320 z 2040 x y Line No 2140 2.5 Time (sec) 2.4 -4000 Amplitude = 190.92 4000

  31. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 CDP No Time (s) Time (s) 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120 2140 Line No -100 -50 0 50 100 0 Coherence 1 Coherent/ Total Energy 1000 m 500 m offset, 2.356 sec

  32. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 - Coherence + Time (s) 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120 2140 Time (s) Line No -100 -50 0 50 100 Coherent/ Total Energy 1000 m 500 m offset, 2.494 sec

  33. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 Time (s) Line No (-) (+) 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120 2140 Most Positive Curvature 1000 m 500 m offset, 2.356 sec

  34. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 Time (s) Line No (-) (+) 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120 2140 Most Positive Curvature 500 m offset, 2.494 sec 1000 m

  35. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 (-) (+) 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120 2140 Line No Time (s) Most Positive Curvature 1000 m 1000 m offset, 2.552 sec

  36. 500 m offset, 2.494 sec 1000 m offset, 2.552 sec

  37. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 (+) Time (s) Time (s) 2040 2060 2800 2100 2120 2140 Line No Time (s) (-) Most Negative Curvature 1000 m 500 m offset, 2.358 sec

  38. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 (+) Time (s) Time (s) 2040 2060 2800 2100 2120 2140 Line No Time (s) (-) Most Negative Curvature 1000 m 500 m offset, 2.494 sec

  39. CDP No 1080 1120 1160 1200 1240 1280 1320 1360 (+) Time (s) 2040 2060 2800 2100 2120 2140 Time (s) Line No Time (s) (-) Most Negative Curvature 1000 m 1000 m offset, 2.552 sec

  40. 500 m offset, 2.494 sec 1000 m offset, 2.552 sec

  41. (-) (+) (-) (+) Most Positive Curvature Most Negative Curvature 500 m offset, 2.494 sec

  42. Special type of filtering to further isolate already detected fracture zone • Principle component filter • Lineament

  43. SOF 500 m Offset Physical Modeling View 2 1071 1360 2.6 (-) Amplitude (+) Time z y x 2.4

  44. SOF 500 m Offset Physical Modeling View 2 x y z 2.4 (-) Amplitude (+) Time 1360 2.6 1071

  45. y Lineament 500 m Offset Physical Modeling x z -90 Azimuth=0 90 1100 1350

  46. Display of structural lineaments Strike -90 0 +90 strong Lineament Intensity weak 2D color bar for lineament attribute (strike=azimuth of valley/ridge) (al-Dossary and Marfurt, 2006)

  47. y x z Physical Modeling Lineament 500 m Offset 2.4 Time (s) -90 Azimuth=0 90 2.6 2140 2040 ALL OTHER COLORS MADE TRANSPARENT

  48. Positive Amplitude Principle Comp Filter Most Positive Curvature Most Negative Curvature

  49. Lineament

  50. Acquisition & Processing Round 2

More Related