1 / 23

Volunteer Angler Data Collection and Methods of Inference

Volunteer Angler Data Collection and Methods of Inference . Kristen Olson University of Nebraska-Lincoln February 2, 2012. Two perspectives on survey statistics. Survey quality framework ( Biemer and Lyberg , 2003) Adopted by many national statistical organizations around the world

thom
Télécharger la présentation

Volunteer Angler Data Collection and Methods of Inference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Volunteer Angler Data Collection and Methods of Inference Kristen Olson University of Nebraska-Lincoln February 2, 2012

  2. Two perspectives on survey statistics • Survey quality framework (Biemer and Lyberg, 2003) • Adopted by many national statistical organizations around the world • Total survey error framework (Groves, 1989) • Focus on one part of the survey quality framework

  3. Survey Quality • Accessibility • Availability of survey results to those who need them and are interpretable • Timeliness • Results are available when needed • Coherence • Related statistics can be combined • Completeness • Statistics are available for all needed domains • Accuracy • Difference between ‘truth’ and the estimate; measured by variance and bias of estimates or mean square error

  4. Survey Quality (2) • Dimensions combined should yield “fitness for use” • Assure quality through processes, as each dimension may be difficult to measure directly • Accuracy is one dimension of quality • But it is the “cornerstone” • With inaccurate data, many would argue (e.g., Biemer & Lyberg, 2003, p. 24) that the other quality dimensions don’t matter

  5. Measurement Representation Construct Target Population Coverage Error Validity Sampling Frame Measurement Sampling Error Measurement Error Sample Response Nonresponse Error Respondents Processing Error Adjustment Error Edited Response Postsurvey Adjustments Survey Statistic Groves, et al. 2004, Survey Methodology Figure 2.5

  6. TSE in notation

  7. Coverage Error • Gap between the • Target population - who/what you want to make inference to, including definitions of time and space - and • The sampling frame – list or set of methods and procedures used to construct a sample; want to be as complete as possible • Example: • Target population = All possible anglers at all possible sites for all possible species during the week containing June 1, 2012 in the state of Maryland • Sampling frame = List of marinas, docks and shore fishing sites; method to generate phone numbers for households; list of names and phone numbers of known anglers

  8. Coverage Error – Volunteer Surveys • Who is the target population? • Often the same as for probability-based surveys • What is the sampling frame? • May be difficult to define • If website and email, then can conceptualize loosely as persons who (1) have internet access, (2) log on to website or open email, (3) visit the part of the website that contains information about the volunteer angler program • If in-store flyers, then can conceptualize loosely as persons who (1) visit the store and (2) see the flyer

  9. Coverage Error – Why does it matter? • Potential source for bias in survey statistics Coverage rate = Proportion of target population missing from frame What you want Difference between those who are on frame and those who are not on frame on statistic of interest

  10. TSE in notation

  11. Sampling Error • Gap between • The sampling frame - list or set of methods and procedures used to construct a sample - and • The sample – the set of units (persons, households, businesses, etc.) that are contacted for data collection • Example: • Frame: List of known anglers • Sample: Subgroup of list of known anglers, selected with known probability

  12. Principles of Survey Samples • Realism • Sample reflects an actual population with real population parameters • Randomization • Chance mechanisms are used to select units, not personal judgment • Representation • Mirror or miniature of the population

  13. Two approaches to survey sampling • Chance based approach • Probability sampling • Dominates current survey practice • Purposive selection • Non-probability sampling • Purely purposive selection has very limited use for making statements about a population from the sample (inference).

  14. Two approaches to survey sampling (2) • Probability samples • All units on the frame have a known probability of selection. • The method for selecting units from the frame involves randomness or chance. • Any unit’s chance of selection is determined randomly using mechanical rules • Examples: Simple random samples, cluster samples, stratified random samples, probability proportionate to size samples • Non-probability samples • Units on the frame have unknown probabilities of selection. • The method for selecting units from the frame involves judgment. • Any unit’s chance of selection is determined by a personal (researcher or participant) decision. • Examples: Snowball samples, Quota samples, Convenience samples, Volunteer samples

  15. Sampling Error – Volunteer Surveys • What is the sampling frame? • May be difficult to define • What is the sampling mechanism? • Out of the control of the researchers / management organization • Probability of being selected into the sample is unknown • Unclear what the link is between the sample and the frame

  16. Sampling Error – Why does it matter? • With probability samples, there are no biasing (systematic) errors • That is, the sample estimates won’t be consistently too high or too low due to sampling error, although that does not rule out other error sources • The variable errors, known as ‘standard errors,’ have known and well-defined formulas and properties to link the sample back to the frame • They can be used define a range of plausible values in which the ‘true value’ is likely to fall, known as a ‘confidence interval’

  17. Sampling Error – Why does it matter? (2) • There is no uniformly accepted scientific method for linking a non-probability sample back to the sample frame • Many approaches have been tried, all using statistical models to try to make the non-probability method ‘look like’ the full population • Can make the non-probability sample align with the frame on certain characteristics that are used in the model, but no guarantee for other characteristics • Yeager, et al. (2011, POQ) compared adjusted estimates from 7 non-probability samples and 2 probability samples to a variety of benchmark criteria. The adjusted non-probability samples always had substantially higher error rates than the probability samples.

  18. TSE in notation

  19. Nonresponse Error • Gap between the • Sample – the people, households, businesses, or other units selected for data collection – and the • Respondents – the people, households, businesses or other units who actually participated in the data collection • Example: • Sample: Selected anglers randomly selected from a list of known anglers • Respondents: Anglers who actually completed the logbooks and other questions asked

  20. Nonresponse Error – Volunteer Surveys • Who is the sample? Who are the respondents? • Difficult to define these two groups separately, as the mechanism for selecting persons to participate is their own self-selection into the data collection effort

  21. Nonresponse Error – Why does it matter? • Potential source for bias in survey statistics Nonresponse rate = Proportion of frame population missing from respondents What you want Difference between those who responded and those who did not respondent on statistic of interest

  22. Nonresponse Error – Why does it matter? (2) • Potential source for bias in survey statistics Covariance between probability of participating and the survey variable of interest Nonresponse bias of the respondent mean Average probability of participating (similar to the response rate)

  23. Volunteer Surveys from a Survey Quality Framework • Accessibility • Easily accomplished for volunteer surveys • Timeliness • If collected by agency who needs the information, results can be accessed at any time. Question is whether the information is ‘complete’ • Coherence • May be difficult to compare volunteer data with official statistics • Completeness • May be limited, depending on characteristics of volunteers • Accuracy • Unknown, difficult to assess without external benchmarks • No assurance that the sample is linked to the population through a probability mechanism

More Related