1 / 34

Anatomy of an Appeal

Anatomy of an Appeal. Michelle A. Barrett, JD, RN mianbarrett@yahoo.com April 13, 2019. Learning Objectives. B egin to understand the procedural flow of denials and appeals Navigate the nuances of various payers Understand medical record review for appeal writing

thome
Télécharger la présentation

Anatomy of an Appeal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anatomy of an Appeal Michelle A. Barrett, JD, RN mianbarrett@yahoo.com April 13, 2019

  2. Learning Objectives Begin to understand the procedural flow of denials and appeals Navigate the nuances of various payers Understand medical record review for appeal writing Learn primary elements of written appeal

  3. Disclosure Note: This lecture is Michelle Barrett’s personal opinion and may not reflect the opinion of Mayo Clinic or ACDIS.

  4. Types of appeals Medical Necessity Inpatient medical necessity Clinical Validation

  5. Where the appeal starts Inpatient Hospital Admission & Discharge Coding & Billing Payment Received

  6. The request Request for Records Records Sent Results Review or Denial Letter Received

  7. Payers & Reviewers The Various Payers & Reviewers Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) (Medicare) Medicare Advantage Plan (MAP) UnitedHealthcare Humana Aetna Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield

  8. Payers & Reviewers Contracted Reviews for MAP Cotiviti EquiClaim OmniClaim MedReview

  9. The RAC appeal process 30 day discussion period (optional) 1. Redetermination by the Fiscal Intermediary 2. Reconsideration by a Qualified Independent Contractor 3. Administrative Law Judge Hearing 4. Medicare Appeals Council Review 5. Judicial Review in U.S. District Court A Primer on RAC Appeals – McGuireWoods - https://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/publications/health_care/Primer%20on%20RAC%20Appeals.pdf

  10. The RAC appeal process A Primer on RAC Appeals – McGuireWoods - https://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/publications/health_care/Primer%20on%20RAC%20Appeals.pdf

  11. The RAC appeal process Extensions: Acceptable – Illness of Key Staff Act of Nature Delay in Results Unacceptable – Internal Administrative Delays

  12. Map - payers appeal processes Contracted-Follow Contract versus Non-Contracted

  13. Map - payers appeal processes – Pre-recoupment MAP Contractor Various Time Frames 30, 45, 60 or 180 Days Contained in Results Letter Request Peer to Peer at Earliest Available Time

  14. Map - payers appeal processes – Post- recoupment Appeal Directly to the Payer Appeal Rights Explanation of Benefits Remittance Advise

  15. Map - payers appeal processes - Unitedhealthcare Cotiviti Level 1 Appeal Peer to Peer Conversation Appeal to UnitedHealthcare Directly Level 1 Appeal Peer to Peer Conversation

  16. Map - payers appeal processes – Humana Appeal to Humana Directly Three Levels of Appeal Peer to Peer Conversation

  17. Target diagnoses Sepsis Encephalopathy Acute respiratory failure – hypoxic or hypercapneic Malnutrition AKI w/ or w/o ATN NSTEMI or Type II MI

  18. Clinical validation Sepsis Sepsis 2 vs Sepsis 3 Per the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, “Adherence to these guidelines when assigning ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes is required under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). The diagnosis codes (Tabular List and Alphabetic Index) have been adopted under HIPPA for all healthcare settings.” See 45 Code of Federal Regulations (Subpart J) Section 162.1002

  19. Sepsis 2 resources https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5385979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5784683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27649072 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29404582 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289687

  20. Clinical validation Malnutrition OIG target – severe malnutrition, marasmus, and kwashiokor Diagnosis consistently documented Supporting clinical data Treatment plan

  21. Clinical validation Resources for Diagnoses UpToDate ACP Hospitalist

  22. For all appeals Thoroughly review the denial letter Determine what has been denied and the reason for the denial Address directly the issue being denied, citing references that rebut their position

  23. Review all medical records EMR and written documents Compare with the records submitted and ensure everything was submitted Ensure that you have a legible copy of everything submitted to review

  24. DRILL DOWN THE DENIAL Look at the denial letter to determine specifically why the reviewer determined that the diagnosis is not clinically supported. Examples include: NSTEMI-no EKG changes, not diagnosed by a cardiologist etc. Sepsis – no evidence of organ dysfunction Pneumonia – negative CXR

  25. DRILL DOWN THE DENIAL According to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (available late August, 2018), NSTEMI only requires a troponin rise and/or fall at the 99th URL with clinical evidence of unstable angina, an angina equivalent OR typical EKG changes May be caused by a supply demand mismatch such as respiratory failure or atrial fib with RVR) requiring treatment for what caused the mismatch Does not need to be diagnosed by a cardiologist Hospitalists are licensed providers

  26. DRILL DOWN THE DENIAL Sepsis Many organizations have not adopted the sepsis 3 definition There is now some question about the validity of the definition

  27. Writing the appeal Always use the patient’s name Personalize the patient Begin with stating the desired result Then state the facts surrounding the admission, including all clinical data that supports your position Vital signs, lab values, physical exam, documentation of the condition, etc., emphasizing where the documentation is found

  28. Writing the appeal Include any dispositive facts and explain why those facts do not negate the diagnosis, if possible The findings of the reviewer Why those findings are not correct, inapplicable to the fact situation, not the correct clinical definition of the diagnosis in question

  29. Writing the appeal Apply your clinical definition to the facts and demonstrate why that is supported ie the NSTEMI was in fact diagnosed by the cardiologist and where the documentation is contained Cite authoritative sources If multiple diagnoses are challenged, address each one separately and argue why it is in fact clinically supported

  30. Writing the appeal Finish with a statement that the hospital was correct in how it coded the case, “statused” the patient, etc. and thus the payment was correct

  31. Future use of clinical validation info Consider using the definitions from appeals supporting clinical diagnoses as the basis for clarifications.

  32. CDI Tips Ensure physical exam is consistent with diagnosis Encephalopathy Sepsis Severe malnutrition Ensure consistent documentation Including discharge summary

  33. Thank you & Questions Questions?

  34. Anatomy of an Appeal Michelle A. Barrett, JD, RN mianbarrett@yahoo.com 317-512-4067 April 13, 2019

More Related