1 / 8

Hypothesis Construction: The Basics of Variable Operationalization

Hypothesis Construction: The Basics of Variable Operationalization. PO 390W: Research Design for Political Science. From Concept to Measurement.

ting
Télécharger la présentation

Hypothesis Construction: The Basics of Variable Operationalization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hypothesis Construction: The Basics of Variable Operationalization PO 390W: Research Design for Political Science

  2. From Concept to Measurement • Thus far, our discussion of hypothesis has focused on conceptualization, or the process of formulating and clarifying concepts prior to any empirical investigation • However, in order to empirically test the relationships between concepts, we must achieve some difficult goals • All concepts are complex and variable; as such, they must be broken down into differential components and their variability must be made measurable • Many concepts are not directly observable; given that measurement is key to testing, we must find a way to utilize observable phenomena that reflect unobservable concepts

  3. Operationalization • Stage 1: Breaking Down Concepts • Example: We have theoretical reasons to believe that democracy is causally important in many processes. But what, conceptually, is democracy? Linked to our theory, it probably involves: • Participatory capacity • Insurance of civil liberties • Presence of a civic culture • Contestability of political office • Separation of powers • By breaking down concepts, we are able to: • Comprehensively identify the specific “underpinnings” of our theoretical expectations • Generate initial expectations about what we must measure to gain a comprehensive reflection of democracy

  4. Operationalization • Stage 2: Matching Conceptual Components to Observable Phenomena • Now that we’ve gotten an idea of what democracy consists of, what might its components look like in the real world? • Participatory capacity: The ability of citizens to participate in the selection and workings of their government • Insurance of civil liberties: The governmental guarantee of individual freedoms • Presence of a civic culture: Difficult – is it the willingness of the citizenry to take advantage to participatory opportunity? To respect the civil liberties of others? To actively agree on the legitimacy of government? All of the above? • Contestability of political office: The capacity of any citizen to obtain office • Separation of powers: Structural division of governmental responsibilities and limitations on the capacity of any subdivision to encroach on the responsibilities of others • Basic translation of conceptual components into generally observable phenomena

  5. Operationalization • Stage 3: The Development/Selection of Useable Indicators • How are we to empirically gauge these phenomena? We select measures that are variable, regularly observable, and reflective of as many stages of our conceptualization process as possible • Participatory capacity: Presence of laws protecting voting rights • Insurance of civil liberties: Presence of laws eliminating (or minimizing) the capacity of the government to regulate or violate individuals • Presence of a civic culture: Voter turnout; political association membership; frequency of political assembly • Contestability of political office: Absence of unreasonable governmental restrictions on office-holding • Separation of powers: Presence of laws mandating and enforcing separation of governmental responsibilities (including oversight) • Refinement of generally observable phenomena into classifiable, measureable indicators

  6. Measurement Characteristics • Levels of Measurement • Nominal: Categorization and numerical assignment for labeling • 0=Presidential Democracy, 1=Parliamentary Democracy; no assumption of ranking • Ordinal: Categorization and numerical assignment for comparison (greater/lesser) • 1= Undemocratic, 2=Quasi-Democratic, 3=Fully Democratic; mathematical rank ordering of outcomes • Interval: Intervals between measures represent equal distance across the entire scale • On 1-10 scale of “democracy,” difference between 1-2 same as difference between 9-10; allows identification of both level relation and magnitude • Ratio: Includes features of other levels plus an absolute reference point • Voter turnout rate; reference to both other levels and overall population

  7. Measurement Characteristics • Composite Measurements • Indices and scales: Adding (normally) measures of several components to arrive at broader measure of broader concept • POLITY IV democracy measure: Ordinal scales of participation, contestability, and executive constraints added to arrive at general “democracy score” • Additional important concepts: • Exhaustivity: Must be enough categories so that virtually all items will fit into one of the categories • Mutual exclusivity: Items being classified must not fit into more than one category

  8. Variable Reliability and Validity • We must pay particular attention to the “disconnect” between concepts and phenomena • Reliability: Is our operational definition measuring something consistently and dependently? • Ascertained through similar findings across different samples internal consistency assessments (splitting samples) • Validity: Does our operationalization perfectly “fit” our concept (rare)? • Must be aware of measurement error and whether it occurs randomly or systematically

More Related