1 / 7

Central Technical Team Needs for CMS Operation and Upgrade Projects Overview

The document outlines the manpower requirements and operational strategies for the Central Technical Team (TC) involved in the CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid) upgrades at CERN. It details the necessary Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) years across various categories including Detector Systems, Engineering, Infrastructure, and Safety, amounting to 45 FTE-years. It highlights the critical need for specialized expertise, backup support for sustained operation, and effective collaboration among teams. Coordination and incident follow-up processes are mentioned to ensure seamless operations and maintenance in the years to come.

tyanne
Télécharger la présentation

Central Technical Team Needs for CMS Operation and Upgrade Projects Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TC ESP shutdown year running year with Ext.Tech Stop Manpower needed in central technical team ~160 ~120 Fraction provided by CMS Collaboration ~1/2 ~1/3 Estimated totals per TC structural category for 2011: Central technical unit 18 Detector System and Machine Interface -BRM 14 -other 2 Engineering & Electronics 5 Infrastructure & Common Systems 4 Safety & Safety Systems 2 ~45 FTE-years This provides the minimum cover for each expertise and does not allow for the backup needed in some cases for sustained operation

  2. CMS Technical Organisation Overviewfor Operation, Maintenance & Upgrade Projects LMC, S, Myers, DOR, S.Bertolucci Run Coordination T. Camporesi, A. Ryd Upgrade Coordinator J. Butler J. Nash Technical Coordination A.H.Ball (TC), W.Zeuner (DTC) TC office D. Hudson P5 Planning WP coordination Incident follow-up M. Gastal (EAM) Eng & Elec Integration EMD G.Faber M.Hansen Safety C.Schaefer(GLIMOS) [M. Arnaud (SafCo)] SC, BFSP PH-Dept Hd. LHC coord TIOC Infrastructure & Common Systems Teams B. Cure A. Gaddi, Engineering & Electronics Teams H.Gerwig, M.Hansen P5 area management M.Gastal D. Hay PH-liaison P.Petagna CERN-CMS Detector Subsystem Teams D. Abbaneo, K.Gill Run Field Manager P. Siegrist CMS Subdetector Field Coordinators TK N. Bacchetta DT A. Benvenuti M. Giunta ECAL W.Funk A. Singovski CMS Infra Task Groups non-PH support teams & facilities CSC A. Lanaro PH-DT support teams & facilities RPC A. Colaleo HCAL P. de Barbaro Contractors FSUs Alignment G. Gomez Z. Szillasi TE, EN, PH Magnet & Cryo Machine Interface Beam/Lumi monitors N. Bacchetta R. Hall-Wilton

  3. TC ESP To note : A large fraction of individuals in place are supported by subsistence (CERN or CMS). No “fractional weighting” applied. Almost all personnel have specialist expertise and have been in place for a few years: hard to substitute. Meshing with run coordination may still need some work Contributions to patrol and RP piquet not properly accounted for. No upgrade contribution counted, but must use synergy with upgrade work at CERN to maintain key people based here year-round.

  4. TC ESP details

  5. TC ESP details

  6. TC ESP details

  7. TC ESP details (BRM)

More Related