1 / 5

Kantara Initiative Attribute Management Discussion Group Report

This report discusses Kantara Initiative stakeholder requirements regarding Attribute Management, conducting gap analysis between internal and external work, and recommending scope of work, collaboration, and governance around attributes. It focuses on terminology, common language, trust frameworks, and designing consent, and proposes next steps for collaboration with external organizations and Kantara workgroups.

umeko
Télécharger la présentation

Kantara Initiative Attribute Management Discussion Group Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Attribute Management A Kantara Initiative Discussion Group Report Presentation to the OIX AX 1 June 2012

  2. Charter • IDENTIFY: Kantara Initiative stakeholder requirements regarding Attribute Management. • GAP ANALYSIS: Attribute Management KI stakeholder requirements compared to work under development (both internal and external to KI) • RECOMMEND: scope of work, potential KI adoption of external works, collaboration with external organizations and/or new WG in KI to perform design phase of Attribute Management based on requirements, discovery and gap analysis.

  3. Attribute Management Gaps • Terminology • Identify Common Core Business Activity • Attribute Normalization • Context • Common Language – Schema & Metadata • Interoperability Between Protocols • Trust Frameworks • Designing and Implementing Consent • Governance Around Attributes

  4. Recommendations • Defining Contexts • Gaps 3, 4, 5, 6 • Clarify Use • Gaps 2, 8, 9 • Definitions and General Coordination • Gaps 1 (and 3) • Query Language • Gap 6 • Trust Frameworks • Gap 7 • Governance • Gaps 8, 9 • Mechanisms • Gap 8

  5. Next Steps • Under discussion • Looking for comments and collaboration • Opportunity to make progress on coordination (Recommendation 3) with other Kantara WGs, OASIS TC, OIX, NSTIC, FICAM, ITU… and other organizations • Continue to build repository • Continue environment survey • Look at identity attributes in context and in use • Create catalogs • Look at level of * and attribute accreditation

More Related