1 / 98

Addressing School Improvement through Data, III

This document presents a framework for school improvement strategies by leveraging data to achieve Expected Improvements leading to Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). It outlines the transition from Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) to AMO, setting performance targets for reducing non-proficient students by 50% over six years. Specific goals for reading, math, science, and overall student performance are defined, alongside worksheets to monitor progress. This initiative aims to provide a systematic approach for schools to enhance educational outcomes effectively.

vachel
Télécharger la présentation

Addressing School Improvement through Data, III

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Addressing School Improvement through Data, III Presented by Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit, Curriculum and Instruction June 5 - 14, 2012

  2. Topics Independent work: a draft copy of the complete School Improvement by June 22, 2012

  3. Assumptions: You...

  4. NORMS

  5. Http://osi.dadeschools.net/actiondata

  6. 2012-13 SIP Part II: Expected Improvements

  7. 2012-13 SIP Goals

  8. Florida School Accountability

  9. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Benchmark

  10. AYP 39 Components Criteria (NA, No, Yes)

  11. Annual Measurable Objectives

  12. Transition from AYP to AMO

  13. AMO vs. Differentiated Accountability

  14. Target Performance for AMO-2

  15. AMO Performance Targets: 2010-11 to 2016-17 The goal of AMO-2 is to reduce the % of non-proficient by 50% over six years (2010-11 to 2016-17). • 70% 50% of 70 = 35 35÷6 = 5.83

  16. AMO Performance Targets: 2010-11 to 2016-17 The goal of AMO-2 is to reduce the % of non-proficient by 50% over six years (2010-11 to 2016-17). • 40% 50% of 40 = 20 20÷6 = 3.33

  17. Worksheet 1: AMO-2 Target

  18. Worksheet 1: AMO-2 Target

  19. OSI Website -- Http://osi.dadeschools.net

  20. Annual Measurable Objective (AMO)

  21. AMO-2 Reports

  22. Sample of AMO-2 Report Not Making Satisfactory Progress X X X X X X X

  23. Safe Harbor Proficiency Target

  24. AMO-2 and Safe Harbor Proficiency Targets

  25. Safe Harbor Provision

  26. AMO-2 vs. Safe Harbor AMO-2 Targets Safe Harbor Targets

  27. AMO-2 Targets vs. Safe Harbor Provision Targets Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N Y N

  28. SIP GOALS vs. SCHOOL GRADE

  29. SIP-Level of Expected Improvements

  30. SIP Goals for AMO-2 Reading/Math 42 70

  31. SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science

  32. 2012-13 Expected Level of Performance 12*.7=8.4 45+8.4=53 12*.3=3.6 10+3.6=14 55 67-55=12 67

  33. SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science 45+8.4=53 10+3.6=14

  34. SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science

  35. 2012-13 Expected Level of Performance 3*.7=2.1 37+2.1=39 3*.3=0.9 27+0.9=28 64 67-64=3 67

  36. SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science 37+2.1=39 27+0.9=28

  37. SIP Goals for Reading/Math/Science

  38. Worksheet 2: SIP Goals 1 and 2

  39. Worksheet 2: SIP Goals 1 and 2 5*.7=3.5 27+3.5=30.5 5*.3=1.5 25+1.5=26.5 52 57-52=5 57

  40. OSI Website: Http://osi.dadeschools.net

  41. Worksheet 3: SIP Goals 1 and 2

  42. Worksheet 3: SIP Goals 1 and 2

  43. 2012-13 SIP Goals 1 and 2: Reading, Math, Science, and Algebra Goals

  44. 2012-13 SIP Goal 5 %: Reading and Math by Subgroup 2012-13 SIP Goals for geometry and biology, the 2012-13 Baseline results will be used the set for Expected level of performance.

  45. If all data are available, the 2012-2013 Expected Improvement Chart with the individual school data be populated, along with the criteria to be used for determining the 2013 expected improvement.

  46. 2012-2013 School Improvement Plan Current and Expected Level of Performance Writing Attendance U.S History/ Civics Suspension Math/EOC Reading Dropout Prevention Science/Biology Graduation

  47. Take a 10 minutes break Please be back on time Thank you!

  48. Satisfactory Performance

  49. FCAT 2.0/EOC Achievement Level Policy Definitions

  50. FCAT 2.0/EOC Achievement Level Policy Definitions FCAT FCAT 2.0 and EOC

More Related